- View all journals
- Explore content
- About the journal
- Publish with us
- Sign up for alerts
Photosynthesis articles within Scientific Reports
Article 04 December 2023 | Open Access
Optimizing supplemental light spectrum improves growth and yield of cut roses
- Maryam Davarzani
- , Sasan Aliniaeifard
- & Nazim S. Gruda
Article 15 November 2023 | Open Access
Freezing tolerance and tolerance to de-acclimation of European accessions of winter and facultative barley
- Magdalena Wójcik-Jagła
- & Marcin Rapacz
Article 12 October 2023 | Open Access
Eco-friendly strategy for CO 2 enrichment performance in commercial greenhouses based on the CO 2 spatial distribution and photosynthesis
- , Daisuke Yasutake
- & Tomoyoshi Hirota
Article 04 September 2023 | Open Access
Effects of sowing date on photosynthetic characteristics, chlorophyll fluorescence and yield of different Echium plantagineum L. cultivars
- , Longxue Wei
- & Tao Wang
Article 26 August 2023 | Open Access
Divergent responses of native and invasive macroalgae to submarine groundwater discharge
- Angela Richards Donà
- , Celia M. Smith
- & Leah L. Bremer
Article 22 August 2023 | Open Access
Water stress memory in wheat/maize intercropping regulated photosynthetic and antioxidative responses under rainfed conditions
- Sadam Hussain
- , JinJin Wang
- & Hafiz Naveed Ramzan
Article 12 August 2023 | Open Access
Evaluation of secondary sexual dimorphism of the dioecious Amaranthus palmeri under abiotic stress
- Nicholas E. Korres
- , Jason K. Norsworthy
- & Govindjee Govindjee
Article 11 August 2023 | Open Access
Hydrogen peroxide signal photosynthetic acclimation of Solanum lycopersicum L. cv Micro-Tom under water deficit
- Gustavo Ribeiro Barzotto
- , Caroline Pardine Cardoso
- & Carmen Sílvia Fernandes Boaro
Article 12 July 2023 | Open Access
Excess manganese increases photosynthetic activity via enhanced reducing center and antenna plasticity in Chlorella vulgaris
- Amanda L. Smythers
- , Jessica R. Crislip
- & Derrick R. J. Kolling
Article 10 July 2023 | Open Access
Salinity-induced changes in plastoquinone pool redox state in halophytic Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L.
- Maria Pilarska
- , Ewa Niewiadomska
- & Jerzy Kruk
Article 28 June 2023 | Open Access
The effect of combined drought and trace metal elements stress on the physiological response of three Miscanthus hybrids
- Jacek Krzyżak
- , Szymon Rusinowski
- & Marta Pogrzeba
Article 25 May 2023 | Open Access
GO nanoparticles mitigate the negative effects of salt and alkalinity stress by enhancing gas exchange and photosynthetic efficiency of strawberry plants
- Mohammad Reza Malekzadeh
- , Hamid Reza Roosta
- & Hazem M. Kalaji
Article 08 May 2023 | Open Access
Melatonin influences methyl jasmonate-induced protection of photosynthetic activity in wheat plants against heat stress by regulating ethylene-synthesis genes and antioxidant metabolism
- Zebus Sehar
- , Mehar Fatma
- & Nafees A. Khan
Article 05 May 2023 | Open Access
Improving the cotton simulation model, GOSSYM, for soil, photosynthesis, and transpiration processes
- Sahila Beegum
- , Dennis Timlin
- & Chittaranjan Ray
Article 03 May 2023 | Open Access
Effects of total daily light integral from blue and broad-band red LEDs on flowering of saffron ( Crocus sativus L.)
- & Shanduan Zhang
Article 02 May 2023 | Open Access
New insights into raceway cultivation of Euglena gracilis under long-term semi-continuous nitrogen starvation
- Ranjith Kumar Bakku
- , Yoshimasa Yamamoto
- & Kengo Suzuki
Article 25 April 2023 | Open Access
Different LED light spectra’s and nano-chelated potassium affect the quality traits of Dolce Vita cut roses in soilless culture condition
- Zahra Heidari
- , Parviz Noruzi
- & Zohreh Jabbarzadeh
Article 11 April 2023 | Open Access
Plants exposed to titanium dioxide nanoparticles acquired contrasting photosynthetic and morphological strategies depending on the growing light intensity: a case study in radish
- Akram Vatankhah
- & Dimitrios Fanourakis
Article 25 March 2023 | Open Access
Survivability of the lichen Xanthoria parietina in simulated Martian environmental conditions
- Christian Lorenz
- , Elisabetta Bianchi
- & Mickaël Baqué
Article 23 March 2023 | Open Access
Contribution of the leaf and silique photosynthesis to the seeds yield and quality of oilseed rape ( Brassica napus L.) in reproductive stage
- Chunli Wang
- , Jianli Yang
- & Zhouli Wang
Article 10 March 2023 | Open Access
Growth changes of tomato seedlings responding to sodium salt of α-naphthalene acetic acid and potassium salt of fulvic acid
- , Guiling Mao
- & Qiyuan Tang
Article 28 January 2023 | Open Access
Temperature prediction of solar greenhouse based on NARX regression neural network
- Maosheng Gao
- , Qingli Wu
- & Dong Wang
Article 09 January 2023 | Open Access
Early response of Solanum nigrum L. to Lumax and castor oil combination in relation to antioxidant activity, osmolyte concentration and chlorophyll a fluorescence
- Sirous Hassannejad
- , Behrouz Fadaei
- & Zahra Nasirpour
Article 29 November 2022 | Open Access
Optimized border irrigation improved soil water content, increased winter wheat grain yield and water productivity
- Feilong Yan
- , Zhenwen Yu
- & Yu Shi
Article 28 November 2022 | Open Access
Physiological mechanism of exogenous brassinolide alleviating salt stress injury in rice seedlings
- , Nai-jie Feng
- & BaoMing Mu
Article 07 November 2022 | Open Access
Photosynthetic modulation during the diurnal cycle in a unicellular diazotrophic cyanobacterium grown under nitrogen-replete and nitrogen-fixing conditions
- Michelle Liberton
- , Sandeep Biswas
- & Himadri B. Pakrasi
Article 25 October 2022 | Open Access
Salt stress decreases seed yield and postpones growth process of canola ( Brassica napus L.) by changing nitrogen and carbon characters
- , Qingsong Zuo
- & Suohu Leng
Article 06 October 2022 | Open Access
Complete chloroplast genome sequencing and comparative analysis of threatened dragon trees Dracaena serrulata and Dracaena cinnabari
- Waqar Ahmad
- , Sajjad Asaf
- & Abdul Latif Khan
Article 15 August 2022 | Open Access
Translating CO \(_2\) variability in a plant growth system into plant dynamics
- , Je Hyeong Jung
- & Ju Young Lee
Article 02 August 2022 | Open Access
The effect of supplementary light on the photosynthetic apparatus of strawberry plants under salinity and alkalinity stress
- Mohammad Reza Malekzadeh Shamsabad
- , Majid Esmaeilizadeh
Article 27 July 2022 | Open Access
The coupled photocycle of phenyl-p-benzoquinone and Light-Harvesting Complex II (LHCII) within the biohybrid system
- Magdalena Łazicka
- , Adriana Palińska-Saadi
- & Maciej Garstka
Article 08 July 2022 | Open Access
Photosynthetic response and antioxidative activity of ‘Hass’ avocado cultivar treated with short-term low temperature
- Sun Woo Chung
- , Hyungmin Rho
- & Hyun Joo An
Article 05 July 2022 | Open Access
Heat stress mitigation in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) through foliar application of gibberellic acid
- Tianxin Guo
- , Shaista Gull
- & Rehab Y. Ghareeb
Article 01 July 2022 | Open Access
Effects of drought stress during critical periods on the photosynthetic characteristics and production performance of Naked oat ( Avena nuda L.)
- Xinjun Zhang
- , Wenting Liu
- & Haitao Zhou
Article 29 June 2022 | Open Access
Photosystem stoichiometry adjustment is a photoreceptor-mediated process in Arabidopsis
- Iskander M. Ibrahim
- , Steven D. McKenzie
- & Sujith Puthiyaveetil
Decomposing biophotovoltaic current density profiles using the Hilbert–Huang transform reveals influences of circadian clock on cyanobacteria exoelectrogenesis
- Tonny Okedi
- , Kamran Yunus
- & Adrian Fisher
Article 10 June 2022 | Open Access
A photosynthetic rate prediction model using improved RBF neural network
- , Yuanfang Li
- & Jin Hu
Article 23 April 2022 | Open Access
Interactive effect of soil moisture content and phosphorus fertilizer form on chickpea growth, photosynthesis, and nutrient uptake
- Mohamed Chtouki
- , Fatima Laaziz
- & Abdallah Oukarroum
Article 15 April 2022 | Open Access
The role of epiphytes in seagrass productivity under ocean acidification
- Johanna Berlinghof
- , Friederike Peiffer
- & Ulisse Cardini
Article 16 March 2022 | Open Access
A novel variant of the Calvin–Benson cycle bypassing fructose bisphosphate
Article 21 February 2022 | Open Access
Physiological and transcriptome analysis reveals the differences in nitrate content between lamina and midrib of flue-cured tobacco
- Yuqing Feng
- , Yuanyuan Zhao
- & Hongzhi Shi
Article 09 February 2022 | Open Access
Estimating mangrove forest gross primary production by quantifying environmental stressors in the coastal area
- Yuhan Zheng
- & Wataru Takeuchi
Article 11 November 2021 | Open Access
Silicon and mechanical damage increase polyphenols and vitexin in Passiflora incarnata L.
- Jonas Akenaton Venturineli Pagassini
- , Leandro José Grava de Godoy
Article 08 November 2021 | Open Access
Room temperature XFEL crystallography reveals asymmetry in the vicinity of the two phylloquinones in photosystem I
- Stephen M. Keable
- , Adrian Kölsch
- & Jan Kern
Article 22 October 2021 | Open Access
Manganese toxicity disrupts indole acetic acid homeostasis and suppresses the CO 2 assimilation reaction in rice leaves
- Daisuke Takagi
- , Keiki Ishiyama
- & Amane Makino
Article 11 October 2021 | Open Access
Leaf 13 C and 15 N composition shedding light on easing drought stress through partial K substitution by Na in eucalyptus species
- Nikolas Souza Mateus
- , Antonio Leite Florentino
- & José Lavres
Article 13 August 2021 | Open Access
Impact of water stress under ambient and elevated carbon dioxide across three temperature regimes on soybean canopy gas exchange and productivity
- Shardendu K. Singh
- , Vangimalla R. Reddy
- & Dennis J. Timlin
Article 05 August 2021 | Open Access
Modeling photosynthetic resource allocation connects physiology with evolutionary environments
- Esther M. Sundermann
- , Martin J. Lercher
- & David Heckmann
Article 13 July 2021 | Open Access
Difference in light use strategy in red alga between Griffithsia pacifica and Porphyridium purpureum
- Mingyuan Xie
- , Wenjun Li
- & Fuli Zhao
Article 30 June 2021 | Open Access
Drought resistance mechanisms of Phedimus aizoon L.
- , Zhongqun He
- & Shengju Long
Browse broader subjects
- Plant sciences
Browse narrower subjects
- Antenna complex
- C3 photosynthesis
- C4 photosynthesis
- Non-photochemical quenching
- Photosystem I
- Photosystem II
- Explore articles by subject
- Guide to authors
- Editorial policies
- Published: 07 July 2021
Photosynthesis research under climate change
- Sajad Hussain ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9100-360X 1 , 2 na1 ,
- Zaid Ulhassan 3 na1 ,
- Marian Brestic ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3470-6100 4 ,
- Marek Zivcak 4 ,
- Weijun Zhou 3 ,
- Suleyman I. Allakhverdiev ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0452-232X 5 ,
- Xinghong Yang 6 ,
- Muhammad Ehsan Safdar ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1865-5182 7 ,
- Wenyu Yang 1 , 2 &
- Weiguo Liu ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1804-0276 1 , 2
Photosynthesis Research volume 150 , pages 5–19 ( 2021 ) Cite this article
Increasing global population and climate change uncertainties have compelled increased photosynthetic efficiency and yields to ensure food security over the coming decades. Potentially, genetic manipulation and minimization of carbon or energy losses can be ideal to boost photosynthetic efficiency or crop productivity. Despite significant efforts, limited success has been achieved. There is a need for thorough improvement in key photosynthetic limiting factors, such as stomatal conductance, mesophyll conductance, biochemical capacity combined with Rubisco, the Calvin–Benson cycle, thylakoid membrane electron transport, nonphotochemical quenching, and carbon metabolism or fixation pathways. In addition, the mechanistic basis for the enhancement in photosynthetic adaptation to environmental variables such as light intensity, temperature and elevated CO 2 requires further investigation. This review sheds light on strategies to improve plant photosynthesis by targeting these intrinsic photosynthetic limitations and external environmental factors.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution .
Buy single article.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA) Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent this article via DeepDyve.
Adachi S, Nakae T, Uchida M, Soda K, Takai T, Oi T et al (2013) The mesophyll anatomy enhancing CO2 diffusion is a key trait for improving rice photosynthesis. J Exp Bot 64:1061–1072
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2005) What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO 2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol 165:351–371
PubMed Google Scholar
Ainsworth EA, Davey PA, Bernacchi CJ, Dermody OC, Heaton EA, Moore DJ, Morgan PB, Naidu SL, Yoo Ra HS, Zhu XG, Curtis PS (2002) A meta analysis of elevated [CO2] effects on soybean (Glycine max) physiology, growth and yield. Glob Change Biol 8(8):695–709
Atkinson N, Mao Y, Chan KX, McCormick AJ (2020) Condensation of Rubisco into a proto-pyrenoid in higher plant chloroplasts. Nat Commun 11(1):1–9
Bathellier C, Tcherkez G, Lorimer GH, Farquhar GD (2018) Rubisco is not really so bad. Plant Cell Environ 41(4):705–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13149
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Batista-Silva W, da Fonseca-Pereira P, Martins AO, Zsogon A, Nunes-Nesi A, Araujo WL (2020) Engineering improved photosynthesis in the era of synthetic biology. Plant Commun 1: 100032
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Berry JO, Yerramsetty P, Zielinski AM, Mure CM (2013) Photosynthetic gene expression in higher plants. Photosynth Res 117(1):91–120
Bielczynski LW, Schansker G, Croce R (2019) Consequences of the reduction of the PSII antenna size on the light acclimation capacity of Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant Cell Environ Adv Access Publ. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13701
Article Google Scholar
Blankenship RE, Tiede DM, Barber J et al (2011) Comparing photosynthetic and photovoltaic efficiencies and recognizing the potential for improvement. Science 332:805–809
Bracher A, Whitney SM, Hartl FU, Hayer-Hartl M (2017) Biogenesis and metabolic maintenance of Rubisco. Ann Rev Plant Bio 68:29–60
CAS Google Scholar
Brestic M, Zivcak M, Hauptvogel P, Misheva S, Kocheva K, Yang X, Allakhverdiev SI (2018) Wheat plant selection for high yields entailed improvement of leaf anatomical and biochemical traits including tolerance to non-optimal temperature conditions. Photosynth Res 136(2):245–255
Brestic M, Zivcak M, Kalaji HM, Carpentier R, Allakhverdiev SI (2012) Photosystem II thermostability in situ: environmentally induced acclimation and genotype-specific reactions in Triticumaestivum L. Plant Physiol Biochem 57:93–105
Buntru M, Gärtner S, Staib L, Kreuzaler F, Schlaich N (2013) Delivery of multiple transgenes to plant cells by an improved version of Multi Round Gateway technology. Trans Res 22(1):153–167
Carmo-Silva, E., Scales, J. C., Madgwick, P. J., & Parry, M. A. (2015) Optimizing R ubisco and its regulation for greater resource use efficiency. Plant Cell Environ 38(9):1817–1832
Cen Y-P, Sage RF (2005) The regulation of rubisco activity in response to variation in temperature and atmospheric CO 2 partial pressure in sweet potato. Plant Physiol 139:979–990
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chang H, Huang HE, Cheng CF, Ho MH, Ger MJ (2017) Constitutive expression of a plant ferredoxin-like protein (pflp) enhances capacity of photosynthetic carbon assimilation in rice (Oryza sativa). Transgenic Res 26:279–289
Chang TG, Zhu XG (2017) Source–sink interaction: a century old concept under the light of modern molecular systems biology. J Exp Bot 68:4417–4431
Chen JH, Chen ST, He NY, Wang QL, Zhao Y, Gao W, Guo FQ (2020) Nuclearencoded synthesis of the D1 subunit of photosystem II increases photosynthetic efficiency and crop yield. Nat Plant 6(5):570–580
Chen X, Hao M-D (2015) Low contribution of photosynthesis and water-use efficiency to improvement of grain yield in Chinese wheat. Photosynthetica 53:519–526
Chida H, Nakazawa A, Akazaki H, Hirano T, Suruga K, Ogawa M, SatohT KK, Yamada S, Hakamata W et al (2007) Expression of thealgal cytochrome c6 gene in Arabidopsis enhances photosynthesis andgrowth. Plant Cell Physiol 48:948–957
Cramer WA, Zhang H (2006) Consequences of the structure of the cytochrome b6f complex for its charge transfer pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta 1757:339–345
Dann M, Leister D (2017) Enhancing (crop) plant photosynthesis by introducing novel genetic diversity. Philos Trans R Soc B 372(1730):20160380
Delucia EH, Sasek TW, Strain BR (1985) Photosynthetic inhibition after long-term exposure to elevated levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Photosynth Res 7(2):175–184
Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW (2006) Photoprotection in an ecological context: the remarkable complexity of thermal energy dissipation. New Phytol 172:11–21
DePaoli HC, Borland AM, Tuskan GA, Cushman JC, Yang X (2014) Synthetic biology as it relates to CAM photosynthesis: challenges and opportunities. J Exp Bot 65(13):3381–3393
Detto M, Xu X (2020) Optimalleaflifestrategiesdetermine V c, maxdynamicduringontogeny. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16712
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Driever SM, Lawson T, Andralojc PJ, Raines CA, Parry MAJ (2014) Natural variation in photosynthetic capacity, growth, and yield in 64 field-grown wheat genotypes. J Exp Bot 65(17):4959–4973. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru253
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Driever SM, Simkin AJ, Alotaibi S, Fisk SJ, Madgwick PJ, Sparks CA, Raines CA (2017) Increased SBPase activity improves photosynthesis and grain yield in wheat grown in greenhouse conditions. Philos Trans R Soc B 372(1730):20160384
Dwyer SA, Ghannoum O, Nicotra A, von Caemmerer S (2007) High temperature acclimation of C4 photosynthesis is linked to changes in photosynthetic biochemistry. Plant Cell Environ 30:53–66
Eisenhut M, Bräutigam A, Timm S, Florian A, Tohge T, Fernie AR, Bauwe H, Weber APM (2017) photorespiration is crucial for dynamic response of photosynthetic metabolism and stomatal movement to altered CO 2 availability. Mol Plant 10(1):47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2016.09.011
Emmel C, D’Odorico P, Revill A, Hörtnagl L, Ammann C, Buchmann N, Eugster W (2020) Canopy photosynthesis of six major arable crops is enhanced under diffuse light due to canopy architecture. Glob Change Biol 26(9):5164–5177
Engineer CB, Hashimoto-Sugimoto M, Negi J, Israelsson-Nordström M, Azoulay-Shemer T, Rappel WJ, Iba K, Schroeder JI (2016) CO 2 sensing and CO 2 regulation of stomatal conductance: advances and open questions. Trends Plant Sci 21(1):16–30
Ermakova M, Lopez-Calcagno PE, Raines CA, Furbank RT, von Caemmerer S (2019) Overexpression of the Rieske FeS protein of the Cytochrome b 6 f complex increases C 4 photosynthesis in Setaria viridis. Commun Biol 2(1):1–12
Éva C, Oszvald M, Tamás L (2019) Current and possible approaches for improving photosynthetic efficiency. Plant Sci 280:433–440
Evans JR (2013) Improving photosynthesis. Plant Physiol 162(4):1780–1793
Fankhausen N, Aubry S (2017) Post-transcriptional regulation of photosynthetic genes is a key driver of C4 leaf ontogeny. J Exp Bot 68:137–146
Fernie AR, Bachem CW, Helariutta Y, Neuhaus HE, Prat S, Ruan YL, Sonnewald U (2020) Synchronization of developmental, molecular and metabolic aspects of source–sink interactions. Nat Plants 6(2):55–66
Fernie AR, Yan J (2019) De novo domestication: an alternative route toward new crops for the future. Mol Plant 12(5):615–631
Flecken M, Wang H, Popilka L, Hartl FU, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M (2020) Dual role of a rubisco activase in metabolic repair and carboxysome organization. BioRxiv.
Flexas J, Ribas-Carbo M, Diaz-Espejo A, Medrano H (2008) Mesophyll conductance to CO 2 : current knowledge and future prospects. Plant Cell Environ 31:602–621
Flöck D, Helms V (2004) A Brownian dynamics study: the effect of a membrane environment on an electron transfer system. Biophysical J 87(1):65–74
Foyer CH, Shigeoka S (2011) Understanding oxidative stress and antioxidant functions to enhance photosynthesis. Plant Physiol 155(1):93–100
Franks PJ, Doheny-Adams T, Britton-Harper ZJ, Gray JE (2015) Increasing water use efficiency directly through genetic manipulation of stomatal density. New Phytol 207:188–195
Furbank RT, Sharwood R, Estavillo GM, Silva-Perez V, Condon AG (2020) Photons to food: genetic improvement of cereal crop photosynthesis. Jexp Bot 71(7):2226–2238
Gago J, Daloso DM, Carriquí M, Nadal M, Morales M, Araújo WL, Nunes-Nesi A, Flexas J (2020) Mesophyll conductance: the leaf corridors for photosynthesis. Biochem Soc Trans 48(2):429–439
Gong HY, Li Y, Fang G, Hu DH, Jin WB, Wang ZH, Li YS (2015) Transgenic rice expressing Ictb and FBP/Sbpase derived from cyanobacteria exhibits enhanced photosynthesis and mesophyll conductance to CO2. PLoS ONE 10: e0140928
Gu J, Zhou Z, Li Z, Chen Y, Wang Z, Zhang H (2017) Rice ( Oryza sativa L.) with reduced chlorophyll content exhibit higher photosynthetic rate and efficiency, improved canopy light distribution, and greater yields than normally pigmented plants. Field Crop Res 200:58–70
Gutierrez-Rodriquez M et al (2000) Photosynthesis of wheat in a warm, irrigated environment II. Traits associated with genetic gains in yield. Field Crops Res 66:51–62
Guy RD, Momayyezi M, McKown AD, Bell SCS (2019) Emerging roles for carbonic anhydrase in mesophyll conductance and photosynthesis. Plant J 101:831–844
Hay WT, Bihmidine S, Mutlu N, Le Hoang K, Awada T, Weeks DP, Long SP (2017) Enhancing soybean photosynthetic CO2 assimilation using a cyanobacterial membrane protein, ictB. J Plant Physiol 212:58–68
Hendrickson L, Sharwood R, Ludwig M, Whitney SM, Badger MR, von Caemmerer S (2008) The effects of Rubisco activase on C4 photosynthesis and metabolism at high temperature. J Exp Bot 59(7):1789–1798
Ho MY, Shen G, Canniffe DP, Zhao C, Bryant DA (2016) Light-dependent chlorophyll f synthase is a highly divergent paralog of PsbA of photosystem II. Science 353:aff9178
Hossain AS, Skalicky M, BresticM MS, Ashraful Alam M, Syed MA, Hossain J, Sarkar S, Saha S, Bhadra P et al (2021) Consequences and mitigation strategies of abiotic stresses in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) under the changing climate. Agronomy 11:241. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020241
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hsin J, Chandler DE, Gumbart J, Harrison CB, Şener M, Strumpfer J, Schulten K (2010) Self-assembly of photosynthetic membranes. ChemPhysChem 11(6):1154
Hsu, P. K., Takahashi, Y., Munemasa, S., Merilo, E., Laanemets, K., Waadt, R, Schroeder, J. I. (2018). Abscisic acid-independent stomatal CO 2 signal transduction pathway and convergence of CO2 and ABA signaling downstream of OST1 kinase.Pro Nat AcadSci 115(42) E9971-E9980.
Hu H, Boisson-Dernier A, Israelsson-Nordström M, Böhmer M, Xue S, Ries A, Schroeder JI (2010) Carbonic anhydrases are upstream regulators of CO 2 -controlled stomatal movements in guard cells. Nat Cell Biol 12(1):87–93
Hubbart S, Smillie IR, Heatley M, Swarup R, Foo CC, Zhao L, Murchie EH (2018) Enhanced thylakoid photoprotection can increase yield and canopy radiation use efficiency in rice. Commun Biol 1(1):1–12
Hussain S, Liu T, Iqbal N, Brestic M, Pang T, Mumtaz M, Li S, Wang L, Gao Y, Khan A (2020a) Effects of lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, sucrose and monosaccharide carbohydrates on soybean physical stem strength and yield in intercropping. Photochem Photobiol Sci 19(4):462–472
Hussain S, Pang T, Iqbal N, Shafiq I, Skalicky M, Brestic M, Safdar ME, Mumtaz M, Ahmad A, Asghar MA, Raza A (2020b) Acclimation strategy and plasticity of different soybean genotypes in intercropping. Func Plant Biol 47(7):592–610
IPCC (2007) In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller H.(eds.), Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (996 pp)
Itzhak Kurek O, Kai Chang T, Bertain SM, Madrigal A, Liu L, Lassner MW, Zhu G (2007) Enhanced thermostability of Arabidopsis Rubisco activase improves photosynthesis and growth rates under moderate heat stress. Plant Cell 19:3230–3241
Kaldenhoff R (2012) Mechanisms underlying CO 2 diffusion in leaves. Curr Opin Plant Biol 15:276–281
Kebeish R, Niessen M, Thiruveedhi K, Bari R, Hirsch HJ, Rosenkranz R, Stäbler N, Schönfeld B, Kreuzaler F, Peterhänsel C. 2007. Chloroplastic photorespiratory bypass increases photosynthesis and biomass production in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Biotechnol 25:593–599
Keenan TF, Hollinger DY, Bohrer G, Dragoni D, Munger JW, Schmid HP, Richardson AD (2013) Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise. Nature 499(7458):324–327
Kirst H, Gabilly ST, Niyogi KK, Lemaux PG, Melis A (2017) Photosynthetic antenna engineering to improve crop yields. Planta 245:1009–1020
Köhler IH, Ruiz-Vera UM, VanLoocke A, Thomey ML, Clemente T, Long SP, Bernacchi CJ (2017) Expression of cyanobacterial FBP/SBPase in soybean prevents yield depression under future climate conditions. J Exp Bot 68(3):715–726
Kromdijk J, Głowacka K, Leonelli L, Gabilly ST, Iwai M, NiyogiKK LSP (2016) Improving photosynthesis and crop productivity by accelerating recovery from photoprotection. Science 354:857–861
Kubien DS, von Cammerer S, Furbank RT, Sage RF (2003) C4 photosynthesis at low temperature. A study using transgenic plants with reduced amounts of Rubisco. Plant Physiol 132:1577–1585
Kubis A, Bar-Even A (2019) Synthetic biology approaches for improving photosynthesis. J Exp Bot 70(5):1425–1433
Kumarathunge DP, Medlyn BE, Drake JE, Tjoelker MG, Aspinwall MJ, Battaglia M, Cano FJ, Carter KR, Cavaleri MA, Cernusak LA, Chambers JQ (2019) Acclimation and adaptation components of the temperature dependence of plant photosynthesis at the global scale. New Phytol 222(2):768–784
Kumari VV, Roy A, Vijayan R, Banerjee P, Verma VC, Nalia A, Pramanik M, Mukherjee B, Ghosh A, Reja MH et al (2021) Drought and Heat stress in cool-season food legumes in sub-tropical regions: consequences, adaptation, and mitigation strategies. Plants 10:1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061038
Kurek I, Chang TK, Bertain SM, Madrigal A, Liu L, Lassner MW, Zhu G (2007) Enhanced thermostability of Arabidopsis Rubisco activase improves photosynthesis and growth rates under moderate heat stress. Plant Cell 19(10):3230–3241
Lawson T, Vialet-Chabrand S (2019) Speedy stomata, photosynthesis and plant water use efficiency. New Phytol 221(1):93–98
Leakey ADB, Ainsworth EA, Bernacchi CJ, Rogers A, Long SP, Ort DR (2009) Elevated CO 2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. J Exp Bot 60:2859–2876
Leister D (2012) How can the light reactions of photosynthesis be improved in plants? Front Plant Sci 3:199
Li X, Kristiansen K, Rosenqvist E, Liu F (2019) Elevated CO 2 modulates the effects of drought and heat stress on plant water relations and grain yield in wheat. J Agron Crop Sci 205:362–371
Lin MT, Occhialini A, Andralojc PJ, Parry MAJ, Hanson MR (2014) Nature 513:547–550
Liu J, Lu Y, Hua W, Last RL (2019) A new light on photosystem II maintenance in oxygenic photosynthesis. Front Plant Sci 10:975
Long SP, Ainsworth EA, Rogers A, Ort DR (2004) Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants face the future. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:591–628
Long SP, Marshall-Colon A, Zhu XG (2015) Meeting the global food demand of the future by engineering crop photosynthesis and yield potential. Cell 161(1):56–66
Long SP, Zhu XG, Naidu SL, Ort DR (2006) Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant Cell Environ 29(3):315–330
López-Calcagno PE, Abuzaid AO, Lawson T, Raines CA (2017) Arabidopsis CP12 mutants have reduced levels of phosphoribulokinase and impaired function of the Calvin–Benson cycle. J Exp Bot 68:2285–2298
Lundgren MR, Mathers A, Baillie AL et al (2019) Mesophyll porosity is modulated by the presence of functional stomata. Nat Commun 10:2825
Lundgren MR, Fleming AJ (2020) Cellular perspectives for improving mesophyll conductance. The Plant J 101(4):845–857
Makino A, Mae T (1999) Photosynthesis and plant growth at elevated levels of CO2. Plant Cell Physiol 40(10):999–1006
Mali SC, Raj S, Trivedi R (2020) Nanotechnology a novel approach to enhance crop productivity. Biochem Biophys Rep 24:100821
McAusland L, VialetChabrand S, Jauregui I, Burridge A, HubbartEdwards S, Fryer MJ, Fryer MJ, King IP, King J, Pyke K, Edwards KJ, Carmo‐Silva E (2020) Variation in key leaf photosynthetic traits across wheat wild relatives is accession dependent not species dependent. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16832
McGrath JM, Long SP (2014) Can the cyanobacterial carbon-concentrating mechanism increase photosynthesis in crop species? A theoretical analysis. Plant Physiol 164:2247–2261
Momayyezi M, McKown AD, Bell SC, Guy RD (2020) Emerging roles for carbonic anhydrase in mesophyll conductance and photosynthesis. The Plant J 101(4):831–844
Moses T (2019) Shedding light on the power of light. Plant Physiol 179:775–777
Muñoz P, Munné-Bosch S (2018) Photo-oxidative stress during leaf, flower and fruit development. Plant Physiol 176(2):1004–1014
Murchie EH, Niyogi KK (2011) Manipulation of photoprotection to improve plant photosynthesis. Plant Physiol 155:86–92
Murchie EH, Ruban AV (2020) Dynamic non-photochemical quenching in plants: from molecular mechanism to productivity. Plant J 101(4):885–896
Murchie EH, Pinto M, Horton P (2009) Agriculture and the new challenges for photosynthesis research. New Phytol 181:532–552
Nelson N, Yocum CF (2006) Structure and function of photosystems I and II. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57:521–565
Nickelsen J, Rengstl B (2013) Photosystem II assembly: from cyanobacteria to plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol 64:609–635
Nowicka B (2019) Target genes for plant productivity improvement. J Biotechnol 298:21–34
Nowicka B, Ciura J, Szymańska R, Kruk J (2018) Improving photosynthesis, plant productivity and abiotic stress tolerance – current trends and future perspectives. J Plant Physiol 231:415–433
Nuccio ML, Wu J, Mowers R, Zhou HP, Meghji M, Primavesi LF, Paul MJ, Chen X, Gao Y, Haque E, Basu SS (2015) Expression of trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase in maize ears improves yield in well-watered and drought conditions. Nat Biotechnol 33(8):862–869
Orr DJ, Pereira AM, da Fonseca-Pereira P, Pereira-Lima ÍA, Zsögön A, Araújo WL (2017) Engineering photosynthesis: progress and perspectives. F1000Research 6:1891
Ort DR, Melis A (2011) Optimizing antenna size to maximize photosynthetic efficiency. Plant Physiol 155:79–85
Ort DR, Merchant SS, Alric J et al (2015) Redesigning photosynthesis to sustainably meet global food and bioenergy demand. Proc Nat Acad Sci 112:8529–8536
Parry MA, Keys AJ, Madgwick PJ, Carmo-Silva AE, Andralojc PJ (2008) Rubisco regulation: a role for inhibitors. J Exp Bot 59(7):1569–1580
Pearce FG (2006) Catalytic by-product formation and ligand binding by ribulose bisphosphate carboxylases from different phylogenies. Biochem J 399(3):525–534
Prashar A, Yildiz J, McNicol JW, Bryan GJ, Jones HG (2013) Infra-red thermography for high throughput field phenotyping in Solanumtuberosum. PLoS ONE 8(6):e65816
Price GD, Pengelly JJ, Forster B, Du J, Whitney SM, von Caemmerer S, Badger MR, Howitt SM, Evans JR (2013) The cyanobacterial CCM as a source of genes for improving photosynthetic CO 2 fixation in crop species. J Exp Bot 64:753–768
Raven JA (2013) R ubisco: still the most abundant protein of Earth? New Phytol 198(1):1–3
Ren T, Weraduwage SM, Sharkey TD (2019) Prospects for enhancing leaf photosynthetic capacity by manipulating mesophyll cell morphology. J Exp Bot 70(4):1153–1165
Robson TM, Klem K, Urban O, Jansen MAK (2015) Re-interpreting plant morphological responses to UV-B radiation. Plant Cell Environ 38:856–866
Ruban AV (2016) Non photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching: mechanism and effectiveness in protecting plants from photodamage. Plant Physiol 170(4):1903–1916
Ruiz-Vera UM, Siebers M, Gray SB, Drag DW, Rosenthal DM, Kimball BA (2013) Global warming can negate the expected CO 2 stimulation in photosynthesis and productivity for soybean grown in the Midwestern United States. Plant Physiol 162(1):410–423
Ruiz-Vera UM, De Souza AP, Ament MR, Gleadow RM, Ort DR (2021) High sink strength prevents photosynthetic down-regulation in cassava grown at elevated CO 2 concentration. J Exp Bot 72(2):542–560
Sage RF, Kubien DS (2007) The temperature response of C3 and C4 photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 30:1086–1106
Salvucci ME, Crafts-Brandner SJ, Salvucci ME (2004) Relationship between the heat tolerance of photosynthesis and the thermal stability of rubisco activase in plants from contrasting thermal environments. Plant Physiol 134:1460–1470
Savir Y, Noor E, Milo R, Tlusty T (2010) Cross-species analysis traces adaptation of Rubisco toward optimality in a low-dimensional landscape. Proc Nat Acad Sci 107(8):3475–3480
Sawchuk MG, Donner TJ, Head P, Scarpella E (2008) Unique and overlapping expression patterns among members of photosynthesis-associated nuclear gene families in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 148(4):1908–1924
Sedelnikova OV, Hughes TE, Langdale JA (2018) Understanding the genetic basis of C4 Kranz anatomy with a view to engineering C3 crops. Ann Rev Gene 52:249–270
Seneweera S (2011) Effects of elevated CO 2 on plant growth and nutrient partitioning of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) at rapid tillering and physiological maturity. J Plant Interact 6:35–42
Serbin SP, Dillaway DN, Kruger EL, Townsend PA (2012) Leaf optical properties reflect variation in photosynthetic metabolism and its sensitivity to temperature. JExpBot 63(1):489–502
Sharwood RE (2017) Engineering chloroplasts to improve Rubisco catalysis: prospects for translating improvements into food and fiber crops. New Phytol 213:494–510
Shen BR, Wang LM, Lin XL et al (2019) Engineering a new chloroplastic photorespiratory bypass to increase photosynthetic efficiency and productivity in rice. Mol Plant 12:199–214
Silva-Pérez V, De Faveri J, Molero G, Deery DM, Condon AG, Reynolds MP, Evans JR, Furbank RT (2020) Genetic variation for photosynthetic capacity and efficiency in spring wheat. J Exp Bot 717:2299–2311. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz439
Simkin AJ, Lopez-Calcagno PE, Davey PA, Headland LR, Lawson T, Timm S, Bauwe H, Raines CA (2017a) Simultaneous stimulation of sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase, fructose 1,6-bisphophate aldolase and the photorespiratory glycine decarboxylase-H protein increases CO2 assimilation, vegetative biomass and seed yield in Arabidopsis. Plant Biotechnol J15:805–816
Simkin AJ, McAusland L, Headland LR, Lawson T, Raines CA (2015) Multigene manipulation of photosynthetic carbon assimilation increasesCO2 fixation and biomass yield in tobacco. J Bot 66:4075–4090
Simkin AJ, McAusland L, Lawson T, Raines CA (2017b) Overexpression of the Rieske FeS protein increases electron transport rates and biomass yield. Plant Physiol 175:134–145
Simkin AJ, López-Calcagno PE, Raines CA (2019) Feeding the world: improving photosynthetic efficiency for sustainable crop production. J Exp Bot 70(4):1119–1140
Sinclair TR, Jamieson PD (2006) Grain number, wheat yield, and bottling beer: an analysis. Field Crop Res 98:60–67
Sinclair TR, Jamieson PD (2008) Yield and grain number of wheat: a correlation or causal relationship? Authors’ response to the ‘“The importance of grain or kernel number in wheat: a reply to Sinclair and Jamieson”’ by R.A. Fischer Field Crop Res 105:22–26
Sinclair TR, Rufty TW, Lewis RS (2019) Increasing photosynthesis: unlikely solution for world food problem. Trends Plant Sci 24(11):1032–1039
Slattery RA, Walker BJ, Weber APM, Ort DR (2018) The impacts of fluctuating light on crop performance. Plant Physiol 176:990–1003
Smith NG, Keenan TF, Colin Prentice I, Wang H, Wright IJ, Niinemets U (2019) Global photosynthetic capacity is optimized to the environment. Ecol Lett 22(3):506–517
Song Q-F, Wang Y, Qu M, Ort DR, Zhu X-G (2017) The impact of modifying photosystem antenna size on canopy photosynthetic efficiency. Plant Cell Environ 40:2946–2957
South PF, Cavanagh AP, Liu HW, Ort DR (2019) Synthetic glycolate metabolism pathways stimulate crop growth and productivity in the field. Science 363:eaat077
South PF, Walker BJ, Cavanagh AP (2017) Bile Acid Sodium Symporter BASS6 Can Transport Glycolate and Is Involved in Photorespiratory Metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant Cell 29(4):808–823
Spreitzer RJ (2003) Role of the small subunit in ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Arch Biochem Biophy 414(2):141–149
Srinivasan V, Kumar P, Long SP (2017) Decreasing, not increasing, leaf area will raise crop yields under global atmospheric change. Glob Chang Biol 23:1626–1635
Takizawa K, Kanazawa A, Kramer DM (2008) Depletion of stromal P(i) induces high ‘energy-dependent’ antenna exciton quenching (q(E)) by decreasing proton conductivity at CF(O)-CF(1) ATP synthase. Plant Cell Environ 31:235–243
Tausz M, Tausz-Posch S, Norton RM, Fitzgerald GJ, Nicolas ME, Seneweera S (2013) Understanding crop physiology to select breeding targets and improve crop management under increasing atmospheric CO 2 concentrations. Environ Exp Bot 88:71–80
Taylor SH, Long SP (2017) Slow induction of photosynthesis on shade tosunto sun transitions in wheat may cost at least 21% of productivity. Philos Trans R Soc B 372:20160543
Tcherkez G (2013) Modelling the reaction mechanism of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and consequences for kinetic parameters. Plant Cell Environ 36(9):1586–1596
Tester M, Langridge P (2010) Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327:818–822
Thompson M, Gamage D, Hirotsu N, Martin A, Seneweera S (2017) Effects of elevated carbon dioxide on photosynthesis and carbon partitioning: a perspective on root sugar sensing and hormonal crosstalk. Front Physiol 8:578
Timm S, Giese J, Engel N, Wittmiß M, Florian A, Fernie AR, Bauwe H (2018) T-protein is present in large excess over the other proteins of the glycine cleavage system in leaves of Arabidopsis. Planta 247:41–51
Ubierna N, Gandin A, Cousins AB (2018) The response of mesophyll conductance to short-term variation in CO2 in the C4 plants Setariaviridis and Zea mays. J Exp Bot 69(5):1159–1170. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx464
Vandegeer R, Miller R, Bain M (2012) Drought adversely affects tuber development and nutritional quality of the staple crop cassava (Manihot esulenta Crantz). Funct Plant Biol 40:195–200
Von Caemmerer S, Quick WP, Furbank RT. (2012). The development ofC4 rice: current progress and future challenges. Science 336, 1671–1672.
von Caemmerer S, Evans JR (2010) Enhancing C3 photosynthesis. Plant Physiol 154(2):589–592
Wachter, R.M. and Henderson, J.N., 2015. Photosynthesis: rubisco rescue. Nat Plants 1(1), pp.1–2.
Walker BJ, Drewry DT, Slattery RA, VanLoocke A, Cho YB, Ort DR (2018) Chlorophyll can be reduced in crop canopies with little penalty to photosynthesis. Plant Physiol 176(2):1215–1232
Wallace JG, Rodgers-Melnick E, Buckler ES (2018) On the road to breeding 4.0: unraveling the good, the bad, and the boring of crop quantitative genomics. Ann Rev Gene. 52:421–444
Wang LM, Shen BR, Li BD, Zhang CL, Lin M, Tong PP, Peng XX (2020) A synthetic photorespiratory shortcut enhances photosynthesis to boost biomass and grain yield in rice. Mol Plant 13(12):1802–1815
Wang P, Hendron RW, Kelly S (2017) Transcriptional control of photosynthetic capacity: conservation and divergence from Arabidopsis to rice. New Phytol 216:32–45
Wang QL, Chen JH, He NY, Guo FQ (2018) Metabolic reprogramming in chloroplasts under heat stress in plants. Int J Mol Sci 19(3):849
PubMed Central Google Scholar
Way DA, Yamori W (2014) Thermal acclimation of photosynthesis: on the importance of adjusting our definitions and accounting for thermal acclimation of respiration. Photosynth Res 119(1–2):89–100
Wise RR, Olson AJ, Schrader SM, Sharkey TD (2004) Electron transport is the functional limitation of photosynthesis in field-grown Pima cotton plants at high temperature. Plant Cell Environ 27:717–724
Wu A, Hammer GL, Doherty A, von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (2019) Quantifying impacts of enhancing photosynthesis on crop yield. Nat Plants 5(4):380–388
Xin CP, Tholen D, Devloo V, Zhu XG (2015) The benefits of photorespiratory bypasses: how can they work? Plant Physiol 167:574–585
Yadav SK, Khatri K, Rathore MS, Jha B (2018) Introgression of UfCyt c6, a thylakoid lumen protein from a green seaweed Ulva fasciata Delile enhanced photosynthesis and growth in tobacco. Mol Biol Rep 45:1745–1758
Yamori W, Von Caemmerer S (2009) Effect of Rubisco activase deficiency on the temperature response of CO2 assimilation rate and Rubisco activation state: insights from transgenic tobacco with reduced amounts of Rubisco activase. Plant Physiol 151:2073–2082
Yamori W, Noguchi K, Hikosaka K, Terashima I (2010) Phenotypic plasticity in photosynthetic temperature acclimation among crop species with different cold tolerances. Plant Physiol 152:388–399
Yamori W, Hikosaka K, Way DA (2014) Temperature response of photosynthesis in C3, C4, and CAM plants: temperature acclimation and temperature adaptation. Photosynth Res 119:101–117
Yoon M, Putterill JJ, Ross GS, Laing WA (2001) Determination of the relative expression levels of Rubisco small subunit genes in Arabidopsis by rapid amplification of cDNA ends. Ana Biochem 291(2):237–244
Zhang J et al (2018) Insights into the molecular mechanisms of CO 2 -mediated regulation of stomatal movements. Curr Biol 28:R1356–R1363
Zheng Y, Li F, Hao L, Yu J, Guo L, Zhou H, Ma C, Zhang X, Xu M (2019) Elevated CO 2 concentration induces photosynthetic down-regulation with changes in leaf structure, non-structural carbohydrates and nitrogen content of soybean. BMC Plant Biol 19(1):1–18
Zhou XT, Wang F, Ma YP, Jia LJ, Liu N, Wang HY, Zhao P, Xia GX, Zhong NQ (2018) Ectopic expression of SsPETE2, a plastocyanin from Suaedasalsa, improves plant tolerance to oxidative stress. Plant Sci 268:1–10
Zhu XG, de Sturler E, Long SP (2007) Optimizing the distribution of resources between enzymes of carbon metabolism can dramatically increase photosynthetic rate: a numerical simulation using an evolutionary algorithm. Plant Physiol 145:513–526
Zhu X-G, Long SP, Ort DR (2010) Improving photosynthetic 1534 efficiency for greater yield. Ann Rev Plant Biol 61:235–261
Zhu XG, Portis AR Jr, Long SP (2004) Would transformation of C3 crop plants with foreign Rubisco increase productivity? A computational analysis extrapolating from kinetic properties to canopy photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 27(2):155–165
Ziotti ABS, Silva BP, Neto MC (2019) Photorespiration is crucial for salinity acclimation in castor bean. Environ Exp Bot. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103845
The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31871570) and Sichuan Innovation Team Project of National Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System (SCCXTD-2020-20) and VEGA-1-0589-19 & APVV-18-0465. And Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production co-sponsored by Province and Ministry (CIC-MCP), the Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (14th 5-year New Oil Crops Breeding).
Sajad Hussain and Zaid Ulhassan have contributed equally to this work.
Authors and Affiliations
College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211-Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, 611130, People’s Republic of China
Sajad Hussain, Wenyu Yang & Weiguo Liu
Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China (Ministry of Agriculture), Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
Institute of Crop Science, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Laboratory of Spectroscopy Sensing, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, People’s Republic of China
Zaid Ulhassan & Weijun Zhou
Department of Plant Physiology, Slovak University of Agriculture, 94976, Nitra, Slovakia
Marian Brestic & Marek Zivcak
К.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Botanicheskaya St. 35, Moscow, Russia, 127276
Suleyman I. Allakhverdiev
Department of Plant Physiology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, Daizong Road No. 61, 271018, Taian, People’s Republic of China
College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, 40100, Pakistan
Muhammad Ehsan Safdar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Wenyu Yang or Weiguo Liu .
Conflict of interest.
All authors declared no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Reprints and Permissions
About this article
Cite this article.
Hussain, S., Ulhassan, Z., Brestic, M. et al. Photosynthesis research under climate change. Photosynth Res 150 , 5–19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00861-z
Received : 27 February 2021
Accepted : 28 June 2021
Published : 07 July 2021
Issue Date : December 2021
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00861-z
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Find a journal
- Publish with us
- Search Menu
- Advance Articles
- Editor's Choice
- Special Issues
- Rapid Papers
- Author Guidelines
- Submission Site
- Open Access Options
- Author Benefits
- About Plant and Cell Physiology
- About the Japanese Society of Plant Physiologists
- Editorial Board
- Advertising and Corporate Services
- Journals Career Network
- Self-Archiving Policy
- Journals on Oxford Academic
- Books on Oxford Academic
Photosynthetic research in plant science.
- Article contents
- Figures & tables
- Supplementary Data
Ayumi Tanaka, Amane Makino, Photosynthetic Research in Plant Science, Plant and Cell Physiology , Volume 50, Issue 4, April 2009, Pages 681–683, https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcp040
- Permissions Icon Permissions
Photosynthesis is a highly regulated, multistep process. It encompasses the harvest of solar energy, transfer of excitation energy, energy conversion, electron transfer from water to NADP + , ATP generation and a series of enzymatic reactions that assimilate carbon dioxide and synthesize carbohydrate.
Photosynthesis has a unique place in the history of plant science, as its central concepts were established by the middle of the last century, and the detailed mechanisms have since been elucidated. For example, measurements of photosynthetic efficiency (quantum yield) at different wavelengths of light (Emerson and Lews 1943 ) led to the insight that two distinct forms of Chl must be excited in oxygenic photosynthesis. These results suggested the concept of two photochemical systems. The reaction center pigments of PSII and PSI (P680 and P700, respectively) were found by studying changes in light absorbance in the red region (Kok 1959 , Döring et al. 1969 ). Chls with absorbance maxima corresponding to these specific wavelengths were proposed as the final light sink. These Chls were shown to drive electron transfer by charge separation. The linkage of electron transfer and CO 2 assimilation was suggested by studies on Hill oxidant (Hill 1937 ). A linear electron transport system with two light-driven reactions (Z scheme) was proposed based upon observations of the redox state of cytochromes (Hill and Bendall 1960 , Duysens et al. 1961 ), and photophosphorylation was found to be associated with thylakoid fragments (Arnon et al. 1954 ). The metabolic pathway that assimilates carbon by fixation of CO 2 was discovered by Calvin's group who used 14 CO 2 radioactive tracers in the 1950s (Bassham and Calvin 1957 ). This was the first significant discovery in biochemistry made using radioactive tracers. The primary reaction of CO 2 fixation is catalyzed by Rubisco (Weissbach et al. 1956 ), initially called Fraction 1 protein (Wildman and Bonner 1947 ). Rubisco is the most abundant protein in the world, largely because it is also the most inefficient with the lowest catalytic turnover rate (1–3 s –1 ). Another CO 2 fixation pathway was then found in sugarcane (Kortschak et al. 1964, Hatch and Slack 1965) and named C 4 photosynthesis.
Although photosynthesis plays the central role in the energy metabolism of plants, historically there have not been strong interactions between photosynthesis research and other fields of plant science. Many techniques and tools developed for photosynthesis research have not been widely used in other fields because they were developed to examine phenomena unique to photosynthesis. For example, excitation energy transfer and charge separation are fundamental but unique processes of photosynthesis. Another reason for the historic isolation of photosynthesis research within plant science is that it was long believed that CO 2 fixation and carbohydrate production are the sole function of photosynthesis, with carbohydrates representing the only link between photosynthesis and other biological phenomena.
However, this situation has begun to change. Recent research has revealed that photosynthesis is closely related to a variety of other physiological processes. It is a major system for controlling the redox state of cells, playing an important role in regulating enzyme activity and many other cellular processes (Buchanan and Balmer 2005 , Hisabori et al. 2007 ). Photosynthesis also generates reactive oxygen species, which are now appreciated as being regulatory factors for many biological processes rather than inevitable by-products of photosynthesis (Wagner et al. 2004 , Beck 2005 ). Precursor molecules of Chl, which are a major component of photosynthesis, act as a chloroplast-derived signal, and are involved in regulating the cell cycle (Kobayashi et al. 2009 ). In light of this new information, it seems important to re-evaluate the function(s), both potential and demonstrated, of photosynthesis from a variety of view points. Photosynthesis research now employs the methods and tools of molecular biology and genetics, which are central methods for plant science in general. Meanwhile, Chl fluorescence and gas exchange measurements, developed especially for photosynthesis research, are now widely used in stress biology and ecology.
Photosynthesis research also contributes to our understanding of ecological phenomena and even the global environments (Farquhar et al. 1980 , de Pury and Farquhar 1997 , Monsi and Saeki 2005 ). Indeed, photosynthesis is now an integral component of simulation models used to predict the future of our planet. Improving the efficiency of photosynthesis by artificial modification of photosynthetic proteins and pathways has long been considered impossible or at best problematic, because, over evolutionary time, photosynthesis has become complex and tightly regulated. However, recent advances have made it possible to manipulate photosynthesis using molecular genetic technology (Andrews and Whiney 2003 , Raines 2006 ). These advances may have positive influences on crop productivity (Parry et al. 2007 ) as photosynthetic rates have frequently been correlated with biomass accretion (Kruger and Volin 2006 ). Thus, we can expect many more novel concepts to be added to this history of photosynthetic research.
As photosynthesis research tackles new challenges, we should also continue to re-evaluate past research. Oxygen evolution, energy dissipation and cyclic electron transport are crucial processes during photosynthesis, yet their mechanisms still remain to be clarified. We have very limited knowledge of the formation and degradation of photosynthetic apparatus. Also, although photosynthesis plays a central role in C and N metabolism in plants, we do not yet understand how potential photosynthesis is related to crop productivity.
Plant and Cell Physiology would like to contribute to the development of novel concepts, pioneering new fields and solving the unanswered questions of photosynthesis. This special issue covers a wide range of topics in photosynthesis research. Terashima et al. (pp. 684–697) readdress the enigmatic question of why leaves are green. They show that the light profile through a leaf is steeper than that of photosynthesis, and that the green wavelengths in white light are more effective in driving photosynthesis than red light. Evans (pp. 698–706) proposes a new model using Chl fluorescence to explore modifications in quantum yield with leaf depth. This new multilayered model can be applied to study variations in light absorption profiles, photosynthetic capacity and calculation of chloroplastic CO 2 concentration at different depths through the leaf.
Singlet oxygen, 1 O 2 , is produced by the photosystem and Chl pigments. 1 O 2 not only causes physiological damage but also activates stress response programs. The flu mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana overaccumulates protochlorophyllide that upon illumination generates singlet oxygen, causing growth cessation and cell death. Coll et al. (pp. 707–718) have isolated suppressor mutants, dubbed ‘singlet oxygen-linked death activator’ (soldat), that specifically abrogate 1 O 2 -mediated stress responses in young flu seedlings, and they discuss the processes of acclimation to stresses. Phephorbide a is a degradation product of Chl and one of the most powerful photosensitzing molecules. Mutants defective in pheophorbide a oxygenase, which converts phephorbide a to open tetrapyrrole, accumulate pheophorbide a and display cell death in a light-dependent manner. Hirashima et al. (pp. 719–729) report that pheophorbide a is involved in this light-independent cell death.
Plants regulate the redox level of the plastoquinone pool in response to the light environment. In acclimation to high-light conditions, the redox level is kept in an oxidized state by the plastoquinone oxidation system (POS). Miyake et al. (pp. 730–743) investigated the mechanism of POS using the Chl fluorescence parameter, qL.
Nagai and Makino (pp. 744–755) examine in detail the differences between rice and wheat, the two most commercially important crops, in the temperature responses of CO 2 assimilation and plant growth. They find that the difference in biomass production between the two species at the level of the whole plant depends on the difference in N-use efficiency in leaf photosynthesis and growth rate. Sage and Sage (pp. 756–772) examine chlorenchyma structure in rice and related Oryza species in relation to photosynthetic function. They find that rice chlorenchyma architecture includes adaptations to maximize the scavenging of photorespired CO 2 and to enhance the diffusive conductance of CO 2 . In addition, they consider that the introduction of Kranz anatomy does not require radical anatomical alterations in engineering C 4 rice.
Bioinformatics has become a powerful tool, especially in photosynthetic research, because photosynthetic organisms have a wide taxonomic distribution among prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Ishikawa et al. (pp. 773–788) present the results of a pilot study of functional orthogenomics, combining bioinformatic and experimental analyses to identify nuclear-encoded chloroplast proteins of endosymbiontic origin (CRENDOs). They conclude that phylogenetic profiling is useful in finding CPRENDOs, although the physiological functions of orthologous genes may be different in chloroplasts and cyanobacteria.
We hope you enjoy this special issue, and would like to invite you to submit more excellent papers to Plant and Cell Physiology in the field of photosynthesis.
Citing articles via.
- Recommend to Your Librarian
- Online ISSN 1471-9053
- Copyright © 2023 Japanese Society of Plant Physiologists
- About Oxford Academic
- Publish journals with us
- University press partners
- What we publish
- New features
- Open access
- Institutional account management
- Rights and permissions
- Get help with access
- Media enquiries
- Oxford University Press
- Oxford Languages
- University of Oxford
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide
- Copyright © 2023 Oxford University Press
- Cookie settings
- Legal notice
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
The effect of light quality on plant physiology, photosynthetic, and stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves
- 1 Department of Bioresource Engineering, McGill University-Macdonald Campus, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada.
- 2 Department of Plant Science, McGill University-Macdonald Campus, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada.
- PMID: 33661984
- PMCID: PMC7932170
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247380
The impacts of wavelengths in 500-600 nm on plant response and their underlying mechanisms remain elusive and required further investigation. Here, we investigated the effect of light quality on leaf area growth, biomass, pigments content, and net photosynthetic rate (Pn) across three Arabidopsis thaliana accessions, along with changes in transcription, photosynthates content, and antioxidative enzyme activity. Eleven-leaves plants were treated with BL; 450 nm, AL; 595 nm, RL; 650 nm, and FL; 400-700 nm as control. RL significantly increased leaf area growth, biomass, and promoted Pn. BL increased leaf area growth, carotenoid and anthocyanin content. AL significantly reduced leaf area growth and biomass, while Pn remained unaffected. Petiole elongation was further observed across accessions under AL. To explore the underlying mechanisms under AL, expression of key marker genes involved in light-responsive photosynthetic reaction, enzymatic activity of antioxidants, and content of photosynthates were monitored in Col-0 under AL, RL (as contrast), and FL (as control). AL induced transcription of GSH2 and PSBA, while downregulated NPQ1 and FNR2. Photosynthates, including proteins and starches, showed lower content under AL. SOD and APX showed enhanced enzymatic activity under AL. These results provide insight into physiological and photosynthetic responses to light quality, in addition to identifying putative protective-mechanisms that may be induced to cope with lighting-stress in order to enhance plant stress tolerance.
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Arabidopsis / physiology*
- Arabidopsis Proteins / metabolism*
- Photosynthesis / physiology*
- Plant Leaves / physiology*
- Stress, Physiological / physiology*
- Arabidopsis Proteins
Grants and funding
November 28, 2023
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies . Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
Molecular diversity and evolution of far-red light photosynthesis
by Queen Mary, University of London
Journal information: Frontiers in Plant Science
Provided by Queen Mary, University of London
Feedback to editors
Engineers develop a way to determine how the surfaces of materials behave
17 minutes ago
A mathematical model connects the evolution of chickens, fish and frogs
12 hours ago
Physics behind unusual behavior of stars' super flares discovered
Scientists investigate Socorro Magma Body to enhance volcanic understanding
13 hours ago
Ocean acidification creates legacy of stress for red abalone, study finds
Study reshapes understanding of mass extinction in Late Devonian era
14 hours ago
Neutron scattering study points the way to electrochemical for carbon-neutral ammonia
15 hours ago
Feathered friends can become unlikely helpers for tropical coral reefs facing climate change threat
Researchers develop grassroots framework for managing environmental commons
Baboons in captivity in Ancient Egypt: Collection of mummies offers insights
Relevant physicsforums posts, human hair growth model.
6 hours ago
Could human DNA be every type of plant, animal, or microbe DNA?
Dec 5, 2023
Weighing scale that can measure body fat via impedances
Dec 3, 2023
How many living cells on Earth?
And now, here comes covid-19 version ba.2, ba.4, ba.5,....
Dec 2, 2023
Sars-Cov2, RSV declining; Human Metapneumovirus increased
Dec 1, 2023
More from Biology and Medical
Insights into two rare types of photosynthesis could boost crop production
Sep 20, 2022
Life can thrive around even the smallest stars, study claims
Sep 26, 2022
Locations of structural changes in photosystems I and II that allow growth in far-red light
Dec 20, 2021
Scientists solve structure enabling cyanobacteria to thrive in low light
Feb 5, 2020
New study on a recently discovered chlorophyll molecule could be key to better solar cells
Jan 15, 2020
Unique pigments in photosynthetic marine bacterium reveal how it lives in low light
Jul 14, 2021
Recommended for you
Study reveals genes that set humans apart from other primates in cognitive ability
17 hours ago
Scientists discover plant hormone that boosts growth by 30%
19 hours ago
Study shows exoskeletons of insects become stronger when raised under higher mechanical load
A possible way for early life on Earth to survive cosmic radiation
Let us know if there is a problem with our content.
Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form . For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines ).
Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request
Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.
Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.
E-mail the story
Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form.
Newsletter sign up
Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties.
Donate and enjoy an ad-free experience
We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X's mission by getting a premium account.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Account settings
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
Recent advances in understanding photosynthesis
1 Cologne Biocenter, Botanical Institute II and Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
2 Department of Biology and Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
3 Plant Molecular Biology, Department of Biology I, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
Photosynthesis is central to all life on earth, providing not only oxygen but also organic compounds that are synthesized from atmospheric CO 2 and water using light energy as the driving force. The still-increasing world population poses a serious challenge to further enhance biomass production of crop plants. Crop yield is determined by various parameters, inter alia by the light energy conversion efficiency of the photosynthetic machinery. Photosynthesis can be looked at from different perspectives: (i) light reactions and carbon assimilation, (ii) leaves and canopy structure, and (ii) source-sink relationships. In this review, we discuss opportunities and prospects to increase photosynthetic performance at the different layers, taking into account the recent progress made in the respective fields.
Photosynthesis is a process that all life on earth depends on. Photosynthetic organisms convert more than 10 9 metric tons of atmospheric CO 2 into biomass per year. With the global human population rising from ~7 billion now to 9–10 billion by 2050, the worldwide trend towards a more meat-rich human diet, the loss of harvest and grazing land, and the negative effects of global warming on crop production have put forward the question of whether this incredibly high amount of biomass production can be further increased.
Crop yield is determined by the available solar irradiation energy across the growing season (0.487 S t ), the genetically encoded properties of how the radiation is intercepted (ε i ), the efficiency by which the light energy is converted into biomass (ε c ), and what fraction of the total biomass is partitioned into the harvestable part of the plant (harvest index, ε p ). This results in the Monteith equation: yield = 0.487 • S t • ε i • ε c • ε p 1 – 3 .
The Green Revolution raised the yield potential of the major grain crops mainly by increasing the harvest index, which is now about 0.6. Breeders were also able to improve the light interception efficiency, which in modern cultivars is up to about 0.8–0.9. All available evidence suggests that additional grain yields by further increasing the harvest index or optimizing light interception are rather unlikely; they appear to be close to their biological limits already. In contrast, the best light conversion efficiency (ε c ) observed in field experiments (0.24 in C 3 - and 0.37 in C 4 -crops) is far below the theoretical maxima (0.46 in C 3 - and 0.6 in C 4 -plants) and thus not yet close to its biological limit. Enhancing, and in the long term re-designing, photosynthesis with respect to light energy conversion efficiency is therefore a prime target when aiming to increase crop yield 3 – 6 .
In general, photosynthesis can be described as a cellular trait that uses light energy to convert atmospheric CO 2 into carbohydrates. At a higher level, photosynthesis is determined by the activity of leaves and by the canopy structure. And, finally, photosynthesis is related to the capacities of source and sink tissues, i.e. mature leaves and heterotrophic organs, respectively ( Figure 1 ).
Here, we will discuss the process of photosynthesis from these various perspectives and address putative targets for the improvement of photosynthetic performance.
Photosynthesis as a cellular trait: (1) light-dependent reactions
Novel insights into the dynamic interactions of photosynthetic complexes.
The light-dependent reactions involve five major multi-protein complexes: photosystem I (PSI), photosystem II (PSII), cytochrome b 6 f, ATP synthase, and NADPH dehydrogenase (NDH). In particular, PSI can (transiently) form larger super-complexes with other complexes like cytochrome b 6 f 7 , NDH 8 , and PROTON GRADIENT 5 (PGR5)-PGR5-LIKE 1 (PGRL1) 9 , 10 . More recently, interactions of PSI with PSII 11 and light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) 12 have been characterized. Traditionally, PSI and PSII are thought to be spatially dispersed. However, in cyanobacteria, a megacomplex consisting of PSII, PSI, and phycobilisomes was found 13 . Aro and co-workers reported that PSI and PSII complexes coexist with LHCs in Arabidopsis 14 . More recently, Tanaka and colleagues suggested that about half of PSIIs are physically connected to PSI complexes 11 . The obtained results suggest that when PSII becomes excessively excited, it can divert excitation energy directly to PSI to avoid photo-damage. Conversely, photoinhibition of PSI can downregulate PSII via a mechanism that involves increased reduction of the intersystem electron carrier system due to damage to the FeS clusters of PSI. This is associated with the activation of thylakoid phosphorylation-based mechanisms that increase energy flow towards PSI 15 .
Bassi and colleagues have recently generated plants with a PSI that lacks its natural LHCI antenna system 12 . Despite the absence of LHCI, LHCII can still attach to PSI, and in fact each LHCI-less PSI complex binds one LHCII trimer, thus fully replacing the four Lhca proteins from LHCI by the three Lhcb proteins of LHCII. This demonstrates that LHCI is not necessary for excitation energy transfer from LHCII to PSI, as was previously suggested 16 . Intriguingly, the transfer of energy from LHCII to PSI appears to be more efficient than from LHCI, raising the question of why PSI uses LHCI instead of LHCII. A plausible explanation is that LHCI absorbs photons with lower energy than LHCII, avoiding competition between PSI and PSII for the same photons. Therefore, in low-intensity and far-red enriched light (like the one available under canopy cover), PSI is favored over PSII, avoiding over-reduction of plastoquinone and thus preventing photo-damage.
With respect to photosynthetic improvements, the structural flexibility of the photosynthetic complexes might allow the construction of novel combinations of photosystem cores and LHC antenna complexes. Indeed, it appears to be possible to design an entire set of such combinations that could be tested under different light regimes for their efficiency and use under controlled (such as in greenhouses) and natural (such as in the field) light conditions. In a complementary approach, conditional regulation of various light-harvesting genes might allow for tuned optimization in an ever-changing and challenging environment. Therefore, biotic interactions also need to be considered, taking into account, for instance, trade-offs between photosynthesis and herbivore resistance 17 .
Novel auxiliary components of photosynthetic light reactions
During the last few decades, the structural components of the light reactions, including the multi-protein complexes PSI and PSII, cytochrome b 6 f, ATP synthase, and NDH, have been identified and extensively characterized at the gene, protein, and mutant level. In contrast, the inventory of the auxiliary components of the photosynthetic light reactions is far from being complete. Novel proteins involved in the biogenesis, repair, regulation, and protection of the photosynthetic machinery are continuously identified owing to genetic screens and functional genomics approaches and employing mainly the model species Arabidopsis thaliana , Chlamydomonas reinhardtii , and Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. In Table 1 , recently identified auxiliary proteins of the photosynthetic light reactions are listed. Adding their numbers to the ones of the factors already identified before (reviewed in 18 ), it becomes clear that the number of different proteins controlling the biogenesis and repair of the multi-protein complexes exceeds the one of structural subunits. While for PSI and NDH, and particularly PSII, substantial sets of assembly factors have been known for many years already, until recently only one auxiliary protein (ALB4 19 ) involved in the biogenesis of the chloroplast ATP synthase (cpATPase) has been isolated. Three additional cpATPase assembly factors have now been identified: CGL160 20 , 21 , PAB 22 , and CGLD11/BFA3 23 , 24 . CGL160 represents a protein of prokaryotic origin, whereas CGLD11/BFA3 and PAB are specific to photosynthetic eukaryotes. Interestingly, CGLD11/BFA3 is also targeted to mitochondria but not (yet) essential for the assembly of the mitochondrial ATP synthase 23 . Similar pronounced evolutionary dynamics are displayed by PAM68L, which evolved from a PSII assembly factor to mediate the assembly of the chloroplast NDH complex in Arabidopsis 25 .
The network of protein kinases and phosphatases involved in reversible thylakoid phosphorylation (reviewed in 26 ) and the two ferredoxin-plastoquinone reductase complexes involved in cyclic electron flow (reviewed in 27 ) are now relatively well characterized, and also several factors regulating the dynamics of thylakoid ultrastructure and the acclimation and protection of the photosynthetic machinery have been identified (reviewed in 28 – 30 ). Three recent examples are highlighted here: (i) the levels and phosphorylation states of CURT1 proteins were shown to control the formation of the appressed regions of thylakoids in the so-called grana stacks 31 ; it remains to be elucidated how the activity of CURT1 is regulated under physiological conditions. (ii) The calcium sensor CAS was localized to thylakoids 32 , appears to regulate acclimation and cyclic electron flow in C. reinhardtii 33 , 34 , and was more recently associated with retrograde signaling in A. thaliana 35 ; here, future research needs to clarify the role of chloroplasts in cellular calcium signaling and how CAS is involved in this process. (iii) Very recently, the chloroplast-splicing factor HPE1 was shown to be involved in the regulation of photosynthetic efficiency; in fact, plants without HPE1 re-adjust their light-harvesting pigments, thereby reducing antenna size, improving light capture, decreasing energy loss, mitigating photodamage, and enhancing photosynthetic quantum yield during photosynthesis 36 .
As suggested before, the most promising targets for genetic engineering of the light reactions of photosynthesis––in terms of manipulating one or a few genes––are modifying light harvesting and regulators of photosynthetic electron flow 37 . The resulting plants have the potential to exhibit more efficient photosynthesis under controlled conditions, e.g. in greenhouses, or in regions that cannot otherwise be extensively used for agriculture because of their short growing seasons. In fact, plants without the LHCII protein phosphatase TAP38 and concomitantly with hyper-phosphorylated thylakoid proteins 38 or without HPE1 36 (see above) appear to be superior to normal plants under certain conditions, implying that the modification of single regulatory proteins might positively impact photosynthesis. Moreover, since evolutionary-based adaptation of plants might not cope with the relatively rapid progression of human-made climate change that we experience today, transgenic plants with altered acclimation capacity due to altered activity of accessory photosynthetic proteins might contribute to the generation of improved crop varieties. Proof of this concept was provided very recently. The parallel overexpression of three proteins involved in photoprotection (subunit S of PSII [PsbS], violaxanthin de-epoxidase [VDE], and zeaxanthin epoxidase [ZEP]) accelerated the photoprotective response to natural shading events in tobacco, resulting in increased plant dry matter productivity in fluctuating light and under field conditions 39 .
Photosynthesis as a cellular trait: (2) assimilation reactions
During photosynthesis, plants capture energy from sunlight and turn it into biochemical energy in the form of ATP and reducing equivalents, NADPH. In C 3 -plants, the first product of the CO 2 -fixing ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO), the C 3 -compound 3-phosphoglycerate, is transformed to a C 3 -sugar (triose phosphate) as part of the Calvin-Benson cycle using both ATP and NADPH as products of the light reaction. In most plants, triose phosphates are subsequently converted into sucrose as the main photoassimilate exported from photosynthetically active leaves (the source tissue). The long-distance transport of photosynthates to heterotrophic organs (the sink tissue) serves to supply these organs with carbon and energy. In harvestable organs, carbon can be stored as, e.g., sucrose, starch, oil, or, in combination with nitrogen, protein.
In C 3 -plants, the category to which most of our crop plants belong to, RuBisCO is CO 2 limited and works, at best, at half of its maximal reaction velocity 40 . The oxygenase activity of RuBisCO initiates the wasteful process of photorespiration that finally results in the release of previously photoassimilated CO 2 and ammonia 41 . Multiple efforts have been or are still being undertaken to improve RuBisCO activity either directly 42 , albeit with very limited success so far 6 , or by targeting auxiliary proteins, for instance RuBisCO activase 43 . Alternatively, by introducing CO 2 pumping devices into C 3 -species, the limitations of RuBisCO are expected to be reduced. These CO 2 pumps are to operate via either a C 4 cycle 44 or inorganic carbon-concentrating devices of cyanobacterial origin 45 . There were also attempts to reduce photorespiratory losses by introducing alternative salvage pathways 46 , 47 . In addition, promising approaches have also been initiated to overcome bottlenecks in the Calvin-Benson cycle 48 , 49 .
Photosynthesis: leaves as target for photosynthesis improvement
Leaves are the plant’s organs that are dedicated to photosynthesis. Under high-light conditions, e.g. at midday, plants receive excess energy that they are not able to cope with. It was proposed earlier that photosynthetic efficiency could be maximized by improving the plants’ canopy light distribution in a way that minimizes light saturation of the upper leaves and light starvation of the lower leaves 6 . This could be achieved by (i) varying the angle of the leaves in the canopy, (ii) altering the size of LHCs per photosystem, i.e. fewer LHCs in the upper leaves and larger LHCs in lower leaves, and/or (iii) extending the light absorption spectrum of photosynthetic pigments into the near-infrared region in the lower leaves in order to use this light quality more efficiently 6 , 50 , 51 .
The leaves of the angiosperms vary greatly in size and shape, from single and entire to highly complex compound leaves 52 . However, the role and importance of leaf anatomy in contributing to the photosynthetic output of leaves is largely unexplored. It was suggested earlier that both leaf shape and leaf anatomy contribute to the photosynthetic output of leaves 53 and are therefore promising targets for improving photosynthesis 54 . Genetic studies with rice support this notion by demonstrating that in rice the anatomy of leaves is closely associated with leaf photosynthesis 55 , 56 and, moreover, with crop yield 57 , 58 . Unfortunately, global genetic analyses, preferably with easily accessible genetic model plants, which aim to identify genes affecting the inner anatomy of leaves and concomitantly their photosynthetic output, are still missing.
One approach to tackle this issue would be to compare leaf form and anatomy in established model systems, e.g. A. thaliana and Cardamine hirsuta , which both belong to the Brassicaceae. In contrast to A. thaliana , C. hirsuta has complex leaves subdivided into leaflets. Major steps in understanding the genetic basis for variation in leaf shape both within and between species have already been made 59 – 63 . Both species have been documented to be suitable for an easy identification of genes and their functions. In both species, genes could be identified that affect primarily leaf form and/or the structure and organization of palisade and spongy parenchyma tissues of the leaf. A second step would be to investigate how and to which degree these genes can be used to optimize the photosynthetic output of leaves. The forward genetic approaches could rely on either mutagenesis or the available natural genetic diversity. Both photosynthesis and leaf differentiation are rather conserved in evolution, at least among the angiosperms. The transfer of knowledge from these model systems to the major crop species of this plant family, namely the Brassicas, should therefore be relatively straightforward.
Photosynthesis and the interaction with source-sink metabolism
Photosynthesis is part of a superordinate system, namely the whole plant. From the system’s perspective, the production of goods and their utilization have to be coupled, i.e. previous to the storage of products derived from photosynthetic assimilation processes in sink tissues (i.e. in harvestable organs), and carbon and nitrogen have to be assimilated in the source tissue (i.e. in mature leaves). To increase biomass production, strengthening the capacities of both source and sink tissues have been aimed at, although with varying success 64 – 71 . Molecular targets were mainly related to genes involved in sugar and starch metabolism. A promising approach was recently suggested comprising the simultaneous boosting of both source and sink capacities using the crop plant potato as an example 72 . Here, the moderate repression of the leaf ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, a key enzyme of transitory starch formation or, alternatively, the mesophyll-specific expression of a bacterial pyrophosphate to stimulate sucrose synthesis and to prevent sucrose breakdown were combined with plants that had an increased sink strength. An increase in sink strength was accomplished by tuber-specific overexpression of two plastidic transporters responsible for the import of carbon (glucose 6-phosphate 73 ) and energy (ATP 74 ), respectively, into starch-storing amyloplasts. Both procedures resulted in an enhanced allocation of sucrose from source to sink tissues at the expense of leaf starch accumulation. The combined push-pull approach resulted in doubling the tuber starch yield 72 . This way of proceeding is currently being transferred to cassava, an important staple food in developing countries (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, CASS, OPP1113365).
It remains to be elucidated whether or not the push-pull approach can be combined with recent knowledge on novel photosynthetic components, e.g. by novel combinations of photosystem cores and LHC antenna complexes or by modifying light harvesting and regulators of photosynthetic electron flow to improve photosynthetic efficiency ( Table 1 ). In addition, the push-pull strategy could potentially be teamed up with approaches to alter leaf form and/or anatomy to further improve ε c , i.e. photosynthetic performance and biomass production.
[version 1; referees: 3 approved]
Work in the authors´ laboratories cited in this review was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG), the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), and the European Union (project 3to4).
Editorial Note on the Review Process
F1000 Faculty Reviews are commissioned from members of the prestigious F1000 Faculty and are edited as a service to readers. In order to make these reviews as comprehensive and accessible as possible, the referees provide input before publication and only the final, revised version is published. The referees who approved the final version are listed with their names and affiliations but without their reports on earlier versions (any comments will already have been addressed in the published version).
The referees who approved this article are:
- Roberto Bassi , Department of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy No competing interests were disclosed.
- Karl-Josef Dietz , Department of Biochemistry and Physiology of Plants, Faculty of Biology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany No competing interests were disclosed.
- Eva-Mari Aro , Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland No competing interests were disclosed.
- Reference Manager
- Simple TEXT file
People also looked at
Review article, photosynthesis in a changing global climate: scaling up and scaling down in crops.
- 1 Laboratory of Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
- 2 Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
- 3 Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), CNRS, INRAE, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Evry, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
- 4 Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
- 5 USDA-ARS Plant Physiology and Genetics Research, US Arid-Land Agricultural Research Center, Maricopa, AZ, United States
- 6 Agrobiotechnology Institute (IdAB-CSIC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Gobierno de Navarra, Mutilva, Spain
- 7 Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States
Photosynthesis is the major process leading to primary production in the Biosphere. There is a total of 7000bn tons of CO 2 in the atmosphere and photosynthesis fixes more than 100bn tons annually. The CO 2 assimilated by the photosynthetic apparatus is the basis of crop production and, therefore, of animal and human food. This has led to a renewed interest in photosynthesis as a target to increase plant production and there is now increasing evidence showing that the strategy of improving photosynthetic traits can increase plant yield. However, photosynthesis and the photosynthetic apparatus are both conditioned by environmental variables such as water availability, temperature, [CO 2 ], salinity, and ozone. The “omics” revolution has allowed a better understanding of the genetic mechanisms regulating stress responses including the identification of genes and proteins involved in the regulation, acclimation, and adaptation of processes that impact photosynthesis. The development of novel non-destructive high-throughput phenotyping techniques has been important to monitor crop photosynthetic responses to changing environmental conditions. This wealth of data is being incorporated into new modeling algorithms to predict plant growth and development under specific environmental constraints. This review gives a multi-perspective description of the impact of changing environmental conditions on photosynthetic performance and consequently plant growth by briefly highlighting how major technological advances including omics, high-throughput photosynthetic measurements, metabolic engineering, and whole plant photosynthetic modeling have helped to improve our understanding of how the photosynthetic machinery can be modified by different abiotic stresses and thus impact crop production.
Owing to the expected increase in the world’s population, yields of major crops must increase by over 70% in the next 30 years to sustain human requirements ( FAO, 2009 ) and this should be attained without increasing the use of arable land and detrimental effects on nutritional quality while limiting the use of fertilizers and pesticides This means that breeders must increase crop yield at a rate of +2.4% per year, while the current rate is only +1.3% ( FAO, 2009 ). In addition, abiotic stresses such as heat, drought, and flooding among others will tend to decrease yields up to 50% by 2050, if management techniques such as precision irrigation and breeding for abiotic stress tolerance are not implemented ( Bierbaum et al., 2007 ).
Photosynthesis is a complex process that for simplification can be divided into light reactions driven by electrons passing through different protein complexes associated with chloroplast thylakoid membranes and the Calvin cycle reactions of photosynthetic CO 2 fixation taking place in the chloroplast stroma ( Renger, 2007 ). In the light, the photosynthetic electron transfer chain consisting of photosystem II (PSII), the cytochrome b 6 f complex (cytb 6 f), photosystem I (PSI), and the free electron carriers plastoquinone (PQ) and plastocyanin, lead to the production of ATP and NADPH that fuel the Calvin-Benson cycle (CBC) and other assimilatory processes ( Rochaix, 2011 ; Foyer et al., 2012 ). Three main stages operate during the CBC reactions namely carbon fixation, reduction, and regeneration. In all plants, CO 2 can be fixed by ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO), an enzyme catalyzing the carboxylation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) and leading to two molecules of 3-phosphoglycerate (3-PGA). Instead of CO 2 , RuBisCO can also add O 2 to RuBP, resulting in one molecule each of 3-PGA and 2-phosphoglycolate (2-PG). Since 2-PG is toxic, it has to be removed in a metabolic pathway called photorespiration that is not only energy demanding, but also leads to a loss of carbon in the form of CO 2 . Thus the efficiency of photosynthesis can be substantially decreased under environmental conditions favoring photorespiration ( Ehleringer et al., 1991 ) and this would be associated with factors altering CO 2 entry and diffusion within the leaf such as stomatal density and aperture.
Furthermore, photosynthesis is highly sensitive to abiotic stresses such as drought, high temperatures, and ozone, since they inactivate photosynthetic electron transfer and photophosphorylation, adversely affect photosynthetic metabolic processes, and lead to damage of thylakoid membranes and organelle ultrastructure ( Ainsworth et al., 2013 ; Lobell et al., 2014 ; Sieber et al., 2016 ). In fact, an increase in atmospheric temperature can reduce crop yields by between 6 to 25% depending on the region and the crop ( Sieber et al., 2016 ; Zhao et al., 2017 ). However, drought is the major abiotic stress that impairs crop production ( Mishra and Cherkauer, 2010 ; Lobell et al., 2014 ; Lesk et al., 2016 ; Zipper et al., 2016 ; Matiu et al., 2017 ) due to photosynthetic limitations imposed by stomatal and non-stomatal processes ( Tissue et al., 2005 ; Kohzuma et al., 2009 ; Dahal et al., 2014 ). It has been estimated that drought has caused the loss of 1820 million tons of cereal production during the last 4 decades ( Lesk et al., 2016 ). In the future, drought occurrence and severity are projected to rise, increasing the risk of yield loss by 24% in soybean, 21% in maize, 18% in rice, and 20% in wheat ( Leng and Hall, 2019 ). On the other hand, the predicted increase in atmospheric CO 2 levels, as a substrate of photosynthesis, is expected to increase yields by up to 30% depending on plant species and other environmental conditions ( Ainsworth and Long, 2005 ; Long et al., 2006 ; Sanz-Saez et al., 2017 ). It has been shown that elevated temperature and drought can negate the positive effects of elevated CO 2 on yield ( Ruiz-Vera et al., 2013 ; Gray et al., 2016 ). While plant breeders and plant biologists have worked extensively over the years to increase yields and improve plant responses to abiotic stresses, photosynthesis was often overlooked ( Long et al., 2015 ). Advances in genomics, genetics, and modeling tools have now paved the way for improving photosynthesis to increase yields within climate change scenarios ( Zhu et al., 2010 ; Long et al., 2015 ; Ort et al., 2015 ).
The effects of abiotic stresses on photosynthesis have given rise to numerous review articles ( Hikosaka et al., 2006 ; Pinheiro and Chaves, 2011 ; Ainsworth et al., 2013 ; Song et al., 2014 ; Dusenge et al., 2019 ); however, many of them only focused on specific aspects. In this review, the effects of abiotic stresses are considered from a holistic point of view. It covers the use of “omics” techniques (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and hormonomics) (Section “-Omics” Analyses to Identify Novel Targets and Networks Underlying the Function of the Photosynthesis Machinery: Roads to Develop Engineered Environmental Stress-Tolerant Crops Through Photosynthesis”) to identify potential target genes that could improve photosynthesis and crop yield. Whole plant physiological responses (Section “Physiological Traits Involved in the Maintenance of Photosynthesis as Tools for Crop Improvement in a Context of Climate Change”) and the development of semi- and high-throughput phenotyping techniques (Section “Semi- and High-Throughput Phenotyping Techniques to Measure Photosynthetic Traits”) are described that allow for a better understanding of major physiological traits associating the maintenance of photosynthesis with abiotic stress tolerance. To bring together the wealth of knowledge and to extrapolate the effects of the environment on photosynthetic capacity and plant development at the whole plant land canopy levels, Section “Modeling Photosynthesis in Crop Growth Models” reviews the application of photosynthetic models to calculate carbon gain for biomass production and to estimate possible future impacts of a changing climate on global crop production and grain yield. Finally, Section “Metabolic Engineering to Improve Photosynthesis and Elevated CO 2 Acclimation” gives an overview of the application of metabolic engineering and examples of what has been successfully achieved already to improve photosynthesis and how elevated CO 2 acclimation might limit yield improvement and quality of certain C3-plant species.
“-Omics” Analyses to Identify Novel Targets and Networks Underlying the Function of the Photosynthesis Machinery: Roads to Develop Engineered Environmental Stress-Tolerant Crops Through Photosynthesis
The emergence of omics technologies, such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, ionomics, and hormonomics have permitted to identify components associated with photosynthesis including molecular regulatory circuitries, photosynthetic machinery and functioning, and photoprotective mechanisms, thus underpinning factors paving the way to photosynthesis efficiency-boosting and the improved productivity and quality of modern crop varieties ( Figure 1 ).
Genomics to Study the Natural Variation of Plant Photosynthetic Efficiency
This section does not intend to give a detailed account of genomics and the reader is directed to other publications to read about general genomic innovation for crop improvement ( Bevan et al., 2017 ), development of new genomic technologies ( Huang et al., 2010 ; Takagi et al., 2013 ; Schlotterer et al., 2014 ; Varshney et al., 2014 ; Pandey et al., 2016 ; Crossa et al., 2017 ; Rasheed et al., 2017 ; Scheben et al., 2017 ; Watson et al., 2018 ), and the use of genomics in crop breeding ( Varshney et al., 2012 , 2018 ).
Evolution has been continually shaping photosynthesis, so fine-tuning this rather inefficient metabolic process could help to boost crop yields under normal and adverse conditions. This could be achieved using new plant breeding technologies to target photosynthetic processes and thus to contribute substantially to improving global food security under climate change scenarios. Conventional quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using recombinant inbred lines (RIL) and near-isogenic lines (NIL) is an effective tool to identify quantitative traits associated with photosynthesis and the modulation of photosynthetic parameters in response to environmental cues ( Adachi et al., 2011 ; Gehan et al., 2015 ; Yan et al., 2015 ; de Oliveira Silva et al., 2018 ; Oakley et al., 2018 ). Indeed, RIL and NIL populations have been used to discover genetic variation and genes associated with photosynthetic efficiency, while some specific photosynthesis-related traits were found to be influenced by functional genetic variation in a limited number of genes ( Oakley et al., 2018 ). Indeed, putative QTLs have been detected for Single-Photon Avalanche Diode (SPAD) value, chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, sink size, source strength, carbon isotope discrimination, and carbohydrate translocation ( Ulloa et al., 2000 ; Teng et al., 2004 ; Takai et al., 2010 , 2013 ). Potential QTLs have been revealed also for net CO 2 assimilation rate (A n ) in rice ( Ishimaru et al., 2001 ; Price et al., 2002 ; Zhao et al., 2011 ; Hirotsu et al., 2017 ; Ye et al., 2017 ; Adachi et al., 2019 ), barley ( Teulat et al., 2002 ; Cantalapiedra et al., 2015 ; Liu et al., 2017 ; Du et al., 2019 ), maize ( Fracheboud et al., 2002 ), soybean ( Jun et al., 2014 ; Lv et al., 2018 ; Liu D. et al., 2019 ), cucumber ( Zhang et al., 2004 ), and legumes ( Muchero et al., 2009 ; Kumar et al., 2014 ; Li F. et al., 2015 ). In the case of rice, several loci enhancing leaf A n have been detected on chromosomes 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 11 ( Adachi et al., 2011 ; Gu et al., 2012 ). In addition, some backcross inbred lines (BILs) derived from an indica variety, Takanari, and an elite japonica cultivar have 20–50% higher values of leaf A n than those of the parental cultivars ( Adachi et al., 2013 ). By using BILs and chromosome segment substitution lines (CSSLs), Adachi et al. (2019) detected 10 “qHP” (high photosynthesis) QTLs linked to an increased A n during at least 2 years in the field and named qHP1a, qHP1b, qHP2, qHP3a, qHP3b, qHP4, qHP5, qHP7a, qHP7b, and qHP10. Takai et al. (2013) identified qHP4 in a chromosomal region containing the GPS (GREEN FOR PHOTOSYNTHESIS) gene by using the above-mentioned BIL mapping population. Similarly, a previous fine-mapping study revealed Carbon Assimilation Rate 8 (CAR8) as an A n -enhancing QTL ( Adachi et al., 2017 ). Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is another genetic tool that can be used to identify genes susceptible to make photosynthesis more efficient. This requires the development of high-resolution mapping populations in the form of genotypically detailed diversity panels suitable for genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Together, natural variation associated with different traits can be determined, thereby providing breeders with marker-trait associations that can be directly exploited for crop design ( Huang and Han, 2014 ; Ogura and Busch, 2015 ; Barabaschi et al., 2016 ). The use of natural variation to understand the genetic basis of photosynthetic efficiency represents a powerful tool. Indeed, this approach has been widely used to reveal the genetic basis of photosynthesis-related traits under changing environmental conditions in several crops ( Panthee et al., 2006 ; Wang et al., 2016 ; Lv et al., 2018 ). Tsai et al. (2019) investigated photosynthetic efficiency under salinity stress and identified several chromosomal regions associated with chlorophyll fluorescence parameter variations, and identified some significant SNPs linked to genes involved in salt tolerance. It has been shown also that plants exhibit genetic variation for photosynthetic response to changing irradiance levels ( van Rooijen et al., 2015 ). Additionally, the application of GWAS as a powerful tool to identify candidate genes for the improvement of crop productivity has been validated by its role in the discovery of many genome regions and genes associated to A n and chlorophyll fluorescence under different stresses ( Strigens et al., 2013 ; Fiedler et al., 2016 ; Ortiz et al., 2017 ; Su et al., 2019 ). Recently, a multi-parent advanced generation intercross (MAGIC) strategy was proposed to promote genome intercrossing and shuffling ( Cavanagh et al., 2008 ). MAGIC populations have been developed for several plant species 1 and used to create ideotypes under climate change ( Bandillo et al., 2013 ; Lucas et al., 2013 ; Muchero et al., 2013 ; Huynh et al., 2018 ).
The functional dissection of photosynthesis can be undertaken also by forward genetic screens. Strategies, identification, insights and mutant effects have been reviewed previously ( Somerville, 1986 ; Parinov and Sundaresan, 2000 ; Page and Grossniklaus, 2002 ; Luo et al., 2018 ; Döring et al., 2019 ). Knowledge obtained from mutant screenings can reveal new chloroplast functions, including those necessary for high photosynthetic performance, and accelerate the molecular characterization required for deciphering the genetic basis of plant photosynthesis for future improvements. For instance, Döring et al. (2019) identified genomic segments that contained mutated candidate genes to create a more C4–like bundle sheath by using a mapping-by-sequencing approach. However, a successful forward genetic screen needs an easily identifiable trait followed by a validation of the identified mutated genes by state-of-the-art technologies such as T-DNA knock-out lines, RNAi lines, or by gene-editing tools ( Hahn et al., 2017 ). Indeed, genome editing approaches, such as transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) ( Bedell et al., 2012 ; Li et al., 2012 ) and the CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas9 RNA-guided system ( Cong et al., 2013 ; Feng et al., 2014 ), will enable precise genome engineering that could be useful to improve photosynthesis by generating targeted variations for precision breeding ( Scheben and Edwards, 2017 ; Scheben et al., 2017 ). Crop breeding programs will benefit from the integration of modern genomics approaches, and the use of high-throughput genotyping/phenotyping platforms (see section “Semi- and High-Throughput Phenotyping Techniques to Measure Photosynthetic Traits”). Indeed, within the context of modern plant breeding, several molecular breeding approaches have been applied to introgress genomic regions into elite lines ( Varshney et al., 2012 ). Marker-assisted selection (MAS), marker-assisted backcrossing (MABC), and gene pyramiding programs have been widely used in crop improvement to create desirable characters including high photosynthetic efficiency under (a) biotic stress conditions ( Singh and Singh, 2015 ; Varshney, 2016 ; Cobb et al., 2018 ). While transgenic approaches have been successful in improving plant yield through improved photosynthesis (as highlighted in section “Modeling Photosynthesis in Crop Growth Models”), the genetic mapping of desired photosynthesis-related traits will require an efficient implementation of high-throughput, non-destructive phenotyping (see section “Semi- and High-Throughput Phenotyping Techniques to Measure Photosynthetic Traits” for more details) to assess them between plant genotypes ( van Bezouw et al., 2018 ). The gap between genomes and phenotypes will be bridged by “omics” approaches, including transcriptomics, proteomics, hormononics, and metabolomics.
Photosynthesis and Transcriptional Regulation
About 3000 genes are required for a plant to carry out photosynthesis and high-throughput sequencing to quantify transcripts will help determine when and where a gene is turned on/off. The analysis of deregulated gene expression patterns controlling photosynthesis-related processes across a wide array of cellular responses, phenotypes, and conditions would help to engineer multiple aspects of photosynthesis in the future. This could be achieved by the manipulation of gene regulatory networks. For instance, genes encoding the four major multi-component complexes of the thylakoid membrane [PSII-LHC (light harvesting complex) II, cytb 6 f, PSI-LHCI, and ATP synthase] ( cf. Figure 2 ) that work together to carry out light-dependent energy-production must be co-regulated to be efficient.
Figure 2. Light energy drives mainstream electron flow used by photosystem II (PSII) to reduce plastoquinone (PQ) to plastoquinol. The reducing equivalents on plastoquinol move through the electron transfer chain (ETC) to the cytochrome b 6 f complex and plastocyanin (Pc), releasing protons (H + ) into the thylakoid lumen, while the electrons are used by photosystem I (PSI) to reduce ferredoxin (Fd), again driven by light-supported ETC through PSI. Reduced Fd is coupled to Fd:NADP(H) oxidoreductase (FNR) that catalyzes the reduction of NADP + to NADPH. The oxidation of water by PSII and the oxidation of plastoquinol by the cytochrome b 6 f complex allows the generation of a ΔpH between the thylakoid lumen and the stroma, essential for generating ATP via the ATPase and balancing the proportion of ATP:NADPH produced by electron transfer that is required to function the Calvin cycle that assimilates CO 2 and leads to sugar production, and plant growth.
Photoreceptors regulate the expression of many genes important for plant performance including the initiation of chloroplast biogenesis, chloroplast gene transcription, chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthetic-associated processes like chloroplast movements and stomatal opening ( Lepistö and Rintamäki, 2012 ; Legris et al., 2019 ), therefore engineering these genes could be of great interest to improve photosynthetic traits. The modulation of certain phytochrome gene families, especially PHYA and PHYB, in several crops of interest plays an important role in determining the enhancement of quality and yield as well as the development of agronomically important traits including abiotic stress tolerance ( Franklin and Whitelam, 2007 ; Abdurakhmonov et al., 2014 ; Gupta et al., 2014 ; Gururani et al., 2015 ; Martín et al., 2016 ; Shin et al., 2016 ). At least 41 transcription factors (TFs) have been described in Arabidopsis to act downstream of photoreceptor genes, the most characterized being PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR (PIF) and PIFLIKE (PIL) families of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins. Most plastid-encoded genes appear to be regulated by several sigma factors with overlapping functions. Stress-responsive TFs such as MYC (myelocytomatosis oncogene)/MYB (myeloblastosis oncogene), bZIP, NAC (NAM, ATAF, and CUC) and ZF-HD (zinc-finger homeodomain), CBF/DREB, and AREB/ABF (ABA-responsive element-binding protein/ABA-binding factor) are known to regulate the expression of photosynthetic genes in response to abiotic stresses. Homeobox homeodomain leucine-zipper (HD-Zip) TFs have diverse functions during plant development and stress adaptation, and some members of this family are under the control of the phytochrome system such as ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA HOMEOBOX 2 (ATHB2) ( Kunihiro et al., 2011 ). ATHB17 -overexpressing plants enhance abiotic stress tolerance by coordinating both photosynthesis-associated nuclear genes (PhANGs) involved in the light reactions and an essential nucleus-encoded Arabidopsis σ-Like Factor ( AtSig5 ) ( Zhao et al., 2017 ). The functional analysis of transgenic wheat overexpressing Nuclear Factor Y ( TaNF-YB3 ) provided evidence for the positive involvement of the TF gene TaNF-YB3 in the regulation of photosynthesis genes leading to an increase in leaf chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate ( Stephenson et al., 2011 ). Rice plants over-expressing HARDY (HRD) , an AP2-EREF-like TF, showed drought tolerance, thicker leaves, more chloroplast-bearing mesophyll cells, and improved water use efficiency by enhancing photosynthetic assimilation and reducing transpiration thus contributing to increased biomass in a water-limiting environment ( Karaba et al., 2007 ). Genetically engineering stress-responsive TFs regulating photosynthesis-related genes to modulate stress tolerance may hold promising beneficial traits of agronomic interest including improved productivity.
Further targets for improving photosynthetic traits could be to modulate TFs known to directly control the photosynthetic machinery. GOLDEN TWO-LIKE (GLK) TFs, key mediators of developmental control, have been implicated in positively regulating both chloroplast formation and coordinating the expression of photosynthetic apparatus genes, such as LIGHT HARVESTING COMPLEX PROTEIN genes and tetrapyrrole synthesis genes HEMA1 , GUN4 , GUN5 / CHLH , and CHLOROPHYLL A / B OXIDASE ( CAO ) ( Waters et al., 2009 ; Powell et al., 2012 ; Nguyen et al., 2014 ). Furthermore, the nuclear GATA NITRATE-INDUCIBLE CARBON-METABOLISM-INVOLVED (GNC) TF is involved in the control of both chloroplast development from the proplastid and control of chloroplast growth and division ( Bastakis et al., 2018 ).
Since the ectopic overexpression of some genes might result in the overexpression of other genes (since many genes are coordinately regulated, for instance by photoreceptors) and increase the levels of associated proteins with undesired phenotypic modifications that could increase trade-offs within the agronomic characteristics and worsen productivity, even when photosynthetic performance has been improved. Therefore, it might be required to modulate only photosynthesis-related genes to accomplish the desired boosting of crops under adverse environmental conditions.
The physiological and biochemical changes in plants under specific stress conditions are related to altered gene expression, with a common set of about 750 nuclear-regulated genes responsive to changes in photosynthetic redox state ( Jung et al., 2013 ). Genes showing redox-regulated expression characteristics are either directly involved in or connected to photosynthesis ( Pfannschmidt, 2003 ). Adverse environmental conditions often lead to chloroplast damage including photoinhibition but this can be limited by acclimation mechanisms, many of which are based on ROS generation and/or the triggering of regulatory redox-reactive molecules (e.g., thioredoxins, and reduced glutathione). These redox-molecules can regulate transcription by interacting with TFs and other signaling molecules and thus deregulate the expression of photosynthetic component genes at multiple levels of signal transduction cascades and signaling pathways. Targeting such acclimation mechanisms, at the gene level, could help improve photosynthesis and plant adaptability under abiotic stresses. To achieve this, a better understanding of how triggered regulatory redox-reactive molecules deregulate the expression of photosynthetic component genes is required. Furthermore, the identification of redox signal targets and/or stress-responsive TFs could help identify unknown photosynthesis-related genes.
Although redox-associated changes in nuclear gene expression have been described, only a limited number of TFs that mediate transduction of redox signals controlling chloroplast signaling have been identified ( Pesaresi et al., 2009 ; Petrillo et al., 2014 ). The over-expression of the zinc finger transcription factor, ZAT10, altered photosynthetic rates and resulted in enhanced tolerance to light and exogenous H 2 O 2 photoinhibition, and increased expression of ROS detoxification genes whose products were targeted to multiple subcellular compartments ( Rossel et al., 2007 ). Also, three A-type heat-shock transcription factors (HSFs) -HSFA1D, HSFA2, and HSFA3- were found to be key factors regulating the gene encoding ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE 2 (APX2) in response to a redox-generated plastid stress signal ( Jung et al., 2013 ). Furthermore, RADICAL INDUCED CELL DEATH PROTEIN 1 (RCD1) stabilized the TF Rap2.4-dependent redox-regulation of genes encoding chloroplast antioxidant enzymes, although it was also found to be essential for protecting cells from photooxidative stress, in a widely redox-independent manner ( Hiltscher et al., 2014 ). Recent promising approaches targeting chloroplast energy balance via AOX, a mitochondrial terminal alternative oxidase ( Vanlerberghe, 2013 ; Vanlerberghe et al., 2016 ; Dahal and Vanlerberghe, 2017 , 2018 ) and the overexpression of CBF (C-repeat binding factor) transcription factors ( Dahal et al., 2012 ; Kurepin et al., 2013 ; Hüner et al., 2014 ) have been reported to enhance plant photosynthetic performance under stress conditions.
It can be seen that the manipulation of TF to modulate gene networks and gene expression is an avenue that could be exploited to engineer crops for enhanced photosynthesis and productivity under adverse environmental conditions. To achieve such aims, efforts are required to identify the appropriate TFs. Also, deep learning techniques that exploit large scale data set analyses (chromatin accessibility assays, microarray, RNA-seq expression, ChIP-seq data, gene expression profiles, DNA affinity purification sequencing, ampDAP-seq) to help resolve complex biological problems in transcriptomics need to be developed further.
Photosynthesis is mediated by the coordinated action of ca. 3000 nuclear-encoded preproteins synthesized in the cytosol and imported into organelles through special machineries ( Nakai, 2015 ; Baslam et al., 2016 ) in envelope membranes. About 2400 of these proteins are found in the chloroplast ( Friso et al., 2004 ), while only ca. 100 proteins are encoded by the chloroplast genome. Many environmental changes lead to an imbalance in photosynthetic electron transfer due to a modification of the redox potential of ETC components as well as functionally coupled pools of redox-active compounds (e.g., thioredoxins and glutathiones) thus affecting photosynthetic efficiency ( Roach and Krieger-Liszkay, 2014 ; Larosa et al., 2018 ; Jimbo et al., 2019 ; Takagi et al., 2019 ). This imbalance can be redressed by the photosynthetic control of LHC, PS, and cytb 6 f stoichiometry.
In order to prevent ROS generation, PSI must be induced to accept electrons when PSII is strongly active in the daytime by shorter-wavelength light. The mechanism of induction of PSI occurs through the de-phosphorylation of sigma factors by redox signals monitoring PQ status ( Shimizu et al., 2010 ). Redox proteomics has been developed to monitor the redox dynamics of cellular proteins under environmental stimuli ( Ansong et al., 2014 ; Sadler et al., 2014 ; Ameztoy et al., 2019 ). Application of this technology to plants and chloroplasts has identified novel protein targets undergoing thiol modifications [e.g., NADPH-dependent thioredoxin reductase C (NTRC), chloroplastic fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase)] and plastid redox signaling networks to maintain a high photosynthesis efficiency which is important for the global adjustment of plant metabolism ( Lindahl and Kieselbach, 2009 ; Hall et al., 2010 ; Dietz and Pfannschmidt, 2011 ; Ameztoy et al., 2019 ). Quantitative phosphoproteomic profiling using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) showed that ROS generated by an oxidative burst under drought stress could trigger NO synthesis to protect the photosynthetic apparatus by modulating the phosphorylation of diverse proteins such as LHC, thylakoid-bound Ser/Thr kinase STN7, and chloroplast post-illumination chlorophyll-fluorescence-increase protein (PIFI). ROS produced under drought conditions provoked an increase of the cellular concentration of Fe 2+ ions, resulting in an increased electron transfer to oxygen via the Fenton reaction ( de Carvalho, 2008 ). Similar effects are observed under nutrient starvation, including Mg 2+ and Fe 2+ , which are essential co-factors for several redox-active proteins in the photosynthetic ETC. More recently, Inomata et al. (2018) reported the chloroplast phosphoproteome profile of a rice nucleotide pyrophosphatase / phosphodiesterase 1 (NPP1) mutant. This study highlighted that the loss-of-function of NPP1 in rice leaves increased stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, starch, and sucrose storage while also impacting proteins involved in carbohydrate metabolism and protein synthesis system under high temperature and CO 2 conditions. Their data indicated that NPP1 plays a crucial role in carbon flux by transporting carbon taken up from starch and from cell wall polysaccharide biosynthesis to other metabolic pathways in response to the physiological needs of the cell.
Using proteomics, five new photosynthetic activity responsive transcriptional regulators were classed as redox-active in response to nutrient limitation in the photosynthetic cyanobacteria Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002. These were RbcR regulating the rbc LXS operon, Fur and Zur regulating iron and zinc homeostasis, respectively, cyAbrB regulating N and C metabolisms, and a TetR family regulator ( Sadler et al., 2014 ). Furthermore, proteomics has led to the identification of proteins that mediate redox control during RNA maturation and transcription. These RNA plastid-encoded polymerase (PEP)-associated proteins are plastid transcription kinases (PTKs) (such as STN, CSK, and cpCK2), which respond to changes in thiol/disulfide redox state mediated by glutathione ( Baginsky et al., 1999 ), and can phosphorylate the sigma-like TF, SIG6 , involved in the regulation of chloroplast gene transcription. Similarly, these PTKs are under the control of the chloroplast GSH (glutathione) pool, suggesting a GSH-mediating redox control of their activities ( Baena-González et al., 2002 ). Proteomics has identified also several heat-responsive TFs and proteins, such as MYB, WRKY, DnaJ protein (LeCDJ1), heat shock proteins (HSPs), filamentous temperature-sensitive H (ftsH11), sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase (SBPase), and constitutive or stress-inducible key enzymes ( Chen et al., 2006 ; Rushton et al., 2012 ; Yang et al., 2012 ; Grover et al., 2013 ; Kong et al., 2014 ). (Phospho)-proteomic analyses suggested that heat-responsive phosphorylation levels of some important proteins [e.g., protochlorophyllide reductase (POR), oxygen-evolving complex (OEC), RuBisCO, and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK)] were modulated, thus indicating that post-translational modifications (PTMs) were critical processes for plant heat tolerance ( Hu et al., 2015 ; Walker et al., 2016 ). A proteomic approach has shown the role of PSII protein phosphorylation [e.g., the minor antenna polypeptide Lhcb4 (CP29)] in PSII protection and in the photoinhibition-repair cycle (reviewed in Aro et al., 2004 ).
In order to optimize leaf gas exchange under stressful environmental conditions, proteins related to stomatal development have been identified. Indeed, plants can modulate stomatal aperture, density, and placement through signaling pathways involving peptide ligands, transmembrane receptors, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) modules. The TFs bHLH [including both MUTE and FAMA, inducer of CBF expression 1 (ICE1/SCRMI), HIGH CARBON DIOXIDE (HIC) protein, PHYTOCROME INTERACTING FACTOR (PIF), mitogen-activated protein kinases (MPKs), and their upstream MKK, YODA, SPCH, C2/H2-type zinc-finger proteins (SZT and AZF2)] have been described to regulate stomatal response to environmental perturbations and improve stress tolerance ( Gray et al., 2000 ; Chinnusamy et al., 2003 ; Sakamoto et al., 2004 ; MacAlister et al., 2007 ; Wang et al., 2007 ; Kanaoka et al., 2008 ; Casson et al., 2009 ; Pillitteri and Dong, 2013 ). EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR 1 and 2, and STOMAGEN are secreted peptides that regulate the function and development of stomata ( Hara et al., 2007 ; Hunt and Gray, 2009 ; Sugano et al., 2010 ). Furthermore, the α-subunit of the heterodimeric G protein (GPA1) and ERECTA protein are known to regulate plant transpiration efficiency by regulating stomatal density ( Masle et al., 2005 ).
Interestingly, chloroplast proteome turnover is crucial to cell homeostasis and adaptation to changing conditions. In their review, Izumi and Nakamura analyzed the influence of extra-plastidial processes on the turnover of chloroplast proteins ( Izumi and Nakamura, 2018 ). Fine-tuning protein turnover, and/or increasing the efficiency of respiratory ATP production can help “maintenance respiration” -the energy required to maintain mature tissue biomass when growth rate is zero ( Thornley, 2011 ; O’Leary et al., 2017 ; Machacova et al., 2019 )-, and hence reduce carbon loss. This process can be a primordial factor in determining growth rate and it may also impact biomass formation. Indeed, growth rate is negatively correlated with protein turnover among Arabidopsis accessions ( Ishihara et al., 2017 ). For instance, eliminating THI4 (a suicide enzyme in thiamin biosynthesis) protein turnover, increased crop biomass accumulation by 4% by essentially reducing the high energy costs and loss of photosynthetically fixed carbon to produce thiamin ( Hanson et al., 2018 ).
As thousands of different proteins make up the machinery of plant cells, proteomics and its derivatives (phosphoproteomics, redox proteomics, and peptidomics) are important tools to better understand processes that regulate protein synthesis and degradation in plants such as protein turnover, abundance, location, compartment-specific proteases/peptidases, protein interactors, and PTMs (e.g., phosphorylation, ubiquitination, nitrosylation, and carbonylation) in steady and non-steady state scenarios. Establishing an integrated understanding of the processes that underpin changes in protein expression under several physiological and developmental scenarios could define new targets to rationally engineer photosynthesis for agronomic gain.
Chloroplasts synthesize hormones that are known to play a critical role in photosynthesis gene expression and to participate as signaling molecules in stress signal transduction. Phytohormones including brassinosteroids (BRs), abscisic acid (ABA), cytokinins (CKs), salicylic acid (SA), ethylene, jasmonate, and auxins have been implicated in the control of stomatal development and function in response to environmental stresses, which ultimately impact photosynthesis. The importance of ABA as a central regulator and integrator of long-term changes in stomatal behavior was revealed by Dittrich et al. (2019) . Under stress environments, such as drought, ABA induces stomatal closure through calcium-sensing receptor signaling driven by NO accumulation via H 2 O 2 production in guard cell chloroplasts leading to membrane depolarization and loss of guard cell volume and turgor ( Wang et al., 2012 ). ABA-dependent guard cell closure has been shown also to be regulated by the guard cell anion channel SLAC1, together with the protein kinase OST1 ( Hedrich and Geiger, 2017 ). Using genetic approaches, Chater et al. (2015) showed that either guard cell ABA or ABA receptors, PYR/PYL/RCAR, were sufficient to mediate a [CO 2 ]-induced stomatal density response. However, recently a model for the convergence of CO 2 and ABA signal transduction downstream of OST1 protein kinase activation has been reported ( Hsu et al., 2018 ). Transgenic rice and Arabidopsis plants overexpressing the pyrabactin resistance 1-like ( PYL ) family of ABA receptors promoted resistance to extreme drought stress by reducing transpiration rate and stomatal conductance thus enhancing the photosynthetic rate and water use efficiency ( Zhao et al., 2016 ). Efforts have been made to improve photosynthetic efficiency by engineering the photosynthesis-related transcription factor, ABA-responsive 17 ( ABR17 ) ( Grover et al., 2013 ). Constitutive expression of ABA-responsive element-binding protein ( ABP9 ) increased photosynthetic capacity, carbon use efficiency and tolerance to high temperature and water stress ( Zhang et al., 2008 ). Xiong and Zhu (2003) suggested that genotypes with putative constitutive high ABA concentrations could be more tolerant to environmental stresses. ABA can also protect the photosynthetic apparatus against photoinhibition by modulating the xanthophyll cycle and by increasing the recovery rate of photo-inactivated PSII complexes ( Saradhi et al., 2000 ). Therefore, altering stomatal sensitivity to ABA could allow plant acclimation to changing environments by optimizing gas exchange for photosynthesis.
A water deficit stimulates not only ABA synthesis but inhibits the production of CKs resulting in an imbalance between the two hormones in leaf tissues and this can control physiological responses (e.g., stomatal closure) that lead to whole plant higher adaptive fitness ( Pospisilova et al., 2005 ; Tanaka et al., 2006 ). The action of CKs is mediated mainly by AHK3 receptors and several TFs (i.e., ARR1 , ARR10 , and ARR12 ) that regulate nuclear gene expression encoding plastid proteins (e.g., LHC, RuBisCO), plastid-related protein abundance [e.g., gamma-subunit of ATP synthase, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), ClpP, ribosomal protein L21], and downstream TFs (i.e., CGA1 , GNC , HY5 , GLK2 , CRF2 ). In this way, CKs modulate chloroplast development, division, and function ( Chiang et al., 2012 ; Cortleven and Schmülling, 2015 ; Okazaki et al., 2015 ). Transcriptomic responses to CKs include over 100 different photosynthesis genes ( Brenner et al., 2012 ) while a (phospho)-proteomic study identified about 50% of CK-regulated proteins to be localized in the chloroplast ( Černý et al., 2011 ). Under high light stress, CKs show a protective function by decreasing photoinhibition, mediated by AHK2 and AHK3 receptors and the TFs ARR1 and ARR12 ( Cortleven et al., 2014 ).
Genetic and pharmacological studies have implicated BRs in stomatal development and patterning. Kim et al. (2012) reported that the BR-insensitive mutants bri1-116 and bsu-q ( amiRNA-BSL2,3 bsu1 bsl1 quadruple mutant) contained only paired guard cells, and lacked other epidermal cells. Genetic analyses indicated that receptor kinase-mediated BR signaling inhibited stomatal development through glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3)-like kinase BIN2, which acts upstream of the MAPKKK YODA, and mediates signaling by ERECTA family receptor kinases. Previous studies had also demonstrated key functions of BRs in inhibiting photosynthetic gene expression, and promoting cell elongation, chloroplast senescence, and floral induction ( Li et al., 1996 ). Furthermore, it was found in leaves and cotyledons that BR-promoted stomatal formation was via a cross-communication of the YDA-MKK4/5-MPK3/6 cascade and the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor SPEECHLESS (SPCH), a regulator of the entry, amplifying and spacing divisions that occur during stomatal lineage development ( Gudesblat et al., 2012 ).
As photosynthetic gas exchange and transpiration balance are impacted by altered stomatal patterning under changing environmental conditions, auxin control of stem cell compartment size, as well as auxin depletion as the switch from unequal to equal divisions, play key roles during stomatal development. High auxin activity has been observed during unequal cell divisions in stomatal patterning, whereas a decrease in auxin activity promoted guard mother cell (GMC) fate and its subsequent equal division into two guard cells. Similarly, an auxin-resistant mutant where AUX/IAA proteins failed to interact with the auxin receptor, leading to auxin insensitivity, was defective in the suppression of stomatal development in dark-grown seedlings ( Balcerowicz et al., 2014 ). Zhang et al. (2014) reported that auxin negatively regulated stomatal development through MONOPTEROS (MP) repression of mobile peptide STOMAGEN gene expression in mesophyll cells where photosynthesis mainly takes place ( Zhang et al., 2014 ). The regulation of stomatal and vascular developments by MP indicated that MP should play a role in photosynthesis and the transpiration system for optimizing plant growth and development. Loss-of-function quadruple mutants, pin2, 3, 4, 7 and pin1, 3, 4, 7 of the PIN gene family, controlling PIN protein-mediated auxin transport, showed stomatal defects ( Le et al., 2014 ). Moreover, Ogura et al. (2019) identified a new gene, EXOCYST70A3 that directly regulated root system architecture by affecting the distribution of PIN4 and hence controlling the auxin pathway without disrupting other pathways. This study suggested that EXO70A3-dependent variation in the control of root system architecture could result in improved photosynthesis and help plants fight climate change. Taken together, such studies showed the important roles of stomata in photosynthesis and global carbon and water circulation and suggest that coordinating stomatal development with photosynthesis could be achieved by manipulating auxin signaling specifically in the mesophyll cells without disturbing whole plant development.
Salicylic acid (SA) acts as an important signaling molecule and influences various physiological and biochemical functions in plants, playing an important role in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Under chilling stress conditions, inhibition of SA biosynthesis by L-α-aminooxy-β-phenyl propionic acid (AOPP) increased PSII photooxidation, leading to the generation of ROS and impairment of photosynthesis and growth, whereas applying SA at moderate concentrations induced a stress tolerance by restoring the photosynthetic machinery ( Cheng et al., 2016 ). Other studies have shown that SA treatment alleviated carbon assimilation and several components of PSII electron transfer under heat stress by increasing proline production through the increase in γ-glutamyl kinase (GK) and a decrease in proline oxidase (PROX) activity, resulting in the promotion of both osmotic and water potentials necessary for maintaining photosynthetic activity ( Wang et al., 2010 ; Nazar et al., 2011 ). Under salt stress, it was revealed that SA could modulate photosynthetic capacity due to its interaction with metabolic signaling by ROS (including H 2 O 2 ), and glutathione ( Arfan et al., 2007 ; Nazar et al., 2011 ; Sewelam et al., 2016 ). Indeed, Miura et al. (2013) reported that SA accumulation in siz1 [small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) E3 ligase] mutant plants enhanced stomatal closure and drought tolerance by controlling guard cell ROS accumulation, while the introduction of salicylate hydroxylase ( NAHG ) into siz1 , which reduced SA accumulation, restored stomatal opening ( Miura et al., 2013 ). Furthermore, other SA-accumulating mutants, cpr5 and acd6 , exhibited stomatal closure thus reducing the entry of sufficient CO 2 for optimal photosynthesis while hindering the movement of water vapor and hence leading to drought tolerance ( Miura et al., 2013 ).
In addition to the SA pathway, jasmonic acid (JA)-signaling (co)-regulates a wide-range of plant developmental processes and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses that probably involve the photosynthesis machinery. Indeed, the examination of high-throughput gene expression data for heat stress and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) responsive genes using GENEVESTIGATOR ( Zimmermann et al., 2004 ), an online tool for large-scale expression data analysis, revealed a preponderance of genes associated with protein translation and photosynthetic electron transport, which could represent features associated with cellular recovery following heat stress ( Clarke et al., 2009 ).
Ethylene receptor mutants show altered photosynthetic properties and they are sensitive to abiotic stresses. Indeed, Arabidopsis etr1 mutants have demonstrated the role of ethylene receptor ETR1 in guard cell H 2 O 2 signaling ( Desikan et al., 2005 ). Other studies showed that ethylene-insensitive mutants, etr1-1 and ein2 , had smaller stomata, possessed lower chlorophyll and CAB (chlorophyll a/b binding complex) contents, RuBisCO activities, and had a lower whole-plant and leaf photosynthetic capacity, suggesting the role of basal ethylene perception in controlling stomatal conductance and photosynthetic capacity ( Grbic and Bleecker, 1995 ; Tholen et al., 2007 ). Other seminal works suggested that ethylene-responsiveness was required for the fine regulation of PSII photochemical efficiency ( Kim et al., 2017 ) and carbon fixation by achieving maximal RuBisCO activities through ethylene-responsive factors (ERFs) ( Bracher et al., 2017 ; Xie et al., 2017 ). The control of photosynthesis by ethylene also affected plant biomass production by influencing final plant size ( Ceusters and Van de Poel, 2018 ). Ethylene was found to directly control photosynthesis in juvenile non-senescing leaves and acted indirectly in mature leaves by promoting senescence.
In conclusion, it can be seen that hormonal networks influence plant photosynthesis and therefore they could assist us to develop new strategies to improve plant productivity and to help plants tolerate severe environmental conditions.
Physiological Traits Involved in the Maintenance of Photosynthesis as Tools for Crop Improvement in a Context of Climate Change
Crop growth is linked to the assimilation of ambient CO 2 through photosynthesis, in which green plants convert sunlight, water, and CO 2 into O 2 and carbohydrates. During the last decade, different studies have highlighted that the improvement of plant photosynthetic rates can be a strategic tool to increase crop yields ( Reynolds et al., 2011 ). Several studies analyzing the impact of overexpression of proteins linked with CO 2 assimilation have shown an increase in photosynthesis and plant growth ( Driever et al., 2017 ; Kubis and Bar-Even, 2019 ; Ermakova et al., 2019 ; see section “Metabolic Engineering to Improve Photosynthesis and Elevated CO 2 Acclimation” for details). Further, as described by Parry et al. (2011) , increases in wheat yield potential during the last decades have been associated with increased photosynthesis while Flood et al. (2011) have shown that variations in either the efficiency or capacity of photosynthesis can lead to variations in growth rate and productivity. Within this context, the adaptive potential of photosynthesis to changing environments depends on the degree of genetic variation for photosynthesis that is present within a population ( Flood et al., 2011 ). Indeed, different studies ( Peng et al., 2001 ; Hubbart et al., 2007 ) show that since 1980, increases in rice yield, rather than harvest index, correlate better with increases in biomass. Furthermore, the fact that varieties released after the 1980’s show higher saturating photosynthetic rates when compared to older varieties suggest that varieties with higher biomass values would be the ones with improved photosynthesis. This suggests that breeding programs aiming to improve crop biomass production will also have an effect on photosynthetic physiology ( Flood et al., 2011 ). Supporting this observation, the increase in crop yields detected in plants grown under elevated [CO 2 ] ( Ainsworth and Long, 2005 ; Long et al., 2006 ; Sanz-Saez et al., 2017 ; Torralbo et al., 2019 ) are also associated with higher photosynthetic rates measured under such conditions.
Yield depends on many factors such as the efficiency of light interception (LI), the radiation use efficiency of light energy conversion to biomass (RUE) and the fraction of biomass that is contained in harvested organs. Leaf morphological and physiological characteristics are two target factors conditioning variation in photosynthetic properties of individual leaves that are influenced by environment and genetics ( Flood et al., 2011 ). Furthermore, genetically based differences in leaf morphology are commonly encountered at the interspecific level, and often correlate with growth ( Hikosaka, 2010 ). During the last decade, the enhancement of plant light capturing surface and conversion of light energy has been a major target of crop breeders ( Murchie et al., 2009 ). Within this context, a clear example of this strategy has been the increase in the development of erect leaves with a higher leaf area per unit ground area that enables more efficient radiation capture ( Murchie et al., 2009 ). Despite this, it should be noted that the major step that is not yet near to the maximum is light conversion efficiency to biomass which is only at 50% of its theoretical level (see Zhu et al., 2008 ; Long et al., 2015 ; Slattery and Ort, 2015 ). However, despite its potential, selection based on improving photosynthesis was not properly considered during the last decades.
The assimilation of CO 2 is a complex process that involves multiple genes, regulatory mechanisms, and different metabolic pathways and plant structures working together. The overall photosynthetic process is determined by CO 2 diffusion to the chloroplast (conditioned by stomatal opening and mesophyll conductance), the capture and conversion of light energy to make ATP and NADPH (the light reactions) required for the assimilation of CO 2 to produce sugar-phosphates used to regenerate RuBP, the molecule used to fix CO 2 by RuBisCO, and to produce complex sugars like starch and sucrose. However, as mentioned in the introduction, O 2 competes with CO 2 at the RuBisCO active site thus reducing photosynthetic CO 2 assimilation capacity and producing toxic 2-PG ( Flugel et al., 2017 ) that is removed by the photorespiratory cycle. Photorespiration has a high energetic cost and it leads to the potential loss of carbon and nitrogen in the form of CO 2 and ammonium. It has been calculated that photorespiration can reduce photosynthetic energy conversion to yield of certain important C3 grain plants by 20−50% (see South et al., 2019 ), including soybean and wheat ( Walker et al., 2016 ). Therefore, photorespiration became a target for crop improvement (see section “Metabolic Engineering to Improve Photosynthesis and Elevated CO 2 Acclimation”). However recent studies ( Betti et al., 2016 ; Eisenhut et al., 2017 ) suggest that reducing photorespiration may not always have beneficial effects since a higher photorespiratory capacity would contribute to: (1) maintaining Calvin cycle activity; (2) decreasing excess reducing power (a target under stressful growth conditions such as exposure to drought, salinity, cold, etc.); (3) improving nitrate assimilation under elevated CO 2 conditions. Similarly, it was found that under low CO 2 availability conditions, unrestricted photorespiratory metabolism favored plant performance ( Eisenhut et al., 2017 ). Therefore, modulating photorespiration would probably be important to maintain or improve crop yield under certain environmental conditions that alter the chloroplast CO 2 /O 2 ratio in favor of O 2 .
Semi- and High-Throughput Phenotyping Techniques to Measure Photosynthetic Traits
Within the context of climate change, it is crucial to identify the crops that will perform better under the current and near-future conditions in the field. However, current breeding programs are constrained by the limitations of field phenotyping methods ( Araus et al., 2018 ). During the last decade, different phenotyping platforms have emerged as a strategic tool to characterize crop performance. The light reactions can be studied by measuring chlorophyll fluorescence, whereas photosynthesis and respiration are studied by measuring CO 2 exchange between the plant and the atmosphere using infrared gas analyzers (IRGA). Depending on the type of parameter, measurements can take a few minutes, such as leaf chlorophyll fluorescence or respiration measurements, to 30−90 min, as is the case of photosynthetic parameters such as maximum rate of RuBisCO carboxylation (V cmax ) and maximal rate of electron transport (J max ) that are calculated using photosynthesis to CO 2 curves, named A-Ci curves ( Farquhar et al., 1980 ; Bernacchi et al., 2003 ).
These parameters can be used to distinguish differences of photosynthetic efficiency under different environments allowing researchers to identify better-adapted cultivars ( Aranjuelo et al., 2009 , 2013 ; Sanz-Saez et al., 2017 ); or be used as input parameters for earth systems models that predict ecosystem responses to environmental changes ( Rogers, 2014 ). However, a lack of information about V cmax and J max in some species in several ecosystems is the major source of error using earth systems models ( Rogers, 2014 ). Another parameter that can be useful for the selection of abiotic stress-tolerant cultivars is dark respiration (R d ) ( Vanlerberghe and McIntosh, 1997 ; Millar et al., 2011 ). Recently, high-throughput methodologies based on O 2 consumption have been developed ( O’Leary et al., 2017 ; Scafaro et al., 2017 ), and they can rapidly (in 1−2 min) measure precise respiration rates. However, this requires the leaf to be removed from the plant and introduced into a measuring chamber, therefore it is destructive and thus not the best option. The latest technology used to estimate this parameter is a non-destructive technique that uses leaf reflectance spectroscopy, and it will be described below.
With the rise of the genomic era, screening of entire populations for traits of interest has become paramount to associate specific genomic regions with a given plant trait (see Section “Genomics to Study the Natural Variation of Plant Photosynthetic Efficiency”). Genomic approaches need the implementation of technologies that allow the rapid measurement of photosynthetic and fluorescence traits to screen hundreds of cultivars in the shortest amount of time. Here, we will summarize semi- and high-throughput phenotyping methods to estimate parameters related to: (1) gas exchange such as V c max , J max , and R d using the latest LI-COR 6400 and LI-COR 6800 methodologies as well as hyperspectral reflectance; and (2) chlorophyll fluorescence such as solar-induced fluorescence (SIF) and stimulated fluorescence by a known source of light.
Semi- and High-Throughput Phenotyping Methods Related to Gas Exchange Parameters
In this subsection, the most recent literature focusing on two aspects of high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) of photosynthetic parameters are summarized and discussed: (1) New semi-HTP methodologies to estimate V c max and J max using the Rapid A-Ci Response (RACiR) method for LICOR IRGA equipment and the use of the leaf excision method to estimate V cmax , J max , and light-saturated photosynthesis. (2) The use of hyperspectral reflectance technology to estimate gas exchange parameters such as V c max , J max , and R d .
Semi High Throughput Phenotyping Methods to Measure Gas Exchange Parameters
In order to estimate V cmax and J max , A-Ci curves need to be performed using an IRGA system. In regular A-Ci curves, the leaf receives different CO 2 concentrations ([CO 2 ]) in the IRGA chamber containing the leaf, usually from 50 μmol CO 2 mol –1 up to 2000 μmol CO 2 mol –1 ( Long and Bernacchi, 2003 ). During this measurement, each time that [CO 2 ] is increased, leaf photosynthesis and stomatal conductance are measured after reaching a steady-state equilibrium ( Long and Bernacchi, 2003 ), which may take between 3 and 6 min per step. In this way, 30 to 90 min are needed per one A-Ci curve, which makes this method a Low Throughput Phenotyping technique.
Due to modifications in the way that the reference and sample IRGAs are placed in the new LI6800, Stinziano et al. (2017) were able to develop a Rapid A-Ci response curve protocol with a duration of approximately 12 min. The new design can minimize lags between the reference and the sample IRGAs thus generating a constant ramp rate for CO 2 control. In this method, the leaf is first stabilized at a [CO 2 ] of 500 μmol mol –1 before being reduced to 0 μmol mol –1 at a rate of 100 μmol mol –1 min –1 . Data is recorded at a rate of 0.5 Hz, which is equivalent to a measurement every 2 s, therefore assuring that changes in photosynthetic response can be recorded. In order not to miss data near the inflection point of the A-Ci response curve, Stinziano et al. (2017) added another set of measurements from 300 μmol mol –1 to 800 μmol mol –1 to complete the curve ( Figure 3 ). Plotting together these 2 curves, the authors were able to fit the data to the Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry (FvCB) model, thus obtaining V c max and J max estimates that were very close to those calculated from a standard A-Ci curve. However, this method has some limitations; for example, although the physical separation between the reference and the sample chamber has been reduced, it still produces a lag between the two signals that is increased when the volume of the sample chamber has to be mixed. This lag creates a differential in CO 2 concentration that if not corrected can cause very significant variations in the measurements. To correct this lag, an empty chamber rapid A-Ci curve is run for each CO 2 ramp ( Stinziano et al., 2017 ). In addition, Stinziano et al. (2019) produced a best practices guide in which they indicated under which conditions an empty chamber A-Ci curve was needed. Taylor and Long (2019) found significant offsets in R d (95% variation) and CO 2 compensation point (Γ, 11% variation). According to their published data, RACiR curves can be a good tool to perform semi-HTP measurements in plant populations, being able to perform up to 60−80 A-Ci curves per day (8-h day) and per machine. However, when starting any experiment, a set of standard A-Ci curves should be performed to test that the method is working for each species and/or environmental condition. Therefore, this RACiR methodology only appears to be worth the effort when analyzing hundreds of samples at the same environmental condition as is often the case for GWAS and/or QTL experiments ( Dhanapal et al., 2015 ; Herritt et al., 2018 ; Luo et al., 2018 ). For small experiments where only a few cultivars/species are to be analyzed, it is more reasonable to do standard A-Ci curve measurements even if it is more time consuming, as they can be used to obtain other important information such as C c , g m ( Harley et al., 1992 ), R d and Γ that can give further valuable information about the physiological state of the plant.
Figure 3. The Rapid A-Ci curve method generates a wealth of data that when corrected to reduce the lags of the empty chamber, etc., overlay well onto the “standard” A-Ci curve. In this case, a modification of an A-Ci curve from Populus deltoides is shown. The graph has been adapted from Figure 2 ( Stinziano et al., 2017 ) by the author of the manuscript. Data for the “standard” A–Ci curve are presented as the mean of the mean (s.e.m.) for three measured responses on the same leaf of a single seedling (gray dots), while RACiRs were replicated once per CO 2 range per seedling on the same leaf at the same location as the “standard” A–Ci curve. The best RACiRs were produced by ramping [CO 2 ] from 500 to 0 (blue) and from 300 to 800 (red). For statistical information about the curve fits and the calculated parameters, please check Stinziano et al. (2017) .
Other problems occurring when measuring A-Ci curves or mid-day photosynthesis under field conditions on hundreds of samples include a transient decrease in water potential, a decrease in chloroplast inorganic phosphate concentration, and a decrease in maximum PSII efficiency. These can all occur after a few hours of light exposure making it difficult to compare measurements at the beginning with those taken at the end of the day ( Ainsworth et al., 2004 ). When measurements are performed in the field, changing environmental conditions can alter the photosynthetic response of the plants thus making it difficult to determine treatment effects. With this in mind, Ainsworth et al. (2004) developed the “leave scission method” where soybean leaves were cut pre-dawn under water, stored in the dark, and stimulated at saturating light, at least 30 min before measurements were recorded. Using this method, all samples were measured under the same temperature, light intensity, and biochemical state. A-Ci curves have been performed in this way for the last 15 years with successful results with soybean ( Ainsworth et al., 2004 ; Bernacchi et al., 2005 ; Sanz-Saez et al., 2015 , 2017 ) and corn ( Leakey et al., 2006 ; Yendrek et al., 2017 ). Additionally, Choquette et al. (2019) used this methodology to phenotype light-saturated photosynthesis response to elevated ozone in a panel of 48 corn lines, measuring more than 200 plots per day. Although this technique cannot be considered high-throughput, we believe that it could be used to screen photosynthetic parameters in diversity panel populations of about 200 lines for several days to cover the different replications. The fact that all measurements are taken under the same conditions reduces the variability associated with weather changes that happen during sampling and allows differentiating between treatments and cultivars ( Choquette et al., 2019 ).
Use of Hyperspectral Reflectance Technology to Estimate Gas Exchange Parameters
Hyperspectral sensors capture electromagnetic radiation reflected from vegetation in the visible (VIS, 400–700 nm), near-infrared (NIR, 700–1300 nm), and short-wavelength infrared regions (SWIR, 1400–3000 nm), which contain information about leaf physiological status, including pigments, structural constituents of biomass, and water content ( Curran, 1989 ; Penuelas and Filella, 1998 ). Variation of foliar reflectance at different wavelengths is specific to variations in the chemical and structural characteristics of the leaf ( Serbin et al., 2012 ). With the improvement of computational methods, predictive models using partial-least square regression (PLSR) have been used to create equations that predict other physiological parameters such as leaf isotopic ratio ( Richardson and Reeves, 2005 ), specific leaf area ( Asner and Martin, 2008 ; Asner et al., 2011 ), leaf carbohydrate content ( Dreccer et al., 2014 ; Asner and Martin, 2015 ), and leaf mineral content ( Mahajan et al., 2014 ). The use of hyperspectral reflectance spectroscopy as a HTP tool has been recognized as promising in agricultural research ( Weber et al., 2012 ; Araus and Cairns, 2014 ), however, until recently its utility to differentiate between a big set of cultivars had not been tested. We will focus now on the methodologies used to produce models capable of predicting photosynthetic parameters such as V c max and J max and R d .
As measuring A-Ci curves is a tedious technique to calculate V c max and J max , Serbin et al. (2012) tested the possibility to predict these parameters using hyperspectral reflectance and PLSR models in aspen and cottonwood seedlings grown at different atmospheric temperatures. Because of large phenotypic variations in V c max and J max due to the temperature treatments and the inclusion of two different species, the correlation between the predicted data using hyperspectral reflectance measurements and the standard A-Ci curves was very high (R 2 of 0.89 and 0.93, respectively). This breakthrough publication demonstrated that it was possible to use hyperspectral reflectance data to estimate photosynthetic parameters. Following this discovery, Ainsworth et al. (2014) carried out a similar experiment with soybean grown at ambient and elevated ozone (O 3 ) in which standard A-Ci curves were combined with hyperspectral reflectance measurements using the Field Spec Hi-Res 4 (ASD technologies). Although the number of samples was not very high (59), the phenotypic variation due to the O 3 treatment resulted in a good correlation between the predicted and the standard A-Ci curve (R 2 of 0.88). More recently, similar correlations between standard and predicted V cmax estimations have been found for corn ( Yendrek et al., 2017 ; R 2 of 0.6) and wheat ( Silva-Perez et al., 2018 ; R 2 of 0.62).
These results are very promising for applications using very big sample sets however, to date, nobody has applied this technique to estimate V c max without testing its accuracy with standard A-Ci curve measurements. Although it seems risky, this is the avenue to take if we want to increase the speed of analysis and contribute to future breeding. To break this barrier, Choquette et al. (2019) tested 45 F 1 corn hybrids with a differential response to elevated O 3 under field atmospheric conditions. The effect of elevated O 3 was studied by performing photosynthesis measurements under light-saturating conditions using a LI6400, and estimations of V c max using hyperspectral reflectance data and equations developed by Yendrek et al. (2017) . In this way, Choquette et al. (2019) showed that they could detect both genotypic and O 3 effects on predicted V c max using hyperspectral data. They found good correlations between V c max and other variables estimated using the spectra such as chlorophyll content, a parameter that had a very strong correlation between predicted and measured values, and thus confirmed the quality of the general predictions.
R d measurements using an O 2 electrode can be quick, around 2 min, allowing semi-HTP screening ( O’Leary et al., 2017 ; Scafaro et al., 2017 ). However, the equipment is expensive and the technique requires destructive sampling of leaf material. To solve these problems, Coast et al. (2019) adapted a piecewise linear regression splines (PLRS) model based on equations developed by Serbin et al. (2012) to estimate R d from large and diverse sets of wheat cultivars. In their experiment, several wheat cultivars were tested under controlled and field conditions thus analyzing a total of 1,318 leaf samples using a standard R d measurement and hyperspectral reflectance measurements ( Coast et al., 2019 ). These authors found an overall R 2 between the measured and the predicted parameters of 0.50−0.63, which was higher than previous parameters used to estimate respiration such as leaf mass area ( Wright et al., 2006 ) and leaf N content ( Reich et al., 2008 ). As for V cmax and J max , it was theorized that some of the low predictability of the models could be due to low phenotypic differences for R d . Indeed, low phenotypic variation has been identified as one of the problems when producing prediction models with NIRS technology as seen for the case of isotopic ratios ( Cabrera-Bosquet et al., 2011 ). This limitation can be solved only by performing experiments with a diverse genetic background under different environmental conditions, or even better with stresses such as drought, elevated O 3 , increasing temperatures, etc. that will increase the variability of the measured phenotype. Furthermore, a collaborative database sharing phenotypes and spectroscopy data could advance this technology much quicker, as suggested by Coast et al. (2019) .
Although further validation is needed using other species and under other environmental conditions such as drought and high temperature, this could be the beginning of an era where researchers can estimate gas exchange related parameters using hyperspectral reflectance spectroscopy data that only takes 1−2 min to collect. Until then, if a researcher is thinking of performing large cultivar screenings using values estimated from hyperspectral reflectance data, it is still recommended to have a reduced set of samples that serve to undertake gold standard measurements (A-Ci curves, or R d measurements) just to test whether predictions are coherent. For example, a solution would be to measure and compare hyperspectral data with standard measurements using cultivars identified as extremes with hyperspectral data just to test that standard measurements identify them as extremes.
High-Throughput Phenotyping Methods to Estimate Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters
Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements are based on capturing and measuring the light re-emitted by chlorophylls during a return from an excited to a non-excited state. Researchers measure chlorophyll fluorescence using different approaches: (1) After the leaf has been stimulated by solar radiation, and called “Solar Induced Fluorescence” (SIF). (2) After stimulation of the leaf with a light beam of known intensity and wavelength, and measurement at specific wavelengths, here referred to as “chlorophyll fluorescence.”
Solar Induced Fluorescence
As previously mentioned, reflected light from vegetation can provide information about various plant traits. Light reflected from plants contains light remitted by chlorophyll that contributes to the reflectance signature. Chlorophyll remits absorbed light (fluorescence) at peak wavelengths of 690 and 740 nm associated with PSII and PSI, respectively ( Krause and Weis, 1984 ). The reflectance signature of leaves is an outcome of various parameters that influence how incoming radiation is reflected. The deconvolution of reflectance and fluorescence can be observed in absorption bands of oxygen (centered at 687 and 760.4 nm) and hydrogen (centered at 656.4 nm) where solar radiation is absorbed by the atmosphere ( Meroni et al., 2009 ). Reflectance recorded near these wavebands is from chlorophyll fluorescence and thus, it is possible to passively measure the amount of fluorescence being emitted from plant tissues while solar radiation is reaching the plants.
Multispectral measuring methods of SIF require the incident solar irradiance to be obtained along with the vegetative reflectance after which SIF is calculated by comparing the relative increase between a wavelength in and out of the absorption band ( Carter et al., 1990 ). SIF can be also calculated using hyperspectral reflectance spectroscopy as it contains more information in the multitude of wavelengths ( Alonso et al., 2008 ). However, the fluorescence measured under these conditions is a complex outcome of physiological processes. Previous studies have shown how SIF can be used to obtain information about photosynthesis ( Rosema et al., 1998 ; Flexas et al., 2002 ; Evain et al., 2004 ). SIF can be measured remotely by satellites and at nearer to ground levels using multispectral and hyperspectral platforms. These multispectral and hyperspectral methods are especially amenable to high-throughput analyses and can be incorporated into different HTP platforms such as aerial drones ( Sankaran et al., 2015 ; Kanning et al., 2018 ), tractors ( Scotford and Miller, 2004 ; Andrade-Sanchez et al., 2014 ), and carts ( Thompson et al., 2018 ). Previously, SIF had been shown to be correlated with canopy photosynthesis ( Yang et al., 2015 ) and used to estimate gross primary productivity ( Bacour et al., 2019 ). Passive measurements of photosynthetic traits like SIF can be carried out extremely rapidly and at multiple times during the growing season.
Chlorophyll fluorescence is an important tool used to investigate the light-dependent reactions of photosynthesis. This is achieved by removing or drastically decreasing one of the three routes of absorbed light energy. Without the addition of herbicides that inhibit PSII, this is achieved by applying a short saturating flash to the photosynthetic sample. With a short enough flash, no changes to non-photochemical quenching or photosynthetic efficiency occur and this allows the fluorescence maximum to be reached that can, with other fluorescence measurements, provide information about PSII efficiency ( Maxwell and Johnson, 2000 ).
The commercial availability of handheld fluorometers has allowed researchers to use chlorophyll fluorescence measurements to study the effects of various stresses on the light-dependent reactions including nitrogen availability ( Huang et al., 2004 ), salinity ( Belkhodja et al., 1994 ), heat ( Pastenes and Horton, 1996 ), cold ( Fracheboud et al., 1999 ), and drought ( Meyer and Genty, 1999 ; Sánchez-Rodríguez et al., 1999 ). While the use of such fluorometers in the field has yielded valuable information, throughput is limited by the time required to walk from one plant to another and to initiate a new measurement. Additionally, the time frame in which photosynthetic traits are somewhat stable limits when measurements can be collected depending on the aim of the experiment. Because chlorophyll fluorescence is changing in response to irradiance, large data collections that span several hours can be influenced by when measurements were obtained ( Huang et al., 2006 ). To avoid incorporating a large source of error, timing the measurements around solar noon, when chlorophyll fluorescence is relatively stable, produces better quality data. That said, several chlorophyll fluorescence studies involving large populations of genotypes have provided genetic information that could be used to improve photosynthesis and crop production ( Guo et al., 2008 ; Kiani et al., 2008 ; Azam et al., 2015 ; Herritt et al., 2018 ).
Imaging-based methods for measuring chlorophyll fluorescence allow spatial details of leaf and plant canopy fluorescence that handheld devices cannot provide. This approach requires that the whole imaging area is provided with a rapid, homogenous, and saturating light flash. Thus, the field of view for the imaging system will dictate the number of light sources required to saturate the leaf area being imaged. Several studies have shown the sensitivity of fluorescence imaging concerning pathogen interactions ( Meyer et al., 2001 ; Chaerle et al., 2004 , 2007 ). More recently, several companies have offered systems that can obtain chlorophyll fluorescence images. However, the deployment of these and other custom-built systems in field experiments is often difficult. To achieve a high-throughput capacity with fluorescence imaging, automated systems that move the imaging system to the plants or move the plants to the imaging system are required ( Fahlgren et al., 2015 ; Virlet et al., 2017 ). With the incorporation of such automated systems, chlorophyll fluorescence imaging can provide spatial information about the efficiency of the light-dependent reactions within large plant populations.
One emerging improvement in chlorophyll fluorometry is the use of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) to provide fast and repetitive flashes of sub-saturating light to obtain information about the primary electron acceptor of PSII as well as the reduction of the PQ pool. Previous fluorescence measurement methods relied on saturating light pulses to measure the relative changes in fluorescence required to describe biophysical and physiological aspects of photosynthesis ( Avenson and Saathoff, 2018 ). The use of LEDs has allowed the development of multiphase flash techniques that use short sub-saturating light flashes to achieve a complete reduction of PSII primary quinone acceptors and PSII acceptor pools ( Loriaux et al., 2013 ). Multiphase flash chlorophyll fluorescence allows for a more accurate measurement of light-adapted maximum fluorescence (F m ’). Despite these improvements, the multiphase flash technique has not been incorporated into HTP. The potential for high-throughput measurements has been realized with the fast repetition rate (FRR) protocol thus allowing for extremely rapid measurements of fluorescence (<0.2 s) ( Kolber et al., 1998 ). The combination of LED systems with FRR capability into laser or light-induced fluorescence transient (LIFT) instruments can provide high-throughput fluorescence data. Thus, LIFT systems have been incorporated into HTP systems and used in the field and controlled environments to collect plant fluorescence data ( Keller et al., 2018 ).
Modeling Photosynthesis in Crop Growth Models
Over the last five decades, many crop growth models have been developed and applied to simulate agricultural production systems and to forecast crop yields ( Priesack and Gayler, 2009 ). In particular, during the last years, a selection of these models have been tested and compared to characterize their ability to simulate crop production at different sites across the globe situated in different continents and representing different climatic conditions for major crops such as wheat ( Asseng et al., 2013 ), maize ( Bassu et al., 2014 ), rice ( Li T. et al., 2015 ), and potato ( Fleisher et al., 2017 ). The aim was also to apply the models to estimate possible future impacts of a changing climate on global crop production and grain yields ( Asseng et al., 2019 ; Liu Y. et al., 2019 ).
Almost all crop growth models aim to estimate the carbon gain for biomass production at the field level based on models of photosynthesis and radiation absorbed by the canopy. Many models assume a linear relationship between net primary biomass production (NPP) and the photoactive radiation absorbed by the crop canopy ( R PAR ). Models such as APSIM, CERES, EPIC, SALUS, LINTUL, Sirius, and STICS ( Asseng et al., 2013 supplement, Bassu et al., 2014 supplement) follow the so-called “big-leaf” approach, where the whole canopy is treated as if it was one big leaf and photosynthetic carbon gain is described by the light-use-efficiency model. It is defined by the following direct proportionality with the parameterε LUE , the light-use-efficiency, representing all photosynthetic and respiratory processes ( Medlyn, 1998 ):
where NPP denotes net primary production [g m –2 d –1 ], R PAR is absorbed photoactive radiation [MJ m –2 d –1 ] and ε LUE is light-use-efficiency [g MJ –1 ].
Other models such as Ecosys, ExpertN-SPASS, GECROS, HERMES, IXIM, LPJml, MCWLA, MONICA, SUCROS, WOFOST ( Asseng et al., 2013 supplement, Bassu et al., 2014 supplement) simulate the photosynthesis rate of the canopy based on single leaf photosynthesis rates. This is achieved in three major steps by calculating (i) single leaf photosynthesis per leaf area of each leaf, (ii) the instantaneous photosynthesis rate of the whole canopy at given light conditions by integration over the canopy depth and plant leaf areas at each depth, (iii) the daily canopy photosynthesis by integration over the day. In these models, a distinction is made between shaded and sunlit leaves ( Spitters, 1986 ; Goudriaan and van Laar, 1994 ; Wang and Leuning, 1998 ) and leaf photosynthesis is calculated for each leaf type separately. This modeling approach is known as the “two-leaf” model.
A further type of canopy photosynthesis model distinguishes different leaf classes depending on their height in the canopy above the soil surface and it is called the “multi-layer” model ( Leuning et al., 1995 ).
Besides the availability of light and CO 2 , the impact of air temperature and the supply of water and nitrogen on leaf photosynthesis have to be modeled depending on the modeling approach at either canopy or both at the leaf and canopy-scales.
Leaf Photosynthesis Rate Models
In the case of the “big-leaf” approach, as with the LINTUL model, the daily net gain of carbon for biomass growth is described by:
where μ B is the daily net carbon gain of the canopy biomass [g m –2 d –1 ], ε LUE the light-use-efficiency [g MJ –1 ], R PAR the absorbed photoactive radiation [MJ m –2 d –1 ], α ext the light extinction coefficient, f LAI the leaf area index, f CO 2 the impact factor of atmospheric CO 2 concentration, f S the impact factor of senescence, f T the impact factor of daily average air temperature, f ϑ the impact factor of available soil water content, and f N the impact factor of available soil nitrogen. In a similar way this approach is used in the CERES model, where only the term representing the absorbed global radiation takes an empirically derived exponential form, i.e:
In cases of the “two-leaf” or the “multi-layer” approach, the description of leaf photosynthesis rates again follows the general scheme given by a maximal rate of carbon gain and additional reduction factors representing environmental conditions which are not often in an optimal state to allow maximal photosynthesis:
where P gm denotes the gross leaf photosynthesis rate at light saturation [kg CO 2 m –2 d –1 ] and P gmax the maximal gross leaf photosynthesis rate [kg CO 2 m –2 d –1 ] with impact factors of CO 2 , senescence S, temperature T, soil water ϑ and soil nitrogen availability N .
This scheme is similar to the mechanistic description of growth rates, which change by the impact of environmental factors, formulated in analogy to mechanics, i.e., to the description of the velocity change of a moving particle due to forces acting on the particle ( Priesack et al., 2012 ).
The gross leaf photosynthesis rate P gl [kg CO 2 m – 2 d – 1 ] is then given by accounting for the absorbed photoactive radiation R PAR [MJ m – 2 d – 1 ] and by applying the light-use-efficiency parameter ε PAR [kg CO 2 MJ – 1 ] of photosynthesis and the gross photosynthesis rate at light saturation P gm [kg CO 2 m – 2 d – 1 ]:
Whole Canopy Photosynthesis Rate Models
The up-scaling calculation from leaf photosynthesis rate to whole canopy photosynthesis rate for a given time during the day often follows the method of Spitters et al. (1989) . It is assumed that light-use-efficiency of photosynthesis ε PAR and gross photosynthesis at light saturation P gm are constant within the canopy. In a first step, photosynthesis rates of shaded and sunlit leaves at each depth of the canopy are calculated separately. In the case of sunlit leaves, an additional integration over the leaf angle distribution is performed to include an averaged value of the adsorbed direct radiation for the estimation of sunlit leaf photosynthesis rates at different canopy depths. Finally, the integration over the canopy depth of the photosynthesis rates of both sunlit plus shaded leaves gives gross canopy photosynthesis at any given time during the day.
P g,l,z [g CO 2 m – 2 d – 1 ] denotes the total photosynthesis at depth z of the canopy given by the fraction of sunlit leaves f slt,z at depth z and the gross photosynthesis of sunlit Pg , slt , z or shaded leaves P g,shd,z :
Since the integration over the cumulative leaf area index f LAI,z at canopy depth z from zero at the soil surface to the total leaf area index f LAI of the canopy corresponds to the integration over the canopy height, the total gross photosynthesis of the canopy P g can be calculated using:
The daily gross photosynthesis and hence the daily amount of assimilated carbon by the canopy is then estimated by integration over the day length ( Spitters et al., 1989 ) from the time of sunrise t 0 to the time of sunset t 1 :
Gaussian integration is usually applied as a fast and accurate method to calculate both instantaneous and daily canopy photosynthesis ( Goudriaan, 1986 ; Spitters, 1986 ).
In the case of the GECROS model, upscaling from the leaf transpiration as determined by leaf stomatal conductance from either sunlit or shaded leaves to the whole canopy transpiration is achieved by the same integration procedures ( Yin and van Laar, 2005 ).
Impact Factors of Temperature, Atmospheric CO 2 Concentration, Soil Water, and Soil Nitrogen Availability
Besides the differences between “big-leaf,” “two-leaf,” and “multi-layer” approaches, crop growth models mainly differ in their choice of impact functions.
The impact functions of air temperature are well documented in the supplementary information of Wang et al. (2017) an will not be mentioned further here.
To simulate the impact of atmospheric CO 2 concentration on photosynthesis, strongly different approaches have been incorporated into crop growth models especially if CO 2 enrichment experiments are considered. In the case of the “big-leaf” approach, the CO 2 impact factor is either a linear or a curvilinear multiplier leading to an increase of light-use-efficiency ( Tubiello and Ewert, 2002 ), as in several models including CERES, Cropsyst, EPIC, Sirius and STICS ( Vanuytrecht and Thorburn, 2017 ). In the case of leaf scale photosynthesis models, common and often documented approaches are the biochemical model of leaf photosynthesis of Farquhar et al. (1980) for C 3 plants and an equivalent version by Yin and Struik (2009) for C 4 plants. Both models are based on the calculation of intercellular CO 2 concentration and require the incorporation of a stomatal conductance model. However, for both photosynthesis models, several parameters have to be determined and the application of the model can be difficult. A simpler approach for leaf-level photosynthesis is the empirically determined increase of light-saturated photosynthetic rate prescribed by the impact factor f CO_2 in eq. (4). Additionally, photosynthetic light-use-efficiency ε PAR can be modeled as influenced by atmospheric CO 2 concentrations ( Nendel et al., 2009 ) and it is increased if higher CO 2 concentrations occur ( Vanuytrecht and Thorburn, 2017 ). In contrast, the more complex structure of the GECROS model can simulate the acclimation of photosynthesis to higher CO 2 levels, which has been observed in FACE experiments. This good model performance is based on a better consideration of plant internal C−N interactions ( Thornley, 1998 , 2004 ) within the GECROS model ( Biernath et al., 2013 ; Yin, 2013 ).
In several models, the impact factor of water availability on photosynthesis is set equal to the ratio of actual to potential evapotranspiration, which then reduces canopy light-use-efficiency or the maximal leaf photosynthesis rate if the actual transpiration, i.e., the root water uptake, is less than the potential demand. It is assumed that stomatal closure is controlled by the balance between available soil water and water demand caused by atmospheric conditions ( Tubiello and Ewert, 2002 ). Less simple approaches calculate leaf stomatal conductance, which decreases under water stress, and thus limits photosynthetic rates by reducing CO 2 entry into leaves or fluxes within the canopy. This has to be based on simulations of energy balance either at the leaf or canopy level to adequately represent the impact of atmospheric conditions that determine transpiration demand.
Similar to the very simple approach to account for water availability, the impact factor of nitrogen availability can be defined as the ratio of actual nitrogen demand versus optimal nitrogen supply. This is often calculated as the ratio of the difference between actual and minimal nitrogen content about the difference between optimal and minimal nitrogen content of either the leaf in the case of leaf photosynthesis or of the aboveground canopy biomass in the case of canopy photosynthesis. It is assumed that nitrogen contents are not optimal if the mineral nitrogen uptake from the soil cannot fulfill plant nitrogen demand given as the sum of the differences between actual and optimal concentrations in the plant organs ( Priesack and Gayler, 2009 ). More complex nitrogen uptake models can also simulate the observed increase in photosynthetic nitrogen-use-efficiency and decreased tissue N concentrations at elevated [CO 2 ] ( Biernath et al., 2013 ; Vanuytrecht and Thorburn, 2017 ). This is achieved for example by incorporating a functional balance between root N acquisition and shoot C gain in GECROS ( Yin and van Laar, 2005 ; Priesack and Gayler, 2009 ), or by including an adaptation of photosynthetic N demand to atmospheric [CO 2 ] as in the growth model AgPasture of APSIM ( Cullen et al., 2009 ).
Most of the considered crop models are source driven assuming growth limitation by the supply of assimilates. Therefore, approaches to model either positive or negative environmental impacts on yields by factors increasing or reducing maximal leaf photosynthesis rate or crop light-use-efficiency strongly determine the simulation of crop growth. Determination of these factors needs numerous field experiments and extensive testing to provide a sound basis for adequate simulations of impacts on crop growth. By this rather simple and parsimonious approach, crop growth is conceived as carbon-source driven and described by balancing gains from assimilation and losses through respiration and plant tissue abscission.
Metabolic Engineering to Improve Photosynthesis and Elevated CO 2 Acclimation
As already stated in this review, improving photosynthesis has become a major aim for increasing plant yield (example: the RIPE project 2 ) ( Long et al., 2015 ; Ort et al., 2015 ; Simkin et al., 2019 ; Weber and Bar-Even, 2019 ). To date, targets to achieve this include: RuBisCO properties and activation, RuBP regeneration, photorespiration, CO 2 availability by improving mesophyll conductance and by introducing CO 2 concentrating mechanisms based on cyanobacterial, algal and C4-plant systems, photoprotection by modifying the relaxation of energy quenching processes, and by optimizing crop canopies to improve light capture (see Ort et al., 2015 ). Already, several studies have provided support by demonstrating that modifying photosynthetic processes through genetic engineering can improve photosynthetic CO 2 assimilation rates and yield potential (see reviews by Simkin et al., 2019 ; Weber and Bar-Even, 2019 ). Several major examples are highlighted below and include improving RuBP regeneration by overexpressing selected Calvin cycle enzymes and modifying photorespiration by creating artificial glycolate-metabolizing bypass pathways in the chloroplast (see Figure 4 ). These processes were found to be amongst the best targets to improve photosynthesis CO 2 assimilation efficiency after in silico modeling studies pin-pointed SBPase, fructose bisphosphate aldolase (FBPA), and photorespiration as potential limiting reactions ( Zhu et al., 2007 ).
Figure 4. A simplified scheme highlighting tested ways to increase photosynthesis and crop yield by overexpressing selected Calvin cycle enzymes and by creating synthetic chloroplastic photorespiratory bypasses. The enzymes in green circles/squares have been overexpressing either individually or together. Details of the different photorespiratory pathways can be found in the main text: 1 is based on the bacterial glycerate pathway leading to 3-PGA from glycolate ( Kebeish et al., 2007 ; Dalal et al., 2015 ), 2 is an incomplete glycerate pathway leading to glyoxylate from glycolate ( Nölke et al., 2014 ), 3 are pathways leading to the production of CO 2 from glycolate ( Maier et al., 2012 ; Shen et al., 2019 ; South et al., 2019 ). The transporter in the red circle was repressed to improve photorespiratory bypasses (see South et al., 2019 ). Abbreviations can be found in the main text.
Plants over-expressing the redox-regulated Calvin cycle enzyme SBPase show improved photosynthetic activities and increased biomass. This has been seen to occur in Arabidopsis thaliana ( Simkin et al., 2017a ), tobacco ( Lefebvre et al., 2005 ; Rosenthal et al., 2011 ; Simkin et al., 2015 ), tomato ( Ding et al., 2016 ), and wheat ( Driever et al., 2017 ). However, beneficial effects were found to be dependent on both developmental stage and growth conditions. An increase in photosynthesis was only observed in young expanding tobacco leaves but not in fully expanded ones and no effect on photosynthesis was seen when plants were grown under short days and low light ( Lefebvre et al., 2005 ). When tobacco over-expressing Arabidopsis SBPase was grown outside under elevated CO 2 (585 ppm) an increase in photosynthesis and biomass was observed when compared to wild-type plants ( Rosenthal et al., 2011 ). However, the increase in biomass was only 50% of the theoretical value due to C3-plant acclimation to elevated CO 2 (see below). Furthermore, higher CO 2 assimilation rates were variable over the growing season with no significant increase observed in August compared to July. Cyanobacterial and green algal Calvin cycle enzymes have also been used to improve plant productivity. The overexpression of either Chlamydomonas SBPase or cyanobacterial FBPase led to increases in both photosynthesis and biomass ( Tamoi et al., 2006 ). A cyanobacterial bifunctional SBPase/FBPase enzyme has been overexpressed also in tobacco ( Miyagawa et al., 2001 ), lettuce ( Ichikawa et al., 2010 ), and soybean ( Köhler et al., 2017 ) with increases in photosynthetic CO 2 fixation and biomass. In the work of Köhler et al. (2017) , soybean overexpressing cyanobacterial SBPase/FBPase was grown in the field during three seasons under elevated CO 2 (600 ppm) and elevated temperature (+3°C) and compared to normal ambient conditions. Across the different treatments, the over-expressing lines exhibited higher carbon assimilation rates. Under ambient CO 2 , elevated temperature led to seed yield reductions in both control and transgenic genotypes. However, under elevated CO 2 and high temperature, the SBPase/FBPase plants maintained higher seed yield levels, while WT plants had reduced seed yields, compared with plants grown under only high CO 2 . Therefore, perhaps Calvin cycle manipulation can offset the detrimental effects of future climate change conditions. Improved biomass has been observed also when overexpressing FBPA in tobacco ( Uematsu et al., 2012 ) and the positive effect on photosynthesis and biomass was more pronounced when plants were grown at elevated CO 2 (700 ppm). When Arabidopsis FBPA was overexpressed in the photosynthetic tissues of Arabidopsis using a RuBisCO small subunit 2A promoter, similar increases in photosynthesis, dry weight, and seed yield occurred ( Simkin et al., 2017a ). However, when overexpression of SBPase and FBPA were stacked in Arabidopsis, no significant additional increases in maximal efficiency of CO 2 assimilation rate (A max ), dry weight and seed yield were observed when compared to individual transgene overexpressing lines ( Simkin et al., 2017a ).
Another major strategy for improving photosynthesis has been a synthetic biology approach to express within the chloroplast an alternative pathway to efficiently metabolize photorespiratory glycolate and thus alleviate the potential inhibitory action of 2-PG on photosynthesis, while preventing ammonium release and limiting CO 2 release to the chloroplast where RuBisCO is located ( Figure 4 ). Since the first report ( Kebeish et al., 2007 ), several photorespiratory bypass strategies have been used to improve photosynthetic CO 2 assimilation and biomass. The initial bypass tested was based on the bacterial glycerate pathway where glyoxylate was converted to glycerate by two enzymes; glyoxylate carboligase and tartronate semialdehyde reductase ( Figure 4 , pathway 1). The conversion of glycolate to glyoxylate in the chloroplast was achieved by expressing a bacterial glycolate dehydrogenase (GlycDH). When expressed in Arabidopsis chloroplasts, transgenic lines produced bigger rosettes and more biomass while increasing A max ( Kebeish et al., 2007 ). A similar strategy was used to increase biomass and seed yield in Camelina sativa ( Dalal et al., 2015 ). Bacterial GlycDH alone was introduced into Solanum tuberosum using a single construct to produce a polyprotein to circumvent instability problems ( Nölke et al., 2014 ). These potato lines exhibited an enhanced A max at 400 ppm CO 2 (but not when measured at 2000 ppm CO 2 ) and an increase in tuber yield even though the complete glycerate pathway had not been introduced ( Figure 4 , pathway 2). This was observed also for GlycDH-expressing Arabidopsis ( Kebeish et al., 2007 ) and Camelina sativa ( Dalal et al., 2015 ). Another successful photorespiratory bypass was achieved by expressing glycolate oxidase, catalase and malate synthase in chloroplasts ( Maier et al., 2012 ). Such a bypass has the potential to completely oxidize glycolate to CO 2 and it led to increases in leaf dry weight and net CO 2 fixation rates ( Figure 4 pathway 3). More recently, another chloroplastic photorespiratory bypass (named the GOC bypass) was expressed in rice to increase photosynthetic efficiency ( Shen et al., 2019 ). It consisted of three rice enzymes; glycolate oxidase, oxalate oxidase, and catalase expressed in chloroplasts and designed to lead to the complete oxidation of glycolate to CO 2 ( Figure 4 pathway 3). Improved photosynthetic efficiency, biomass, and yield were found in both greenhouse and field experiments although there were differences according to seeding season and it was more advantageous under high light. To improve flux through chloroplastic photorespiratory bypasses, glycolate export out of the chloroplast was manipulated by down-regulating PLGG1 (a plastidial glycolate/glycerate transporter, Pick et al., 2013 ; South et al., 2019 ). The best results were obtained with a variant of the glycolate oxidation pathway where glycolate oxidase was replaced by Chlamydomonas reinhardtii GlycDH ( Figure 4 , pathway 3). Field-grown tobacco expressing this version of an alternative photorespiratory pathway exhibited a >25% increase in total vegetative biomass (without PLGG1 inhibition) and a 40% increase (with inhibited PLGG1) although the impact on net CO 2 assimilation was quite low (5−8%) and no significant increase in seed yield was observed ( South et al., 2019 ).
The over-expression of specific photorespiratory enzymes has also led to increased biomass, A max , and grain yield. This was observed when mitochondrial serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT1) was overexpressed in rice ( Wu et al., 2015 ) and when individual glycine decarboxylase (GDC) subunits were overexpressed in Arabidopsis either the H-protein ( Timm et al., 2012 ) or the L-protein ( Timm et al., 2015 ; Figure 4 ). When the H-protein was overexpressed in tobacco, improved biomass was only observed when under the control of a leaf-specific promoter and this only became significant at high light intensities while constitutively overexpressed H-protein led to a detrimental growth effect ( López-Calcagno et al., 2019 ). In gene stacking experiments, the additional overexpression of the H-protein in Arabidopsis lines overexpressing SBPase and FBPA led to further improvements in seed weight per plant (under high light growth conditions) and leaf area with no further increase in A max compared to SBPase-FBPA lines alone ( Simkin et al., 2017a ).
Improved photosynthesis has also been found in plants where the light-side of photosynthesis has been manipulated. In Arabidopsis, the overexpression of the Rieske-FeS protein of the cytb 6 f complex led to plants exhibiting increased A max , dry weight, leaf area and seed yield ( Simkin et al., 2017b ). Photosynthesis was improved also under fluctuating light conditions by overexpressing violaxanthin de-epoxidase, zeaxanthin epoxidase and PsbS , all components of a photoprotection mechanism involving light energy dissipation as heat ( Kromdijk et al., 2016 ). Field-grown tobacco plants overexpressing these three proteins showed increases in dry weight, leaf area and plant height ( Kromdijk et al., 2016 ).
As mentioned above, certain strategies to improve photosynthesis and yield have already been tested under one or more climate change condition(s) such as elevated temperature and CO 2 levels. In general, increased temperatures of only several °C have been shown to cancel the beneficial effects of elevated CO 2 (see Köhler et al., 2017 ). Multiple FACE experiments (carried out at around 600 ppm CO 2 ) have consistently shown that the increase in C3-crop yield in response to long-term elevated CO 2 conditions is 50% lower than predicted due to photosynthetic acclimation (see Ainsworth and Long, 2005 ; Kant et al., 2012 ). Many C3-plant species only exhibit a small 15% increase in yield compared to a hypothetical 40% increase under predicted climate change CO 2 levels. This yield response to elevated CO 2 has been observed in both controlled growth conditions and FACE experiments (see Leakey et al., 2009 and references therein) where a significant reduction in N-content was also reported ( Ainsworth and Long, 2005 ; Vicente et al., 2015 ). This underachievement of certain C3 model plants like Arabidopsis thaliana and major C3-cereal plants including wheat and rice to elevated CO 2 is due to modifications in plant metabolism, physiology, and development where acclimation is associated with a negative impact on leaf photosynthesis ( Ainsworth and Rogers, 2007 ), root nitrate uptake and leaf nitrate assimilation ( Rachmilevitch et al., 2004 ; Bloom et al., 2010 ), thus reducing the expected benefits of elevated CO 2 . It includes a reduction in RuBisCO protein content, a reduction in stomatal conductance, and decreases in both photosynthetic and N-assimilation gene expression (e.g., Vicente et al., 2015 ) that brings about a reduction in leaf and seed N-content. In the literature, photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO 2 has been explained by the inhibition of photosynthetic gene expression due to the accumulation of excess non-structural carbohydrates in source leaves ( Moore et al., 1999 ; Ruiz-Vera et al., 2017 ). However, it is possible that this acclimation is also driven by N-limitations when N-assimilation cannot keep up with the increased C-assimilation rates. It has also been suggested that at elevated CO 2 , a decrease in photorespiration impacts negatively both nitrate uptake and assimilation ( Bloom, 2015 ). Several factors have been proposed to influence acclimation to elevated CO 2 , such as sink strength, sugar signaling, and N-regime (see Long et al., 2004 and references therein). Several papers have suggested a link between improved sink strength and a reduction of this acclimation in tobacco ( Ruiz-Vera et al., 2017 ), rice ( Zhu et al., 2014 ), barley ( Torralbo et al., 2019 ), and Larrea tridentata ( Aranjuelo et al., 2011 ). Although a number of actors in sugar signaling and sensing are known (see Pego et al., 2000 ), a lack of information on how they are affected by elevated CO 2 , especially in roots, has been stated ( Thompson et al., 2017 ). This is similar to nitrate-signaling where actors of perception, signal transduction and even root to shoot communication have been discovered (see Wang et al., 2018 ) but little is known about how elevated CO 2 and other climate change factors affect such processes. Indeed, to date, there is no global understanding of the regulatory networks involved in the acclimation processes occurring to balance plant C and N metabolism under elevated CO 2 . That said, a recent work using correlation network analyses confirmed the tight coordination between C and N metabolisms while carbohydrate levels were linked to the down-regulation of both photosynthetic and N metabolism genes ( Vicente et al., 2018 ).
When light is saturating, photosynthesis can be limited by several factors including V cmax (amount and maximal carboxylase activity of RuBisCO), RuBP regeneration, triose-phosphate utilization/carbohydrate export (source-sink properties) and, of course, photorespiration. Under future climate conditions of elevated CO 2 and temperature, major limitations will probably shift to RuBP regeneration and source-sink properties. Under elevated CO 2 , plants reduce RuBisCO amounts since it is no longer a limiting factor but they need to improve their photosynthetic electron transport properties to produce enough NADPH and ATP to regenerate RuBP via the Calvin cycle. Less RuBisCO is a common feature of elevated CO 2 acclimation in C3-cereals while N reallocations to improve the light reactions are not adequate and there is an overall reduction in plant N-content.
Predicted climate change conditions of elevated CO 2 and temperature have been shown to affect the benefits of improved photosynthesis by current genetic manipulations, as mentioned above ( Rosenthal et al., 2011 ; Köhler et al., 2017 ). That said, strategies used to improve RuBP regeneration have often given rise to the best increases in photosynthesis and yields under either elevated CO 2 or high light or both (see above). However, strategies to reduce the negative impact of photorespiratory carbon recycling might be expected to have a lesser impact under conditions that lower photorespiration like elevated CO 2 although benefits may still occur under elevated temperatures and high light in association with CO 2 . It is probable that C3-plant acclimation to future atmospheric CO 2 and temperature levels could hamper strategies to improve photosynthesis and yield of actual plant genotypes. Therefore, perhaps additional strategies to reduce C3-plant acclimation by deregulating plant functions associated with known acclimation processes might be required. This would require extensive omics analyses to identify the regulating gene networks and proteins involved in photosynthetic acclimation to climate change conditions, this could be helped by photosynthetic performance measurements in the field using non-destructive HTP techniques and platforms while the data sets could be used to improve plant growth models to predict the benefits. In this way, the best gene targets will be identified and tested to create new crops for the future.
MB and ÁS-S integrated the contributions. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
This work was supported by IRUEC project funded by EIG CONCERT-Japan 3rd Joint Call on “Food Crops and Biomass Production Technologies” under the Strategic International Research Cooperative Program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) and the Spanish Innovation and Universities Ministry (Acciones de programación conjunta Internacional, PCIN-2017-007), and by the ANR-14-CE19-0015 grant REGUL3P. A Grant for Promotion of KAAB Projects (Niigata University) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology-Japan is also acknowledged.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We apologize to all colleagues whose work was not referenced due to space constraints.
- ^ https://sites.google.com/site/ijmackay/work/magic
- ^ http://ripe.illinois.edu/
Abdurakhmonov, I. Y., Buriev, Z. T., Saha, S., Jenkins, J. N., Abdukarimov, A., and Pepper, A. E. (2014). Phytochrome RNAi enhances major fibre quality and agronomic traits of the cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. Nat. Commun. 5:3062. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4062
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Adachi, S., Nakae, T., Uchida, M., Soda, K., Takai, T., Oi, T., et al. (2013). The mesophyll anatomy enhancing CO2 diffusion is a key trait for improving rice photosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 1061–1072. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers382
Adachi, S., Tsuru, Y., Nito, N., Murata, K., Yamamoto, T., Ebitani, T., et al. (2011). Identification and characterization of genomic regions on chromosomes 4 and 8 that control the rate of photosynthesis in rice leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 1927–1938. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq387
Adachi, S., Yamamoto, T., Nakae, T., Yamashita, M., Uchida, M., Karimata, R., et al. (2019). Genetic architecture of leaf photosynthesis in rice revealed by different types of reciprocal mapping populations. J. Exp. Bot. 70, 5131–5144. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz303
Adachi, S., Yoshikawa, K., Yamanouchi, U., Tanabata, T., Sun, J., Ookawa, T., et al. (2017). Fine mapping of Carbon Assimilation Rate 8, a quantitative trait locus for flag leaf nitrogen content, stomatal conductance and photosynthesis in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 8:60. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00060
Ainsworth, E. A., and Long, S. P. (2005). What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol. 165, 351–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01224.x
Ainsworth, E. A., and Rogers, A. (2007). The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 258–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01641.x
Ainsworth, E. A., Rogers, A., Nelson, R., and Long, S. P. (2004). Testing the “source–sink” hypothesis of down-regulation of photosynthesis in elevated [CO2] in the field with single gene substitutions in Glycine max . Agric. Forest Meteor. 122, 85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.09.002
Ainsworth, E. A., Serbin, S. P., Skoneczka, J. A., and Townsend, P. A. (2014). Using leaf optical properties to detect ozone effects on foliar biochemistry. Photosynth. Res. 119, 65–76. doi: 10.1007/s11120-013-9837-y
Ainsworth, E. A., Yendrek, C. R., Sitch, S., Collins, W. J., and Emberson, L. D. (2013). The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and implications for climate change. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 63, 637–661. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103829
Alonso, L., Gomez-Chova, L., Vila-Frances, J., Amoros-Lopez, J., Guanter, L., Calpe, J., et al. (2008). Improved fraunhofer line discrimination method for vegetation fluorescence quantification. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 5, 620–624. doi: 10.1109/lgrs.2008.2001180
Ameztoy, K., Baslam, M., Sánchez-López, ÁM., Muñoz, F. J., Bahaji, A., Almagro, G., et al. (2019). Plant responses to fungal volatiles involve global posttranslational thiol redox proteome changes that affect photosynthesis. Plant. Cell Environ. 42:13601. doi: 10.1111/pce.13601
Andrade-Sanchez, P., Gore, M. A., Heun, J. T., Thorp, K. R., Carmo-Silva, A. E., French, A. N., et al. (2014). Development and evaluation of a field-based high-throughput phenotyping platform. Funct. Plant Biol. 41, 68–79.
Ansong, C., Sadler, N. C., Hill, E. A., Lewis, M. P., Zink, E. M., Smith, R. D., et al. (2014). Characterization of protein redox dynamics induced during light-to-dark transitions and nutrient limitation in cyanobacteria. Front. Microbiol. 5:325. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00325
Aranjuelo, I., Ebbets, A. L., Evans, R. D., Tissue, D. T., Nogués, S., van Gestel, N., et al. (2011). Maintenance of C sinks sustains enhanced C assimilation during long-term exposure to elevated [CO2] in Mojave Desert shrubs. Oecologia 167, 339–354. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-1996-y
Aranjuelo, I., Pardo, A., Biel, C., Savé, R., Azcón-Bieto, J., and Nogués, S. (2009). Leaf carbon management in slow-growing plants exposed to elevated CO2. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 97–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01829.x
Aranjuelo, I., Sanz-Saez, A., Jauregui, I., Irigoyen, J. J., Araus, J. L., Sanchez- Diaz, M., et al. (2013). Harvest index, a parameter conditioning responsiveness of wheat plants to elevated CO2. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 1879–1892. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert081
Araus, J. L., and Cairns, J. E. (2014). Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008
Araus, J. L., Kefauver, S. C., Zaman-Allah, M., Olsen, M. S., and Cairns, J. E. (2018). Translating high-throughput phenotyping into genetic gain. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 451–466. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.02.001
Arfan, M., Athar, H. R., and Ashraf, M. (2007). Does exogenous application of salicylic acid through the rooting medium modulate growth and photosynthetic capacity in two differently adapted spring wheat cultivars under salt stress? J. Plant Physiol. 164, 685–694. doi: 10.1016/J.JPLPH.2006.05.010
Aro, E.-M., Suorsa, M., Rokka, A., Allahverdiyeva, Y., Paakkarinen, V., Saleem, A., et al. (2004). Dynamics of photosystem II: a proteomic approach to thylakoid protein complexes. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 347–356. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri041
Asner, G. P., and Martin, R. E. (2008). Spectral and chemical analysis of tropical forests: Scaling from leaf to canopy levels. Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 3958–3970. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.07.003
Asner, G. P., and Martin, R. E. (2015). Spectroscopic remote sensing of nonstructural carbohydrates in forest canopies. Remote Sens. 7, 3526–3547. doi: 10.3390/rs70403526
Asner, G. P., Martin, R. E., Knapp, D. E., Tupayachi, R., Anderson, C., Carranza, L., et al. (2011). Spectroscopy of canopy chemicals in humid tropical forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 115, 3587–3598. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.020
Asseng, S., Ewert, F., Rosenzweig, C., Jones, J. W., Hatfield, J. L., Ruane, A., et al. (2013). Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change. Nat. Climate Change 3, 827–832.
Asseng, S., Martre, P., Maiorano, A., Rötter, R. P., O’Leary, G. J., Fitzgerald, G. J., et al. (2019). Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein. Glob. Chang Biol. 25, 155–173. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14481
Avenson, T. J., and Saathoff, A. J. (2018). Sub-Saturating Multiphase Flash Irradiances to Estimate Maximum Fluorescence Yield Photosynthesis. Cham: Springer, 105–120.
Azam, F., Chang, X., and Jing, R. (2015). Mapping QTL for chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters at seedling stage as indicators of heat tolerance in wheat. Euphytica 202, 245–258. doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1283-1
Bacour, C., Maignan, F., MacBean, N., Porcar-Castell, A., Flexas, J., Frankenberg, C., et al. (2019). Improving estimates of gross primary productivity by assimilating solar-induced fluorescence satellite retrievals in a terrestrial biosphere model using a process-based SIF model. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 124, 3281–3306. doi: 10.1029/2019jg005040
Baena-González, E., Baginsky, S., Mulo, P., Summer, H., Aro, E. M., and Link, G. (2002). Chloroplast transcription at different light intensities. Glutathione-mediated phosphorylation at the major RNA polymerase involved in redox-regulated organellar gene expression. Plant Physiol. 127, 1044–1052. doi: 10.1104/pp.010168
Baginsky, S., Tiller, K., Pfannschmidt, T., and Link, G. (1999). PTK, the chloroplast RNA polymerase-associated protein kinase from mustard ( Sinapis alba ), mediates redox control of plastid in vitro transcription. Plant Mol. Biol. 39, 1013–1023. doi: 10.1023/a:1006177807844
Balcerowicz, M., Ranjan, A., Rupprecht, L., Fiene, G., and Hoecker, U. (2014). Auxin represses stomatal development in dark-grown seedlings via Aux/IAA proteins. Development 141, 3165–3176. doi: 10.1242/dev.109181
Bandillo, N., Raghavan, C., Muyco, P. A., Sevilla, M. A. L., Lobina, I. T., Dilla-Ermita, C. J., et al. (2013). Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations in rice: progress and potential for genetics research and breeding. Rice 6:11. doi: 10.1186/1939-8433-6-11
Barabaschi, D., Tondelli, A., Desiderio, F., Volante, A., Vaccino, P., Valè, G., et al. (2016). Next generation breeding. Plant Sci. 242, 3–13. doi: 10.1016/J.PLANTSCI.2015.07.010
Baslam, M., Oikawa, K., Kitajima-Koga, A., Kaneko, K., and Mitsui, T. (2016). Golgi-to-plastid trafficking of proteins through secretory pathway: insights into vesicle-mediated import toward the plastids. Plant Signal. Behav. 11:e1221558. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2016.1221558
Bassu, S., Brisson, N., Durand, J.-L., Boote, K., Lizaso, J., Jones, J. W., et al. (2014). How do various maize crop models vary in their responses to climate change factors? Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2301–2320. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12520
Bastakis, E., Hedtke, B., Klermund, C., Grimm, B., and Schwechheimer, C. (2018). LLM-domain B-GATA transcription factors play multifaceted roles in controlling greening in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell 30, 582–599. doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00947
Bedell, V. M., Wang, Y., Campbell, J. M., Poshusta, T. L., Starker, C. G., Krug, R. G., et al. (2012). In vivo genome editing using a high-efficiency TALEN system. Nature 491, 114–118. doi: 10.1038/nature11537
Belkhodja, R., Morales, F., Abadia, A., Gomez-Aparisi, J., and Abadia, J. (1994). Chlorophyll fluorescence as a possible tool for salinity tolerance screening in barley ( Hordeum-vulgare L). Plant Physiol. 104, 667–673. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.2.667
Bernacchi, C. J., Morgan, P. B., Ort, D. R., and Long, S. P. (2005). The growth of soybean under free air [CO2] enrichment (FACE) stimulates photosynthesis while decreasing in vivo RuBisCO capacity. Planta 220, 434–446. doi: 10.1007/s00425-004-1320-8
Bernacchi, C. J., Pimentel, C., and Long, S. P. (2003). In vivo temperature response functions of parameters required to model RuBP-limited photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 26, 1419–1430. doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2003.01050.x
Betti, M., Bauwe, H., Busch, F. A., Fernie, A. R., Keech, O., Levey, M., et al. (2016). Manipulating photorespiration to increase plant productivity: recent advances and perspectives for crop improvement. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 2977–2988. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw076pmid:26951371
Bevan, M. W., Uauy, C., Wulff, B. B. H., Zhou, J., Krasileva, K., and Clark, M. D. (2017). Genomic innovation for crop improvement. Nature 543, 346–354.
Bierbaum, R. M., Holdren, J. P., MacCracken, M. C., Moss, R. H., and Raven, P. H. (2007). Confronting Climate Change: Avoiding the Unmanageable and Managing the Unavoidable. Washington, DC: The United Nations Foundation.
Biernath, C., Bittner, S., Klein, C., Gayler, S., Hentschel, R., Hoffmann, P., et al. (2013). Modeling acclimation of leaf photosynthesis to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Eur. J. Agron. 48, 74–87. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2013.02.008
Bloom, A. J. (2015). Photorespiration and nitrate assimilation: a major intersection between plant carbon and nitrogen. Photosynth. Res. 123, 117–128. doi: 10.1007/s11120-014-0056-y
Bloom, A. J., Burger, M., Rubio Asensio, J. S., and Cousins, A. B. (2010). Carbon dioxide enrichment inhibits nitrate assimilation in wheat and Arabidopsis . Science 328, 899–903. doi: 10.1126/science.1186440
Bracher, A., Whitney, S. M., Hartl, F. U., and Hayer-Hartl, M. (2017). Biogenesis and metabolic maintenance of RuBisCO. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 68, 29–60. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111633
Brenner, W. G., Ramireddy, E., Heyl, A., and Schmülling, T. (2012). Gene regulation by cytokinin in Arabidopsis . Front. Plant Sci. 3:8. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00008
Cabrera-Bosquet, L., Sanchez, C., Rosales, A., Palacios-Rojas, N., and Araus, J. L. (2011). Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) assessment of δ18O and nitrogen and ash contents for improved yield potential and drought adaptation in maize. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 467–474. doi: 10.1021/jf103395z
Cantalapiedra, C. P., Boudiar, R., Casas, A. M., Igartua, E., and Contreras-Moreira, B. (2015). BARLEY MAP: physical and genetic mapping of nucleotide sequences and annotation of surrounding loci in barley. Mol. Breed. 35:253.
Carter, G., Theisen, A., and Mitchell, R. (1990). Chlorophyll fluorescence measured using the Fraunhofer line-depth principle and relationship to photosynthetic rate in the field. Plant Cell Environ. 13, 79–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1990.tb01302.x
Casson, S. A., Franklin, K. A., Gray, J. E., Grierson, C. S., Whitelam, G. C., and Hetherington, A. M. (2009). phytochrome B and PIF4 regulate stomatal development in response to light quantity. Curr. Biol. 19, 229–234. doi: 10.1016/J.CUB.2008.12.046
Cavanagh, C., Morell, M., Mackay, I., and Powell, W. (2008). From mutations to MAGIC: resources for gene discovery, validation and delivery in crop plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11, 215–221. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.01.002
Černý, M., Dyčka, F., Bobál’ová, J., and Brzobohatý, B. (2011). Early cytokinin response proteins and phosphoproteins of Arabidopsis thaliana identified by proteome and phosphoproteome profiling. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 921–937. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq322
Ceusters, J., and Van de Poel, B. (2018). Ethylene exerts species-specific and age-dependent control of photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 176, 2601–2612. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01706
Chaerle, L., Hagenbeek, D., De Bruyne, E., Valcke, R., and Van Der Straeten, D. (2004). Thermal and chlorophyll-fluorescence imaging distinguish plant-pathogen interactions at an early stage. Plant Cell Physiol. 45, 887–896. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pch097
Chaerle, L., Hagenbeek, D., De Bruyne, E., and Van Der Straeten, D. (2007). Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging for disease-resistance screening of sugar beet. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 91, 97–106. doi: 10.1007/s11240-007-9282-9288
Chater, C., Peng, K., Movahedi, M., Dunn, J. A., Walker, H. J., Liang, Y.-K., et al. (2015). Elevated CO2-induced responses in stomata require ABA and ABA signaling. Curr. Biol. 25, 2709–2716. doi: 10.1016/J.CUB.2015.09.013
Chen, J., Burke, J. J., Velten, J., and Xin, Z. (2006). FtsH11 protease plays a critical role in Arabidopsis thermotolerance. Plant J. 48, 73–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02855.x
Cheng, F., Lu, J., Gao, M., Shi, K., Kong, Q., Huang, Y., et al. (2016). Redox signaling and CBF-responsive pathway are involved in salicylic acid-improved photosynthesis and growth under chilling stress in watermelon. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1519. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01519
Chiang, Y.-H., Zubo, Y. O., Tapken, W., Kim, H. J., Lavanway, A. M., Howard, L., et al. (2012). Functional characterization of the GATA transcription factors GNC and CGA1 reveals their key role in chloroplast development, growth, and division in Arabidopsis . Plant Physiol. 160, 332–348. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.198705
Chinnusamy, V., Ohta, M., Kanrar, S., Lee, B.-H., Hong, X., Agarwal, M., et al. (2003). ICE1: a regulator of cold-induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis . Genes Dev. 17, 1043–1054. doi: 10.1101/gad.1077503
Choquette, N. E., Ogut, F., Wertin, T. M., Montes, C. M., Sorgini, C. A., Morse, A. M., et al. (2019). Uncovering hidden genetic variation in photosynthesis of field-grown maize under ozone pollution. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 4327–4338. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14794
Clarke, S. M., Cristescu, S. M., Miersch, O., Harren, F. J. M., Wasternack, C., and Mur, L. A. J. (2009). Jasmonates act with salicylic acid to confer basal thermotolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana . New Phytol. 182, 175–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02735.x
Coast, A., Shah, S., Ivakov, A., Gaju, O., Wilson, P. B., Posch, B. C., et al. (2019). Predicting dark respiration rates of wheat leaves from hyperspectral reflectance. Plant Cell Environ. 42, 2133–2150. doi: 10.1111/pce.13544
Cobb, J. N., Biswas, P. S., and Platten, J. D. (2018). Back to the future: revisiting MAS as a tool for modern plant breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 132, 647–667. doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3266-4
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., et al. (2013). Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 15, 819–823.
Cortleven, A., Nitschke, S., Klaumuenzer, M., AbdElgawad, H., Asard, H., Grimm, B., et al. (2014). A novel protective function for cytokinin in the light stress response is mediated by the Arabidopsis histidine kinase2 and Arabidopsis histidine kinase3 receptors. Plant Physiol. 164, 1470–1483. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.224667
Cortleven, A., and Schmülling, T. (2015). Regulation of chloroplast development and function by cytokinin. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 4999–5013. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv132
Crossa, J., Pérez-Rodríguez, P., Cuevas, J., Montesinos-López, O., Jarquín, D., de Los Campos, G., et al. (2017). Genomic selection in plant breeding: methods, models, and perspectives. Trends Plant Sci. 22, 961–975.
Cullen, B. R., Johnson, I. R., Eckard, R. J., Lodge, G. M., Walker, R. G., Rawnsley, R. P., et al. (2009). Climate change effects on pasture systems in south-eastern Australia. Crop Pasture Sci. 60, 933–942.
Curran, P. J. (1989). Remote sensing of foliar chemistry. Remote Sens. Environ. 30, 271–278. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(89)90069-2
Dahal, K., Gadapati, W., Savitch, L. V., Singh, J., and Hüner, N. P. (2012). Cold acclimation and BnCBF17-over-expression enhance photosynthetic performance and energy conversion efficiency during long-term growth of Brassica napus under elevated CO2 conditions. Planta 236, 1639–1652. doi: 10.1007/s00425-012-1710-2
Dahal, K., and Vanlerberghe, G. C. (2017). Alternative oxidase respiration maintains both mitochondrial and chloroplast function during drought. New Phytol. 213, 560–571. doi: 10.1111/nph.14169
Dahal, K., and Vanlerberghe, G. C. (2018). Growth at elevated CO2 requires acclimation of the respiratory chain to support photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 178, 82–100. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00712
Dahal, K., Wang, J., Martyn, G. D., Rahimy, F., and Vanlerberghe, G. C. (2014). Mitochondrial alternative oxidase maintains respiration and preserves photosynthetic capacity during moderate drought in Nicotiana tabacum . Plant Physiol. 166, 1560–1574. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.247866
Dalal, J., Lopez, H., Vasani, N. B., Hu, Z., Swift, J. E., Yalamanchili, R., et al. (2015). A photorespiratory bypass increases plant growth and seed yield in biofuel crop Camelina sativa . Biotechnol. Biofuels 8:175. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0357-351
de Carvalho, M. H. C. (2008). Drought stress and reactive oxygen species. Plant Signal. Behav. 3, 156–165. doi: 10.4161/psb.3.3.5536
de Oliveira Silva, F. M., Lichtenstein, G., Alseekh, S., Rosado-Souza, L., Conte, M., Suguiyama, V. F., et al. (2018). The genetic architecture of photosynthesis and plant growth-related traits in tomato. Plant. Cell Environ. 41, 327–341. doi: 10.1111/pce.13084
Desikan, R., Hancock, J. T., Bright, J., Harrison, J., Weir, I., Hooley, R., et al. (2005). A role for ETR1 in hydrogen peroxide signaling in stomatal guard cells. Plant Physiol. 137, 831–834. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.056994
Dhanapal, A. P., Ray, J. D., Singh, S. K., Hoyos-Villegas, V., Smith, J. R., Purcell, L. C., et al. (2015). Genome-wide association analysis of diverse soybean genotypes reveals novel markers for Nitrogen derived from atmosphere (Ndfa), nitrogen concentration ([N]) and C/N ratio. Plant Genome. 8, 1–5.
Dietz, K. J., and Pfannschmidt, T. (2011). Novel regulators in photosynthetic redox control of plant metabolism and gene expression. Plant Physiol. 155, 1477–1485. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.170043
Ding, F., Wang, M., Zhang, S., and Ai, X. (2016). Changes in SBPase activity influence photosynthetic capacity, growth, and tolerance to chilling stress in transgenic tomato plants. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–14. doi: 10.1038/srep32741
Dittrich, M., Mueller, H. M., Bauer, H., Peirats-Llobet, M., Rodriguez, P. L., Geilfus, C.-M., et al. (2019). The role of Arabidopsis ABA receptors from the PYR/PYL/RCAR family in stomatal acclimation and closure signal integration. Nat. Plants 5, 1002–1011. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0490-490
Döring, F., Billakurthi, K., Gowik, U., Sultmanis, S., Khoshravesh, R., Das Gupta, S., et al. (2019). Reporter-based forward genetic screen to identify bundle sheath anatomy mutants in A. thaliana . Plant J. 97, 984–995. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14165
Dreccer, M. F., Barnesa, L. R., and Meder, R. (2014). carbohydrates in wheat can be monitored in the field using hyperspectral reflectance. Field Crops Res. 159, 70–80. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.01.001
Driever, S. M., Simkin, A. J., Alotaibi, S., Fisk, S. J., Madgwick, P. J., Sparks, C. A., et al. (2017). Increased sbpase activity improves photosynthesis and grain yield in wheat grown in greenhouse conditions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 372:20160384. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0384
Du, B., Liu, L., Wang, Q., Sun, G., Ren, X., Li, C., et al. (2019). Identification of QTL underlying the leaf length and area of different leaves in barley. Sci. Rep. 9:4431. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40703-40706
Dusenge, M. E., Duarte, A. G., and Way, D. A. (2019). Plant carbon metabolism and climate change: elevated CO2 and temperature impacts on photosynthesis, photorespiration and respiration. New Phytol. 221, 32–49. doi: 10.1111/nph.15283
Ehleringer, J. R., Sage, R. F., Flanagan, L. B., and Pearcy, R. W. (1991). Climate change and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 95–99. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(91)90183-x
Eisenhut, M., Bräutigam, A., Timm, S., Florian, A., Tohge, T., Fernie, A. R., et al. (2017). Photorespiration is crucial for dynamic response of photosynthetic metabolism and stomatal movement to altered CO2 availability. Mol. Plant. 10, 47–61. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.09.011
Ermakova, M., Lopez-Calgagno, P. E., Raines, C. A., Furbank, R. T., and von Caemmerer, S. (2019). Overexpression of the Rieske FeS protein of the Cytochrome b6f complex increases C4 photosynthesis in Setaria viridis . Commun. Biol. 2:314. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0561-569
Evain, S., Flexas, J., and Moya, I. (2004). A new instrument for passive remote sensing: 2. Measurement of leaf and canopy reflectance changes at 531 nm and their relationship with photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence. Remote Sens. Environ. 91, 175–185. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.03.012
Fahlgren, N., Feldman, M., Gehan, M. A., Wilson, M. S., Shyu, C., Bryant, D. W., et al. (2015). A versatile phenotyping system and analytics platform reveals diverse temporal responses to water availability in Setaria. Mol. Plant 8, 1520–1535. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.06.005
FAO (2009). Feeding the World in 2050. World Agricultural Summit on Food Security. Rome: FAO.
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., and Berry, J. A. (1980). A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90. doi: 10.1007/bf00386231
Feng, Z., Mao, Y., Xu, N., Zhang, B., Wei, P., Yang, D. L., et al. (2014). Multi-generation analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 4632–4637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400822111
Fiedler, K., Bekele, W. A., Matschegewski, C., Snowdon, R., Wieckhorst, S., Zacharias, A., et al. (2016). Cold tolerance during juvenile development in sorghum: a comparative analysis by genome-wide association and linkage mapping. Plant Breed. 135, 598–606. doi: 10.1111/pbr.12394
Fleisher, D. H., Condori, B., Quiroz, R., Alva, A., Asseng, S., Barreda, C., et al. (2017). A potato model inter-comparison across varying climates and productivity levels. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 1258–1281. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13411
Flexas, J., Escalona, J. M., Evain, S., Gulías, J., Moya, I., Osmond, C. B., et al. (2002). Steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence (Fs) measurements as a tool to follow variations of net CO2 assimilation and stomatal conductance during water-stress in C3 plants. Physiol. Plant. 114, 231–240. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1140209.x
Flood, P. J., Harbinson, J., and Aarts, M. G. M. (2011). Natural genetic variation in plant photosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 327–335. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.02.005
Flugel, F., Timm, S., Arrivault, S., Florian, A., Stitt, M., Fernie, A. R., et al. (2017). The photorespiratory metabolite 2-phosphoglycolate regulates photosynthesis and starch accumulation in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell 29, 2537–2551. doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00256
Foyer, C. H., Neukermans, J., Queval, G., Noctor, G., and Harbinson, J. (2012). Photosynthetic control of electron transport and the regulation of gene expression. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 1637–1661. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers013
Fracheboud, Y., Haldimann, P., Leipner, J., and Stamp, P. (1999). Chlorophyll fluorescence as a selection tool for cold tolerance of photosynthesis in maize ( Zea mays L.). J. Exp. Bot. 50, 1533–1540. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/50.338.1533
Fracheboud, Y., Ribaut, J. M., Vargas, M., Messmer, R., and Stamp, P. (2002). Identification of quantitative trait loci for cold-tolerance of photosynthesis in maize ( Zea mays L.). J. Exp. Bot. 53, 1967–1977. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erf040
Franklin, K. A., and Whitelam, G. C. (2007). Light-quality regulation of freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana . Nat. Genet. 39, 1410–1413. doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.3
Friso, G., Giacomelli, L., Ytterberg, A. J., Peltier, J.-B., Rudella, A., Sun, Q., et al. (2004). In-depth analysis of the thylakoid membrane proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplasts: new proteins, new functions, and a plastid proteome database. Plant Cell 16, 478–499. doi: 10.1105/tpc.017814
Gehan, M. A., Park, S., Gilmour, S. J., An, C., Lee, C.-M., and Thomashow, M. F. (2015). Natural variation in the C-repeat binding factor cold response pathway correlates with local adaptation of Arabidopsis ecotypes. Plant J. 84, 682–693. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13027
Goudriaan, J. (1986). A simple and fast numerical method for the computation of daily totals of crop photosynthesis. Agric. For. Meteorol. 38, 249–254. doi: 10.1016/0168-1923(86)90063-8
Goudriaan, J., and van Laar, H. H. (1994). Modelling Potential Crop Growth Processes - Textbook with Exercises. Current Issues in Production Ecology 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gray, J. E., Holroyd, G. H., van der Lee, F. M., Bahrami, A. R., Sijmons, P. C., Woodward, F. I., et al. (2000). The HIC signalling pathway links CO2 perception to stomatal development. Nature 408, 713–716. doi: 10.1038/35047071
Gray, S. B., Dermody, O., Klein, S. P., Locke, A. M., McGrath, J. M., Paul, R. E., et al. (2016). Intensifying drought eliminates the expected benefits of elevated carbon dioxide for soybean. Nat. Plants 2:16132. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.132
Grbic, V., and Bleecker, A. B. (1995). Ethylene regulates the timing of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis . Plant J. 8, 595–602. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.8040595.x
Grover, A., Mittal, D., Negi, M., and Lavania, D. (2013). Generating high temperature tolerant transgenic plants: achievements and challenges. Plant Sci. 205–206, 38–47. doi: 10.1016/J.PLANTSCI.2013.01.005
Gu, J., Yin, X., Struik, P. C., Stomph, T. J., and Wang, H. (2012). Using chromosome introgression lines to map quantitative trait loci for photosynthesis parameters in rice ( Oryza sativa L.) leaves under drought and well-watered field conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 455–469. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err292
Gudesblat, G. E., Schneider-Pizoń, J., Betti, C., Mayerhofer, J., Vanhoutte, I., van Dongen, W., et al. (2012). SPEECHLESS integrates brassinosteroid and stomata signalling pathways. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 548–554. doi: 10.1038/ncb2471
Guo, P., Baum, M., Varshney, R. K., Graner, A., Grando, S., and Ceccarelli, S. (2008). QTLs for chlorophyll and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in barley under post-flowering drought. Euphytica 163, 203–214. doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9629-6
Gupta, S. K., Sharma, S., Santisree, P., Kilambi, H. V., Appenroth, K., Sreelakshmi, Y., et al. (2014). Complex and shifting interactions of phytochromes regulate fruit development in tomato. Plant. Cell Environ. 37, 1688–1702. doi: 10.1111/pce.12279
Gururani, M. A., Ganesan, M., and Song, P.-S. (2015). Photo-biotechnology as a tool to improve agronomic traits in crops. Biotechnol. Adv. 33, 53–63. doi: 10.1016/J.BIOTECHADV.2014.12.005
Hahn, F., Mantegazza, O., Greiner, A., Hegemann, P., Eisenhut, M., and Weber, A. P. M. (2017). An efficient visual screen for CRISPR/Cas9 activity in Arabidopsis thaliana . Front. Plant Sci. 08:39. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00039
Hall, M., Mata-Cabana, A., Åkerlund, H.-E., Florencio, F. J., Schröder, W., Lindahl, M., et al. (2010). Thioredoxin targets of the plant chloroplast lumen and their implications for plastid function. Proteomics 10, 987–1001. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200900654
Hanson, A. D., Amthor, J. S., Sun, J., Niehaus, T. D., Gregory, J. F., Bruner, S. D., et al. (2018). Redesigning thiamin synthesis: prospects and potential payoffs. Plant Sci. 273, 92–99. doi: 10.1016/J.PLANTSCI.2018.01.019
Hara, K., Kajita, R., Torii, K. U., Bergmann, D. C., and Kakimoto, T. (2007). The secretory peptide gene EPF1 enforces the stomatal one-cell-spacing rule. Genes Dev. 21, 1720–1725. doi: 10.1101/gad.1550707
Harley, P. C., Loreto, F., Di Marco, G., and Sharkey, T. D. (1992). Theoretical considerations when estimating the mesophyll conductance to CO2 flux by analysis of the response of photosynthesis to CO2. Plant Phys. 98, 1429–1436. doi: 10.1104/pp.98.4.1429
Hedrich, R., and Geiger, D. (2017). Biology of SLAC1-type anion channels - from nutrient uptake to stomatal closure. New Phytol. 216, 46–61. doi: 10.1111/nph.14685
Herritt, M., Dhanapal, A. P., Purcell, L. C., and Fritschi, F. B. (2018). Identification of genomic loci associated with 21chlorophyll fluorescence phenotypes by genome-wide association analysis in soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 18:312. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1517-1519
Hikosaka, K. (2010). Mechanisms underlying interspecific variation in photosynthetic capacityacross wild plant species. Plant Biotech. 27, 223–229. doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.27.223
Hikosaka, K., Ishikawa, K., Borjigidai, A., Muller, O., and Onoda, Y. (2006). Temperature acclimation of photosynthesis: mechanisms involved in the changes in temperature dependence of photosynthetic rate. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 291–302. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj049
Hiltscher, H., Rudnik, R., Shaikhali, J., Heiber, I., Mellenthin, M., Meirelles Duarte, I., et al. (2014). The radical induced cell death protein 1 (RCD1) supports transcriptional activation of genes for chloroplast antioxidant enzymes. Front. Plant Sci. 5:475. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00475
Hirotsu, N., Ujiie, K., Perera, I., Iri, A., Kashiwagi, T., and Ishimaru, K. (2017). Partial loss-of-function of NAL1 alters canopy photosynthesis by changing the contribution of upper, and lower canopy leaves in rice. Sci. Rep. 7:15958. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15886-15885
Hsu, P. K., Takahashi, Y., Munemasa, S., Merilo, E., Laanemets, K., Waadt, R., et al. (2018). Abscisic acid-independent stomatal CO2 signal transduction pathway and convergence of CO2 and ABA signaling downstream of OST1 kinas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, E9971–E9980. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1809204115
Hu, X., Wu, L., Zhao, F., Zhang, D., Li, N., Zhu, G., et al. (2015). Phosphoproteomic analysis of the response of maize leaves to drought, heat and their combination stress. Front. Plant Sci. 6:298. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00298
Huang, J., Taylor, J. P., Chen, J. G., Uhrig, J. F., Schnell, D. J., Nakagawa, T., et al. (2006). The plastid protein THYLAKOID FORMATION1 and the plasma membrane G-protein GPA1 interact in a novel sugar-signaling mechanism in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell 18, 1226–1238. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.037259
Huang, X., and Han, B. (2014). Natural variations and genome-wide association studies in crop plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 65, 531–551. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-35715
Huang, X., Wei, X., Sang, T., Zhao, Q., Feng, Q., Zhao, Y., et al. (2010). Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat. Genet. 42, 961–967.
Huang, Z. A., Jiang, D. A., Yang, Y., Sun, J. W., and Jin, S. H. (2004). Effects of nitrogen deficiency on gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidant enzymes in leaves of rice plants. Photosynthetica 42, 357–364. doi: 10.1023/B:PHOT.0000046153.08935.4c
Hubbart, S., Peng, S., Horton, P., Chen, Y., and Murchie, E. H. (2007). Trends in leaf photosynthesis in historical rice varieties developed in the Philippines since 1966. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 3429–3438. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm192
Hüner, N. P., Dahal, K., Kurepin, L. V., Savitch, L., Singh, J., Ivanov, A. G., et al. (2014). Potential for increased photosynthetic performance and crop productivity in response to climate change: role of CBFs and gibberellic acid. Front. Chem. 2:18. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2014.00018
Hunt, L., and Gray, J. E. (2009). The signaling peptide EPF2 controls asymmetric cell divisions during stomatal development. Curr. Biol. 19, 864–869. doi: 10.1016/J.CUB.2009.03.069
Huynh, L., Ehlers, J. D., Huang, B. E., Munoz-Amatriain, M., Lonardi, S., Santos, J. R. P., et al. (2018). A multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) population for genetic analysis and improvement of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). Plant J. 93, 1129–1142. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13827
Ichikawa, Y., Tamoi, M., Sakuyama, H., Maruta, T., Ashida, H., Yokota, A., et al. (2010). Generation of transplastomic lettuce with enhanced growth and high yield. GM Crops 1, 322–326. doi: 10.4161/gmcr.1.5.14706
Inomata, T., Baslam, M., Masui, T., Koshu, T., Takamatsu, T., Kaneko, K., et al. (2018). Proteomics analysis reveals non-controlled activation of photosynthesis and protein synthesis in a rice npp1 mutant under high temperature and elevated CO2 conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19:2655. doi: 10.3390/ijms19092655
Ishihara, H., Moraes, T. A., Pyl, E.-T., Schulze, W. X., Obata, T., Scheffel, A., et al. (2017). Growth rate correlates negatively with protein turnover in Arabidopsis accessions. Plant J. 91, 416–429. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13576
Ishimaru, K., Yano, M., Aoki, N., Ono, K., Hirose, T., Lin, S. Y., et al. (2001). Toward the mapping of physiological and agronomic characters on a rice function map: QTL analysis and comparison between QTLs and expressed sequence tags. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102, 793–800. doi: 10.1007/s001220000467
Izumi, M., and Nakamura, S. (2018). Chloroplast protein turnover: the influence of extraplastidic processes, including autophagy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19:828. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030828
Jimbo, H., Izuhara, T., Hihara, Y., Hisabori, T., and Nishiyama, Y. (2019). Light-inducible expression of translation factor EF-Tu during acclimation to strong light enhances the repair of photosystem II. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 21268–21273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909520116
Jun, T., Freewalt, K., Michel, A. P., Mian, R., and Singh, R. (2014). Identification of novel QTL for leaf traits in soybean. Plant Breed. 133, 61–66. doi: 10.1111/pbr.12107
Jung, H.-S., Crisp, P. A., Estavillo, G. M., Cole, B., Hong, F., Mockler, T. C., et al. (2013). Subset of heat-shock transcription factors required for the early response of Arabidopsis to excess light. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 14474–14479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311632110
Kanaoka, M. M., Pillitteri, L. J., Fujii, H., Yoshida, Y., Bogenschutz, N. L., Takabayashi, J., et al. (2008). SCREAM/ICE1 and SCREAM2 specify three cell-state transitional steps leading to Arabidopsis stomatal differentiation. Plant Cell 20:1775. doi: 10.1105/TPC.108.060848
Kanning, M., Kuhling, I., Trautz, D., and Jarmer, T. (2018). High-Resolution UAV-based hyperspectral imagery for LAI and chlorophyll estimations from wheat for yield prediction. Remote Sens. 10:2000. doi: 10.3390/rs10122000
Kant, S., Seneweera, S., Rodin, J., Materne, M., Burch, D., Rothstein, S. J., et al. (2012). Improving yield potential in crops under elevated CO2: integrating the photosynthetic and nitrogen utilization efficiencies. Front. Plant Sci. 3:162. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00162
Karaba, A., Dixit, S., Greco, R., Aharoni, A., Trijatmiko, K. R., Marsch-Martinez, N., et al. (2007). Improvement of water use efficiency in rice by expression of HARDY, an Arabidopsis drought and salt tolerance gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 15270–15275. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707294104
Kebeish, R., Niessen, M., Thiruveedhi, K., Bari, R., Hirsch, H. J., Rosenkranz, R., et al. (2007). Chloroplastic photorespiratory bypass increases photosynthesis and biomass production in Arabidopsis thaliana . Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 593–599. doi: 10.1038/nbt1299
Keller, B., Vass, I., Matsubara, S., Paul, K., Jedmowski, C., Pieruschka, R., et al. (2018). Maximum fluorescence and electron transport kinetics determined by light-induced fluorescence transients (LIFT) for photosynthesis phenotyping. Photosynth. Res. 140, 221–233. doi: 10.1007/s11120-018-0594-599
Kiani, S. P., Maury, P., Sarrafi, A., and Grieu, P. (2008). QTL analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) under well-watered and water-stressed conditions. Plant Sci. 175, 565–573. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.06.002
Kim, G.-D., Cho, Y.-H., and Yoo, S.-D. (2017). Phytohormone ethylene-responsive Arabidopsis organ growth under light is in the fine regulation of Photosystem II deficiency-inducible AKIN10 expression. Sci. Rep. 7:2767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02897-2895
Kim, T.-W., Michniewicz, M., Bergmann, D. C., and Wang, Z.-Y. (2012). Brassinosteroid regulates stomatal development by GSK3-mediated inhibition of a MAPK pathway. Nature 482, 419–422. doi: 10.1038/nature10794
Köhler, I. H., Ruiz-Vera, U. M., VanLoocke, A., Thomey, M. L., Clemente, T., Long, S. P., et al. (2017). Expression of cyanobacterial FBP/SBPase in soybean prevents yield depression under future climate conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 715–726. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw435
Kohzuma, K., Cruz, J. A., Akashi, K., Hoshiyasu, S., Munekage, Y. N., Yokota, A., et al. (2009). The long-term responses of the photosynthetic proton circuit to drought. Plant Cell Environ. 32, 209–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01912.x
Kolber, Z. S., Prasil, O., and Falkowski, P. G. (1998). Measurements of variable chlorophyll fluorescence using fast repetition rate techniques: defining methodology and experimental protocols. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerget. 1367, 88–106. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2728(98)00135-132
Kong, F., Deng, Y., Wang, G., Wang, J., Liang, X., and Meng, Q. (2014). LeCDJ1, a chloroplast DnaJ protein, facilitates heat tolerance in transgenic tomatoes. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 56, 63–74. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12119
Krause, G. H., and Weis, E. (1984). Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool in plant physiology. II. Interpretation of fluorescence signals. Photosynth. Res. 5, 139–157. doi: 10.1007/Bf00028527
Kromdijk, J., Głowacka, K., Leonelli, L., Gabilly, S. T., Iwai, M., Niyogi, K. K., et al. (2016). Improving photosynthesis and crop productivity by accelerating recovery from photoprotection. Science 354, 857–861. doi: 10.1126/science.aai8878
Kubis, A., and Bar-Even, A. (2019). Synthetic biology approaches for improving photosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 70, 1425–1433. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz029
Kumar, B., Talukdar, A., Bala, I., Verma, K., Kumar-Lal, S., Sapra, R., et al. (2014). Population structure and association mapping studies for important agronomic traits in soybean. J. Genet. 93, 775—-784.
Kunihiro, A., Yamashino, T., Nakamichi, N., Niwa, Y., Nakanishi, H., and Mizuno, T. (2011). Phytochrome-interacting factor 4 and 5 (PIF4 and PIF5) activate the homeobox ATHB2 and auxin-inducible IAA29 genes in the coincidence mechanism underlying photoperiodic control of plant growth of Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant Cell Physiol. 52, 1315–1329. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr076
Kurepin, L. V., Dahal, K. P., Savitch, L. V., Singh, J., Bode, R., Ivanov, A. G., et al. (2013). Role of CBFs as integrators of chloroplast redox, phytochrome and plant hormone signaling during cold acclimation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 12729–12763. doi: 10.3390/ijms140612729
Larosa, V., Meneghesso, A., La Rocca, N., Steinbeck, J., Hippler, M., Szabò, I., et al. (2018). Mitochondria affect photosynthetic electron transport and photosensitivity in a green alga. Plant Physiol. 176, 2305–2314. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01249
Le, J., Liu, X.-G., Yang, K.-Z., Chen, X.-L., Zou, J.-J., Wang, H.-Z., et al. (2014). Auxin transport and activity regulate stomatal patterning and development. Nat. Commun. 5:3090. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4090
Leakey, A. D. B., Ainsworth, E. A., Bernacchi, C. J., Rogers, A., Long, S. P., and Ort, D. R. (2009). Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations; six important lessons from FACE. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 2859–2876. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp096
Leakey, A. D. B., Uribelarrea, M., Ainsworth, E. A., Naidu, S. L., Rogers, A., Ort, D. R., et al. (2006). Photosynthesis, productivity, and yield of maize are not affected by open-air elevation of CO2 concentration in the absence of drought. Plant Physiol. 140, 779–790. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.073957
Lefebvre, S., Lawson, T., Zakhleniuk, O. V., Lloyd, J. C., Raines, C. A., and Fryer, M. (2005). Increased sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase activity in transgenic tobacco plants stimulates photosynthesis and growth from an early stage in development. Plant Physiol. 138, 451–460. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.055046
Legris, M., Ince, Y. Ç, and Fankhauser, C. (2019). Molecular mechanisms underlying phytochrome-controlled morphogenesis in plants. Nat. Commun. 10:5219. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13045-0
Leng, G., and Hall, J. (2019). Crop yield sensitivity of global major agricultural countries to droughts and the projected changes in the future. Sci. Total Environ. 654, 811–821. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.434
Lepistö, A., and Rintamäki, E. (2012). Coordination of plastid and light signaling pathways upon development of Arabidopsis leaves under various photoperiods. Mol. Plant. 5, 799–816. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssr106
Lesk, C., Rowhani, P., and Ramankutty, N. (2016). Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production. Nature 529, 84–87. doi: 10.1038/nature16467
Leuning, R., Kelliher, F. M., De Pury, D. G. G., and Schultze, E.-D. (1995). Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, conductance and transpiration: scaling from leaves to canopies. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 1183–1200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00628.x
Li, F., Chen, B., Xu, K., Gao, G., Yan, G., Qiao, J., et al. (2015). A genome-wide association study of plant height and primary branch number in rapeseed ( Brassica napus ). Plant Sci. 242, 169–177. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.05.012
Li, J., Nagpal, P., Vitart, V., McMorris, T. C., and Chory, J. (1996). A role for brassinosteroids in light-dependent development of Arabidopsis . Science 272, 398–401. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5260.398
Li, T., Hasegawa, T., Yin, X., Zhu, Y., Boote, K., Adam, M., et al. (2015). Uncertainties in predicting rice yield by current crop models under a wide range of climatic conditions. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 1328–1341. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12758
Li, T., Liu, B., Spalding, M. H., Weeks, D. P., and Yang, B. (2012). High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 390–392. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2199
Lindahl, M., and Kieselbach, T. (2009). Disulphide proteomes and interactions with thioredoxin on the track towards understanding redox regulation in chloroplasts and cyanobacteria. J. Proteomics 72, 416–438. doi: 10.1016/J.JPROT.2009.01.003
Liu, D., Chen, S., Liu, X., Yang, F., Liu, W. G., She, Y. H., et al. (2019). Genetic map construction and QTL analysis of leaf-related traits in soybean under monoculture and relay intercropping. Sci. Rep. 9;2716. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39110-8
Liu, X., Fan, Y., Mak, M., Babla, M., Holford, P., Wang, F., et al. (2017). QTLs for stomatal and photosynthetic traits related to salinity tolerance in barley. BMC Genomics 18:9. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3380-0
Liu, Y., Wei, H., Ma, M., Li, Q., Kong, D., Sun, J., et al. (2019). Arabidopsis FHY3 and FAR1 proteins regulate the balance between growth and defense responses under shade conditions. Plant Cell 31, 2089–2106. doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00991
Lobell, D. B., Roberts, M. J., Schlenker, W., Braun, N., Little, B. B., Rejesus, R. M., et al. (2014). Greater sensitivity to drought accompanies maize yield increase in the U.S. Midwest. Science 344, 516–519. doi: 10.1126/science.1251423
Long, S. P., Ainsworth, E. A., Rogers, A., and Ort, D. R. (2004). Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the future. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 591–628. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141610
Long, S. P., and Bernacchi, C. J. (2003). Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. J. Exp Bot. 54, 2393–2401. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg262
Long, S. P., Marshall-Colon, A., and Zhu, X.-G. (2015). Meeting the global food demand of the future by engineering crop photosynthesis and yield potential. Cell 161, 56–66. doi: 10.1016/J.CELL.2015.03.019
Long, S. P., Zhu, X. G., Naidu, S. L., and Ort, D. R. (2006). Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant Cell Environ. 29, 315–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01493.x
López-Calcagno, P. E., Fisk, S., Brown, K. L., Bull, S. E., South, P. F., and Raines, C. A. (2019). Overexpressing the H-protein of the glycine cleavage system increases biomass yield in glasshouse and field-grown transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 17, 141–151. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12953
Loriaux, S., Avenson, T., Welles, J., McDermitt, D., Eckles, R., Riensche, B., et al. (2013). Closing in on maximum yield of chlorophyll fluorescence using a single multiphase flash of sub-saturating intensity. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 1755–1770. doi: 10.1111/pce.12115
Lucas, M. R., Ehlers, J. D., Huynh, B., Diop, N. N., Roberts, P. A., and Close, T. J. (2013). Markers for breeding heat-tolerant cowpea. Mol. Breed. 31, 529–536. doi: 10.1007/s11032-012-9810-z
Luo, M., Zhang, S., Tang, C., Jia, G., Tang, S., Zhi, H., et al. (2018). Screening of mutants related to the C4 photosynthetic kranz structure in foxtail millet. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1650. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01650
Lv, H., Yang, Y., Li, H., Liu, Q., Zhang, J., Yin, J., et al. (2018). Genome-wide association studies of photosynthetic traits related to phosphorus efficiency in soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1226. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01226
MacAlister, C. A., Ohashi-Ito, K., and Bergmann, D. C. (2007). Transcription factor control of asymmetric cell divisions that establish the stomatal lineage. Nature 445, 537–540. doi: 10.1038/nature05491
Machacova, K., Vainio, E., Urban, O., and Pihlatie, M. (2019). Seasonal dynamics of stem N2O exchange follow the physiological activity of boreal trees. Nat. Commun. 10:4989. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12976-y
Mahajan, G. R., Sahoo, R. N., Pandey, R. N., Gupta, V. K., and Kumar, D. (2014). Using hyperspectral remote sensing techniques to monitor nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur and potassium in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). Precision Agric. 15, 227–240.
Maier, A., Fahnenstich, H., von Caemmerer, S., Engqvist, M. K. M., Weber, A. P. M., Flügge, U.-I., et al. (2012). Transgenic introduction of a glycolate oxidative cycle into A. thaliana chloroplasts leads to growth improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 3:38. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00038
Martín, G., Leivar, P., Ludevid, D., Tepperman, J. M., Quail, P. H., and Monte, E. (2016). Phytochrome and retrograde signalling pathways converge to antagonistically regulate a light-induced transcriptional network. Nat. Commun. 7:11431. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11431
Masle, J., Gilmore, S. R., and Farquhar, G. D. (2005). The ERECTA gene regulates plant transpiration efficiency in Arabidopsis . Nature 436, 866–870. doi: 10.1038/nature03835
Matiu, M., Ankerst, D. P., and Menzel, A. (2017). Interactions between temperature and drought in global and regional crop yield variability during 1961-2014. PLoS One 12:e0178339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178339
Maxwell, K., and Johnson, G. N. (2000). Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide. J. Exp. Bot. 51, 659–668. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659
Medlyn, B. E. (1998). Physiological basis of the light use efficiency model. Tree Physiol. 18, 167–176. doi: 10.1093/treephys/18.3.167
Meroni, M., Rossini, M., Guanter, L., Alonso, L., Rascher, U., Colombo, R., et al. (2009). Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: review of methods and applications. Remote Sens. Environ. 113, 2037–2051. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.05.003
Meyer, S., and Genty, B. (1999). Heterogeneous inhibition of photosynthesis over the leaf surface of Rosa rubiginosa L. during water stress and abscisic acid treatment: induction of a metabolic component by limitation of CO2 diffusion. Planta 210, 126–131. doi: 10.1007/s004250050661
Meyer, S., Saccardy-Adji, K., Rizza, F., and Genty, B. (2001). Inhibition of photosynthesis by Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in bean leaves determined by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Cell Environ. 24, 947–955. doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00737.x
Millar, A. H., Whelan, J., Soole, K. L., and Day, D. A. (2011). Organization and regulation of mitochondrial respiration in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 62, 79–104. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103857
Mishra, V., and Cherkauer, K. A. (2010). Retrospective droughts in the crop growing season: implications to corn and soybean yield in the Midwestern United States. Agric. For. Meteorol. 150, 1030–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.04.002
Miura, K., Okamoto, H., Okuma, E., Shiba, H., Kamada, H., Hasegawa, P. M., et al. (2013). SIZ1 deficiency causes reduced stomatal aperture and enhanced drought tolerance via controlling salicylic acid-induced accumulation of reactive oxygen species in Arabidopsis . Plant J. 73, 91–104. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12014
Miyagawa, Y., Tamoi, M., and Shigeoka, S. (2001). Overexpression of a cyanobacterial. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 965–969. doi: 10.1038/nbt1001-965
Moore, B. D., Cheng, S. H., Sims, D., and Seemann, J. R. (1999). The biochemical and molecular basis for photosynthetic acclimation to elevated atmospheric CO2. Plant Cell Environ. 22, 567–582. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00432.x
Muchero, W., Ehlers, J. D., Close, T. J., and Roberts, P. A. (2009). Mapping QTL for drought stress-induced premature senescence and maturity in cowpea [ Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. Theor. Appl. Genet. 118, 849–863. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0944-947
Muchero, W., Roberts, P. A., Diop, N. N., Drabo, I., Cisse, N., Close, T. J., et al. (2013). Genetic architecture of delayed senescence, biomass, and grain yield under drought stress in cowpea. PLoS One 8:e70041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070041
Murchie, E. H., Pinto, M., and Horton, P. (2009). Agriculture and the new challenges for photosynthesis research. New Phytol. 181, 532–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02705.x
Nakai, M. (2015). The TIC complex uncovered: the alternative view on the molecular mechanism of protein translocation across the inner envelope membrane of chloroplasts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1847, 957–967. doi: 10.1016/J.BBABIO.2015.02.011
Nazar, R., Iqbal, N., Syeed, S., and Khan, N. A. (2011). Salicylic acid alleviates decreases in photosynthesis under salt stress by enhancing nitrogen and sulfur assimilation and antioxidant metabolism differentially in two mungbean cultivars. J. Plant Physiol. 168, 807–815. doi: 10.1016/J.JPLPH.2010.11.001
Nendel, C., Kersebaum, K. C., Mirschel, W., Manderscheid, R., Weigel, H.-J., and Wenkel, K.-O. (2009). Testing different CO2 response algorithms against a FACE crop rotation experiment. NJAS Wageningen J. Life Sci. 57, 17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.njas.2009.07.005
Nguyen, C. V., Vrebalov, J. T., Gapper, N. E., Zheng, Y., Zhong, S., Fei, Z., et al. (2014). Tomato GOLDEN2-LIKE transcription factors reveal molecular gradients that function during fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell 26, 585–601. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.118794
Nölke, G., Houdelet, M., Kreuzaler, F., Peterhänsel, C., and Schillberg, S. (2014). The expression of a recombinant glycolate dehydrogenase polyprotein in potato ( Solanum tuberosum ) plastids strongly enhances photosynthesis and tuber yield. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12, 734–742. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12178
Oakley, C. G., Savage, L., Lotz, S., Larson, G. R., Thomashow, M. F., Kramer, D. M., et al. (2018). Genetic basis of photosynthetic responses to cold in two locally adapted populations of Arabidopsis thaliana . J. Exp. Bot. 69, 699–709. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx437
Ogura, T., and Busch, W. (2015). From phenotypes to causal sequences: using genome wide association studies to dissect the sequence basis for variation of plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 23, 98–108. doi: 10.1016/J.PBI.2014.11.008
Ogura, T., Goeschl, C., Filiault, D., Mirea, M., Slovak, R., Wolhrab, B., et al. (2019). Root system depth in Arabidopsis is shaped by EXOCYST70A3 via the dynamic modulation of auxin transport. Cell 178, 400.e16–412.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.021
Okazaki, K., Kabeya, Y., Suzuki, K., Mori, T., Ichikawa, T., Matsui, M., et al. (2015). The PLASTID DIVISION1 and 2 components of the chloroplast division machinery determine the rate of chloroplast division in land plant cell differentiation. Plant Cell 21, 1769–1780. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.067785
O’Leary, B. M., Lee, C. P., Atkin, O. K., Cheng, R., Brown, T. B., and Millar, A. H. (2017). Variation in leaf respiration rates at night correlates with carbohydrate and amino acid supply. Plant Physiol. 174, 2261–2273. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00610
Ort, D. R., Merchant, S. S., Alric, J., Barkan, A., Blankenship, R. E., Bock, R., et al. (2015). Redesigning photosynthesis to sustainably meet global food and bioenergy demand. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 8529–8536. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1424031112
Ortiz, D., Hu, J., and Salas-Fernandez, M. G. (2017). Genetic architecture of photosynthesis in Sorghum bicolor under non-stress and cold stress conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 4545–4557. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx276
Page, D. R., and Grossniklaus, U. (2002). The art and design of genetic screens: Arabidopsis thaliana . Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 124–136. doi: 10.1038/nrg730
Pandey, M. K., Roorkiwal, M., Singh, V. K., Ramalingam, A., Kudapa, H., Thudi, M., et al. (2016). Emerging genomic tools for legume breeding: current status and future prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 7:455. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00455
Panthee, D. R., Pantalone, V. R., Saxton, A. M., West, D. R., and Sams, C. (2006). Genomic regions associated with amino acid composition in soybean. Mol. Breed. 17, 79–89. doi: 10.1007/s11032-005-2519-5
Parinov, S., and Sundaresan, V. (2000). Functional genomics in Arabidopsis : large-scale insertional mutagenesis complements the genome sequencing project. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 11, 157–161. doi: 10.1016/s0958-1669(00)00075-6
Parry, M. A. J., Reynolds, M., Salvucci, M. E., Raines, C., Andralojc, P. J., Zhu, X. G., et al. (2011). Raising yield potential of wheat. II. Increasing photosynthetic capacity and efficiency. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 453–467. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq304
Pastenes, C., and Horton, P. (1996). Effect of high temperature on photosynthesis in beans (I. Oxygen evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence). Plant Physiol. 112, 1245–1251. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.3.1245
Pego, J. V., Kortstee, A. J., Huijser, C., and Smeekens, S. C. (2000). Photosynthesis, sugars and the regulation of gene expression. J. Exp. Bot. 51, 407–416. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/51.suppl_1.407
Peng, S., Laza, R. C., Visperas, R. M., Sanico, A. L., and Cassman, K. G. K. G. (2001). Grain yield of rice cultivars and lines developed in the Philippines since 1966. Crop Sci. 40, 307–314. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2000.402307x
Penuelas, J., and Filella, I. (1998). Visible and near-infrared reflectance techniques for diagnosing plant physiological status. Trends Plant Sci. 3, 151–156. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(98)01213-8
Pesaresi, P., Hertle, A., Pribil, M., Kleine, T., Wagner, R., Strissel, H., et al. (2009). Arabidopsis STN7 kinase provides a link between short- and long-term photosynthetic acclimation. Plant Cell 21, 2402–2423. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.064964
Petrillo, E., Godoy Herz, M. A., Fuchs, A., Reifer, D., Fuller, J., Yanovsky, M. J., et al. (2014). A chloroplast retrograde signal regulates nuclear alternative splicing. Science 344, 427–430. doi: 10.1126/science.1250322
Pfannschmidt, T. (2003). Chloroplast redox signals: how photosynthesis controls its own genes. Trends Plant Sci. 8, 33–41. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)00005-5
Pick, T. R., Brautigam, A., Schulz, M. A., Obata, T., Fernie, A. R., and Weber, A. P. M. (2013). PLGG1, a plastidic glycolate glycerate transporter, is required for photorespiration and defines a unique class of metabolite transporters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 3185–3190. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215142110
Pillitteri, L. J., and Dong, J. (2013). Stomatal development in Arabidopsis . Arab. B. 11:e0162. doi: 10.1199/tab.0162
Pinheiro, C., and Chaves, M. M. (2011). Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from available data? J. Exp. Bot. 62, 869–882. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq340
Pospisilova, J., Vagner, M., Malbeck, J., Travnickova, A., and Batkova, P. (2005). Interactions between abscisic acid and cytokinins during water stress and subsequent rehydration. Biol. Plant. 49, 533–540. doi: 10.1007/s10535-005-0047-0
Powell, A. L. T., Nguyen, C. V., Hill, T., Cheng, K. L., Figueroa-Balderas, R., Aktas, H., et al. (2012). Uniform ripening encodes a Golden 2-like transcription factor regulating tomato fruit chloroplast development. Science 336, 1711–1715. doi: 10.1126/science.1222218
Price, A. H., Cairns, J. E., Horton, P., Jones, H. G., and Griffiths, H. (2002). Linking drought-resistance mechanisms to drought avoidance in upland rice using a QTL approach: progress and new opportunities to integrate stomatal and mesophyll responses. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 989–1004. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.371.989
Priesack, E., and Gayler, S. (2009). “Agricultural crop models: Concepts of resource acquisition and assimilate partitioning,” in Progress in Botany 70 , eds U. E. Lüttge, W. Beyschlag, and J. Murata (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 195–222. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-68421-3_9
Priesack, E., Gayler, S., Rötzer, T., Seifert, T., and Pretzsch, H. (2012). “Mechanistic modelling of soil–plant–atmosphere systems,” in Growth and Defence in Plants, Ecological Studies 220 , eds R. Matyssek, H. Schnyder, W. Oßwald, D. Ernst, J. C. Munch, and H. Pretzsch (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 335–353. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-30645-7_15
Rachmilevitch, S., Cousins, B., and Bloom, J. (2004). Nitrate assimilation in plant shoots depends on photorespiration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 11506–11510. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404388101
Rasheed, A., Hao, Y., Xia, X., Khan, A., Xu, Y., Varshney, R. K., et al. (2017). Crop breeding chips and genotyping platforms: progress, challenges, and perspectives. Mol. Plant. 10, 1047–1064. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.06.008
Reich, P. B., Tjoelker, M. G., Pregitzer, K. S., Wright, I. J., Oleksyn, J., and Machado, J. L. (2008). Scaling of respiration to nitrogen in leaves, stems and roots of higher land plants. Ecol. Lett. 11, 793–801. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01185.x
Renger, G. (2007). Primary Processes of Photosynthesis: Principles and Apparatus, 2 Parts. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry Publishers.
Reynolds, M., Bonnett, D., Chapman, S. C., Furbank, R. T., Manès, Y., Mather, D. E., et al. (2011). Raising yield potential of wheat. I. Overview of a consortium approach and breeding strategies. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 439–452. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq311
Richardson, A. D., and Reeves, J. B. (2005). Quantitative reflectance spectroscopy as an alternative to traditional wet lab analysis of foliar chemistry: near-infrared and mid-infrared calibrations compared. Can. J. Res. 35, 1122–1130. doi: 10.1139/x05-037
Roach, T., and Krieger-Liszkay, A. K. (2014). Regulation of photosynthetic electron transport and photoinhibition. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 15, 351–362. doi: 10.2174/1389203715666140327105143
Rochaix, J. D. (2011). Reprint of: regulation of photosynthetic electron transport. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1807, 878–886. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2011.05.009
Rogers, A. (2014). The use and misuse of V cmax in earth system models. Photosynth. Res. 119, 15–29. doi: 10.1007/s11120-013-9818-1
Rosema, A., Snel, J. F. H., Zahn, H., Buurmeijer, W. F., and Van Hove, L. W. A. (1998). The relation between laser-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis. Remote Sens. Environ. 65, 143–154. doi: 10.1016/s0034-4257(98)00020-0
Rosenthal, D. M., Locke, A. M., Khozaei, M., Raines, C. A., Long, S. P., and Ort, D. R. (2011). Over-expressing the C3photosynthesis cycle enzyme Sedoheptulose-1-7 Bisphosphatase improves photosynthetic carbon gain and yield under fully open air CO2 fumigation (FACE). BMC Plant Biol. 11:123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-123
Rossel, J. B., Wilson, P. B., Hussain, D., Woo, N. S., Gordon, M. J., Mewett, O. P., et al. (2007). Systemic and intracellular responses to photooxidative stress in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell 19, 4091–4110. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.045898
Ruiz-Vera, U. M., De Souza, A. P., Long, S. P., and Ort, D. R. (2017). The role of sink strength and nitrogen availability in the down-regulation of photosynthetic capacity in field-grown Nicotiana tabacum L. at elevated CO2 concentration. Front. Plant Sci. 8:998. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00998
Ruiz-Vera, U. M., Siebers, M., Gray, S. B., Drag, D. W., Rosenthal, D. M., Kimball, B. A., et al. (2013). Global warming can negate the expected CO2 stimulation in photosynthesis and productivity for soybean grown in the Midwestern United States. Plant Physiol. 162, 410–423. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.211938
Rushton, D. L., Tripathi, P., Rabara, R. C., Lin, J., Ringler, P., Boken, A. K., et al. (2012). WRKY transcription factors: key components in abscisic acid signalling. Plant Biotechnol. J. 10, 2–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00634.x
Sadler, N. C., Melnicki, M. R., Serres, M. H., Merkley, E. D., and Chrisler, W. B. (2014). Live cell chemical profiling of temporal redox dynamics in a photoautotrophic cyanobacterium. ACS Chem. Biol. 9, 291–300. doi: 10.1021/cb400769v
Sakamoto, H., Maruyama, K., Sakuma, Y., Meshi, T., Iwabuchi, M., Shinozaki, K., et al. (2004). Arabidopsis Cys2/His2-type zinc-finger proteins function as transcription repressors under drought, cold, and high-salinity stress conditions. Plant Physiol. 136, 2734–2746. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.046599
Sánchez-Rodríguez, J., Pérez, P., and Martínez-Carrasco, R. (1999). Photosynthesis, carbohydrate levels and chlorophyll fluorescence-estimated intercellular CO2 in water-stressed Casuarina equisetifolia Forst. & Forst. Plant Cell Environ. 22, 867–873. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00447.x
Sankaran, S., Khot, L. R., and Carter, A. H. (2015). Field-based crop phenotyping: multispectral aerial imaging for evaluation of winter wheat emergence and spring stand. Comput. Electron. Agric. 118, 372–379. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.09.001
Sanz-Saez, A., Heath, K. D., Burke, P. V., and Ainsworth, E. A. (2015). Inoculation with an enhanced N2-fixing Bradyrhizobium japonicum strain (USDA110) does not alter soybean (Glycine max Merr.) response to elevated [CO2]. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 2589–2602. doi: 10.1111/pce.12577
Sanz-Saez, A., Koester, R. P., Rosenthal, D. M., Montes, C. M., Ort, D. R., and Ainsworth, E. A. (2017). Leaf and canopy scale drivers of genotypic variation in soybean response to elevated carbon dioxide concentration. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 3908–3920. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13678
Saradhi, P. P., Suzuki, I., Katoh, A., Sakamoto, A., Sharmila, P., Shi, D.-J., et al. (2000). Protection against the photo-induced inactivation of the photosystem II complex by abscisic acid. Plant Cell Environ. 23, 711–718. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00579.x
Scafaro, A. P., Negrini, A. C. A., O’Leary, B., Rashid, F. A. A., Hayes, L., Fan, Y., et al. (2017). The combination of gas-phase fluorophore technology and automation to enable high-throughput analysis of plant respiration. Plant Methods 13:16. doi: 10.1186/s13007-017-0169-163
Scheben, A., and Edwards, D. (2017). Genome editors take on crops. Science 355, 1122–1123. doi: 10.1126/science.aal4680
Scheben, A., Wolter, F., Batley, J., Puchta, H., and Edwards, D. (2017). Towards CRISPR/Cas crops-bringing together genomics and genome editing. New Phytol. 216, 682–698. doi: 10.1111/nph.14702
Schlotterer, C., Tobler, R., Kofler, R., and Nolte, V. (2014). Sequencing pools of individuals - mining genome-wide polymorphism data without big funding. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 749–763. doi: 10.1038/nrg3803
Scotford, I. M., and Miller, P. C. H. (2004). Estimating tiller density and leaf area index of winter wheat using spectral reflectance and ultrasonic sensing techniques. Biosyst. Eng. 89, 395–408. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.08.019
Serbin, S. P., Dillaway, D. N., Kruger, E. L., and Townsend, P. A. (2012). Leaf optical properties reflect variation in photosynthetic metabolism and its sensitivity to temperature. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 489–502. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err294
Sewelam, N., Kazan, K., and Schenk, P. M. (2016). Global plant stress signaling: reactive oxygen species at the cross-road. Front. Plant Sci. 7:187. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00187
Shen, B.-R., Wang, L.-M., Lin, X.-L., Yao, Z., Xu, H.-W., Zhu, C.-H., et al. (2019). Engineering a new chloroplastic photorespiratory bypass to increase photosynthetic efficiency and productivity in rice. Mol. Plant 12, 199–214. doi: 10.1016/J.MOLP.2018.11.013
Shimizu, M., Kato, H., Ogawa, T., Kurachi, A., Nakagawa, Y., and Kobayashi, H. (2010). Sigma factor phosphorylation in the photosynthetic control of photosystem stoichiometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 10760–10764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911692107
Shin, A.-Y., Han, Y.-J., Baek, A., Ahn, T., Kim, S. Y., Nguyen, T. S., et al. (2016). Evidence that phytochrome functions as a protein kinase in plant light signalling. Nat. Commun. 7:11545. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11545
Sieber, M. H., Thomsen, M. B., and Spradling, A. C. (2016). Electron transport chain remodeling by GSK3 during oogenesis connects nutrient state to reproduction. Cell 164, 420–432. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.020
Silva-Perez, V., Molero, G., Serbin, S. P., Condon, A. G., Reynolds, M. P., Furbank, R. T., et al. (2018). Hyperspectral reflectance as a tool to measure biochemical and physiological traits in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 483–496. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx421
Simkin, A. J., Lopez-Calcagno, P. E., Davey, P. A., Headland, L. R., Lawson, T., Timm, S., et al. (2017a). Simultaneous stimulation of sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase, fructose 1,6-bisphophate aldolase and the photorespiratory glycine decarboxylase-H protein increases CO2 assimilation, vegetative biomass and seed yield in Arabidopsis . Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 805–816. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12676
Simkin, A. J., López-Calcagno, P. E., and Raines, C. A. (2019). Feeding the world: improving photosynthetic efficiency for sustainable crop production. J. Exp. Bot. 70, 1119–1140. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery445
Simkin, A. J., McAusland, L., Headland, L. R., Lawson, T., and Raines, C. A. (2015). Multigene manipulation of photosynthetic carbon assimilation increases CO2 fixation and biomass yield in tobacco. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 4075–4090. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv204
Simkin, A. J., McAusland, L., Lawson, T., and Raines, C. A. (2017b). Overexpression of the RieskeFeS protein increases electron transport rates and biomass yield. Plant Physiol. 175, 134–145. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00622
Singh, B. D., and Singh, A. K. (2015). Marker-Assisted Plant Breeding: Principles and Practices. Cham: Springer.
Slattery, R. A., and Ort, D. R. (2015). Photosynthetic energy conversion efficiency: setting a baseline for gauging future improvements in important food and biofuel crops. Plant Physiol. 168, 383–392. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00066
Somerville, C. R. (1986). Analysis of photosynthesis with mutants of higher plants and algae. Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. 37, 467–507.
Song, Y., Chen, Q., Ci, D., Shao, X., and Zhan, D. (2014). Effects of high temperature on photosynthesis and related gene expression in poplar. BMC Plant Biol. 14:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-111
South, P. F., Cavanagh, A. P., Liu, H. W., and Ort, D. R. (2019). Synthetic glycolate metabolism pathways stimulate crop growth and productivity in the field. Science 363:eaat9077. doi: 10.1126/science.aat9077
Spitters, C. J. T. (1986). Separating the diffuse and direct component of global radiation and its implications for modeling canopy photosynthesis Part II. Calculation of canopy photosynthesis. Agric. For. Meteorol. 38, 231–242. doi: 10.1016/0168-1923(86)90060-90062
Spitters, C. J. T., van Keulen, H., and van Kraalingen, D. W. G. (1989). “A simple and universal crop growth simulator: SUCROS87,” in Simulation and Systems Management in Crop Production , eds R. Rabbinge, S. A. Ward, and H. H. van Laar (Wageningen: Backhuys Publishers), 147–181.
Stephenson, T. J., McIntyre, C. L., Collet, C., and Xue, G. P. (2011). TaNF-YB3 is involved in the regulation of photosynthesis genes in Triticum aestivum . Funct. Integr. Genom. 11, 327–340. doi: 10.1007/s10142-011-0212-9
Stinziano, J. R., McDermitt, D. K., Lynch, D. J., Saathoff, A. J., Morgan, P. B., and Hanson, D. T. (2019). The rapid A/Ci response: a guide to best practices. New Phytol. 221, 625–627. doi: 10.1111/nph.15383
Stinziano, J. R., Morgan, P. B., Lynch, D. J., Saathoff, A. J., McDermitt, D. K., and Hanson, D. T. (2017). The rapid A-Ci response: photosynthesis in the phenomic era. Plant Cell Environ. 40, 1256–1262. doi: 10.1111/pce.12911
Strigens, A., Freitag, N. M., Gilbert, X., Grieder, C., Riedelsheimer, C., Schrag, T. A., et al. (2013). Association mapping for chilling tolerance in elite flint and dent maize inbred lines evaluated in growth chamber and field experiments. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 1871–1887. doi: 10.1111/pce.12096
Su, J., Zhang, F., Chong, X., Song, A., Guan, Z., Fang, W., et al. (2019). Genome-wide association study identifies favorable SNP alleles and candidate genes for waterlogging tolerance in chrysanthemums. Hortic. Res. 6:21. doi: 10.1038/s41438-018-0101-107
Sugano, S. S., Shimada, T., Imai, Y., Okawa, K., Tamai, A., Mori, M., et al. (2010). Stomagen positively regulates stomatal density in Arabidopsis . Nature 463, 241–244. doi: 10.1038/nature08682
Takagi, D. H., Ihara, S., and Takumi, C. (2019). Miyake growth light environment changes the sensitivity of photosystem I photoinhibition depending on common wheat cultivars. Front. Plant. Sci. 10:686. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00686
Takagi, H., Abe, A., Yoshida, K., Kosugi, S., Natsume, S., Mitsuoka, C., et al. (2013). QTL-seq: rapid mapping of quantitative trait loci in rice by whole genome resequencing of DNA from two bulked populations. Plant J. 74, 174–183. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12105
Takai, T., Adachi, S., Taguchi-Shiobara, F., Sanoh-Arai, Y., Iwasawa, N., Yoshinaga, S., et al. (2013). A natural variant of NAL1, selected in high-yield rice breeding programs, pleiotropically increases photosynthesis rate. Sci. Rep. 3:2149. doi: 10.1038/srep02149
Takai, T., Kondo, M., Yano, M., and Yamamoto, T. (2010). A quantitative trait locus for chlorophyll content and its association with leaf photosynthesis in rice. Rice 3, 172–180. doi: 10.1007/s12284-010-9047-6
Tamoi, M., Nagaoka, M., Miyagawa, Y., and Shigeoka, S. (2006). Contribution of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase and sedoheptulose-1,7- bisphosphatase to the photosynthetic rate and carbon flow in the Calvin cycle in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 47, 380–390. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcj004
Tanaka, Y., Sano, T., Tamaoki, M., Nakajima, N., Kondo, N., and Hasezawa, S. (2006). Cytokinin and auxin inhibit abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure by enhancing ethylene production in Arabidopsis . J. Exp. Bot. 57, 2259–2266. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj193
Taylor, S. H., and Long, S. P. (2019). Phenotyping photosynthesis on the limit – a critical examination of RACiR. New Phytol. 221, 621–624. doi: 10.1111/nph.15382
Teng, S., Qian, Q., Zeng, D. L., Kunihiro, Y., Fujimoto, K., Huang, D. N., et al. (2004). QTL analysis of leaf photosynthetic rate and related physiological traits in rice ( Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 135, 1–7. doi: 10.1023/b:euph.0000009487.89270.e9
Teulat, B., Merah, O., Sirault, X., Borries, C., Waugh, R., and This, D. (2002). QTLs for grain carbon isotope discrimination in field-grown barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106, 118–126. doi: 10.1007/s00122-002-1028-8
Tholen, D., Pons, T. L., Voesenek, L. A. C. J., and Poorter, H. (2007). Ethylene insensitivity results in down-regulation of RuBisCO expression and photosynthetic capacity in tobacco. Plant Physiol. 144, 1305–1315. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.099762
Thompson, A. L., Thorp, K. R., Conley, M., Andrade-Sanchez, P., Heun, J. T., Dyer, J. M., et al. (2018). Deploying a proximal sensing cart to identify drought-adaptive traits in upland cotton for high-throughput phenotyping. Front. Plant Sci. 9:507. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00507
Thompson, M., Gamage, D., Hirotsu, N., Martin, A., and Seneweera, S. (2017). Effects of elevated carbon dioxide on photosynthesis and carbon partitioning: a Perspective on root sugar sensing and hormonal crosstalk. Front. Physiol. 8:578. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00578
Thornley, J. H. M. (1998). Dynamic model of leaf photosynthesis with acclimation to light and nitrogen. Ann. Bot. 81, 421–430. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1997.0575
Thornley, J. H. M. (2004). Acclimation of photosynthesis to light and canopy nitrogen distribution: an interpretation. Ann. Bot. 93, 473–475. doi: 10.1093/aob/mch051
Thornley, J. H. M. (2011). Plant growth and respiration re-visited: maintenance respiration defined – it is an emergent property of, not a separate process within, the system-and why the respiration : photosynthesis ratio is conservative. Ann. Bot. 108, 1365–1380. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr238
Timm, S., Florian, A., Arrivault, S., Stitt, M., Fernie, A. R., and Bauwe, H. (2012). Glycine decarboxylase controls photosynthesis and plant growth. FEBS Lett. 586, 3692–3697. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.08.027
Timm, S., Wittmiß, M., Gamlien, S., Ewald, R., Florian, A., Frank, M., et al. (2015). Mitochondrial dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase activity shapes photosynthesis and photorespiration of Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant Cell 27, 1968–1984. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00105
Tissue, D. T., Griffin, K. L., Turnbull, M. H., and Whitehead, D. (2005). Stomatal and nonL. Griffinlimitations to photosynthesis in four tree species in a temperate rainforest dominated by Dacrydium cupressinum in New Zealand. Tree Physiol. 25, 447–456. doi: 10.1093/treephys/25.4.447
Torralbo, F., Vicente, R., Morcuende, R., González-Murua, C., and Aranjuelo, I. (2019). C and N metabolism in barley leaves and peduncles modulates responsiveness to changing CO2. J. Exp. Bot. 70, 599–611. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery380
Tsai, Y., Chen, K., Cheng, T., Lee, C., Lin, S. H., and Tung, C. W. (2019). Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis in diverse rice varieties reveals the positive correlation between the seedlings salt tolerance and photosynthetic efficiency. BMC Plant Biol. 19:403. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1983-8
Tubiello, F., and Ewert, F. (2002). Simulating the effects of elevated CO2 on crops: approaches and applications for climate change. Eur. J. Agron. 18, 57–74. doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00097-97
Uematsu, K., Suzuki, N., Iwamae, T., Inui, M., and Yukawa, H. (2012). Increased fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase in plastids enhances growth and photosynthesis of tobacco plants. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 3001–3009. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers004
Ulloa, M. R., Cantrell, G. R., Percy, G., Zeiger, E., and Lu, Z. M. (2000). QTL analysis of stomatal conductance and relationship to lint yield in an interspecific cotton. J. Cotton Sci. 4, 10–18.
van Bezouw, R. F. H. M., Keurentjes, J. J. B., Harbinson, J., and Aarts, M. G. M. (2018). Converging phenomics and genomics to study natural variation in plant photosynthesis efficiency. Plant J. 97, 112–133. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14190
van Rooijen, R., Aarts, M. G., and Harbinson, J. (2015). Natural genetic variation for acclimation of photosynthetic light use efficiency to growth irradiance in Arabidopsis . Plant Physiol. 167, 1412–1429. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.252239
Vanlerberghe, G. C. (2013). Alternative oxidase: a mitochondrial respiratory pathway to maintain metabolic and signaling homeostasis during abiotic and biotic stress in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 6805–6847. doi: 10.3390/ijms14046805
Vanlerberghe, G. C., Martyn, G. D., and Dahal, K. (2016). Alternative oxidase: a respiratory electron transport chain pathway essential for maintaining photosynthetic performance during drought stress. Physiol. Plant. 157, 322–337. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12451
Vanlerberghe, G. C., and McIntosh, L. (1997). Alternative oxidase: from gene to function. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 48, 703–734. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.703
Vanuytrecht, E., and Thorburn, P. J. (2017). Responses to atmospheric CO2 concentrations in crop simulation models: a review of current simple and semi-complex representations and options for model development. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 1806–1820. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13600
Varshney, R. K. (2016). Exciting journey of 10 years from genomes to fields and markets: some success stories of genomics-assisted breeding in chickpea, pigeonpea and groundnut. Plant Sci. 242, 98–107. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.09.009
Varshney, R. K., Ribaut, J. M., Buckler, E. S., Tuberosa, R., and Rafalski, J. A. (2012). Langridge P. Can genomics boost productivity of orphan crops? Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 1172–1176. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2440
Varshney, R. K., Singh, V. K., Kumar, A., Powell, W., and Sorrells, M. E. (2018). Can genomics deliver climate-change ready crops? Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 45, 205–211. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2018.03.007
Varshney, R. K., Terauchi, R., and McCouch, S. R. (2014). Harvesting the promising fruits of genomics: applying genome sequencing technologies to crop breeding. PLoS Biol. 12:e1001883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001883
Vicente, R., Martínez-Carrasco, R., Pérez, P., and Morcuende, R. (2018). New insights into the impacts of elevated CO2, nitrogen, and temperature levels on the regulation of C and N metabolism in durum wheat using network analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 192–199. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2017.08.003
Vicente, R., Pérez, P., Martínez-Carrasco, R., Usadel, B., Kostadinova, S., and Morcuende, R. (2015). Quantitative RT-PCR platform to measure transcript levels of C and N metabolism-related genes in durum wheat: transcript profiles in elevated CO2 and high temperature at different levels of N supply. Plant Cell Physiol. 56, 1556–1573. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcv079
Virlet, N., Sabermanesh, K., Sadeghi-Tehran, P., and Hawkesford, M. J. (2017). Field scanalyzer: an automated robotic field phenotyping platform for detailed crop monitoring. Funct. Plant Biol. 44, 143–153. doi: 10.1071/Fp16163
Walker, R. P., Paoletti, A., Leegood, R. C., and Famiani, F. (2016). Phosphorylation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) in the flesh of fruits. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 108, 323–327. doi: 10.1016/J.PLAPHY.2016.07.021
Wang, E., Martre, P., Asseng, S., Ewert, F., Zhao, Z., Maiorano, A., et al. (2017). Improved temperature response functions reduce uncertainty in wheat yield projections. Nat. Plants 3:17102. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2017.102
Wang, H., Ngwenyama, N., Liu, Y., Walker, J. C., and Zhang, S. (2007). Stomatal development and patterning are regulated by environmentally responsive mitogen-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell 19, 63–73. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048298
Wang, J., Chu, S., Zhang, H., Zhu, Y., Cheng, H., and Yu, D. (2016). Development and application of a novel genome-wide SNP array reveals domestication history in soybean. Sci. Rep. 9:20728.
Wang, L., Fan, L., Loescher, W., Duan, W., Liu, G., Cheng, J., et al. (2010). Salicylic acid alleviates decreases in photosynthesis under heat stress and accelerates recovery in grapevine leaves. BMC Plant Biol. 10:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-34
Wang, W.-H., Yi, X.-Q., Han, A.-D., Liu, T.-W., Chen, J., Wu, F.-H., et al. (2012). Calcium-sensing receptor regulates stomatal closure through hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide in response to extracellular calcium in Arabidopsis . J. Exp. Bot. 63, 177–190. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err259
Wang, Y.-P., and Leuning, R. (1998). A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy I: model description and comparison with a multi-layered model. Agric. For. Meteorol. 91, 89–111. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(98)00061-6
Wang, Y. Y., Cheng, Y. H., Chen, K. E., and Tsay, Y.-F. (2018). Nitrate transport, signaling, and use efficiency. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 69, 85–122. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-40056
Waters, M. T., Wang, P., Korkaric, M., Capper, R. G., Saunders, N. J., and Langdale, J. A. (2009). GLK transcription factors coordinate expression of the photosynthetic apparatus in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell 21, 1109–1128. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.065250
Watson, A., Ghosh, M. J., Williams, W. S., Cuddy, J., Simmonds, M. D., Rey, M. A., et al. (2018). Speed breeding is a powerful tool to accelerate crop research and breeding. Nat. Plants 4, 23–29.
Weber, A. P. M., and Bar-Even, A. (2019). Update: improving the efficiency of photosynthetic carbon reactions. Plant Physiol. 179, 803–812. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.01521
Weber, V. S., Araus, J. L., Cairns, J. E., Sanchez, C., Melchinger, A. E., and Orsini, E. (2012). Prediction of grain yield using reflectance spectra of canopy and leaves in maize plants grown under different water regimes. Field Crops Res. 128, 82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.016
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Atkin, O. K., Lusk, C. H., Tjoelker, M. G., and Westoby, M. (2006). Irradiance, temperature and rainfall influence leaf dark respiration in woody plants: evidence from comparisons across 20 sites. New Phytol. 169, 309–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01590.x
Wu, J., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Q., Han, X., Gu, X., and Lu, T. (2015). The molecular cloning and clarification of a photorespiratory mutant, oscdm1, using enhancer trapping. Front. Genet. 6:226. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00226
Xie, X., Xia, X., Kuang, S., Zhang, X., Yin, X., Yu, J., et al. (2017). A novel ethylene responsive factor CitERF13 plays a role in photosynthesis regulation. Plant Sci. 256, 112–119. doi: 10.1016/J.PLANTSCI.2016.11.001
Xiong, L., and Zhu, J. K. (2003). Regulation of abscisic acid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 133, 29–36. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.025395
Yan, X., Qu, C., Li, J., Chen, L., and Liu, L. (2015). QTL analysis of leaf photosynthesis rate and related physiological traits in Brassica napus . J. Integr. Agric. 14, 1261–1268. doi: 10.1016/s2095-3119(14)60958-8
Yang, X., Tang, J., Mustard, J. F., Lee, J. E., Rossini, M., Joiner, J., et al. (2015). Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence that correlates with canopy photosynthesis on diurnal and seasonal scales in a temperate deciduous forest. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 2977–2987. doi: 10.1002/2015gl063201
Yang, Y., Chen, J., Liu, Q., Ben, C., Todd, C. D., Shi, J., et al. (2012). Comparative proteomic analysis of the thermotolerant plant Portulaca oleracea acclimation to combined high temperature and humidity stress. J. Proteome Res. 11, 3605–3623. doi: 10.1021/pr300027a
Ye, W., Hu, S., Wu, L., Ge, C., Cui, Y., Chen, P., et al. (2017). Fine mapping a major QTL qFCC7 L for chlorophyll content in rice ( Oryza sativa L.) cv. PA64s. Plant Growth Regul. 81, 81–90. doi: 10.1007/s10725-016-0188-185
Yendrek, C. R., Tomaz, T., Montes, C. M., Cao, Y., Morse, A. M., Brown, P. J., et al. (2017). High-throughput phenotyping of maize leaf physiological and biochemical traits using hyperspectral reflectance. Plant Physiol. 173, 614–626. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01447
Yin, X. (2013). Improving ecophysiological simulation models to predict the impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on crop productivity. Ann. Bot. 112, 465–475. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct016
Yin, X., and Struik, P. C. (2009). C3 and C4 photosynthesis models: an overview from the perspective of crop modelling. NJAS Wageningen J. Life Sci. 57, 27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.njas.2009.07.001
Yin, X., and van Laar, H. H. (2005). Crop Systems Dynamics – An Ecophysiological Simulation Model for Genotype-by-Environment Interactions. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Zhang, H. Y., Chen, Q. J., Wang, Y. J., Xu, Y., and Zhang, F. (2004). Identification of QTLs for cucumber poor light tolerance. Mol. Plant Breed. 2, 795–799.
Zhang, J.-Y., He, S.-B., Li, L., and Yang, H.-Q. (2014). Auxin inhibits stomatal development through MONOPTEROS repression of a mobile peptide gene STOMAGEN in mesophyll. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, E3015–E3023. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400542111
Zhang, X., Wollenweber, B., Jiang, D., Liu, F., and Zhao, J. (2008). Water deficits and heat shock effects on photosynthesis of a transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana constitutively expressing ABP9, a bZIP transcription factor. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 839–848. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm364
Zhao, K., Tung, C.-W., Eizenga, G. C., Wright, M. H., Ali, M. L., Price, A. H., et al. (2011). Genome-wide association mapping reveals a rich genetic architecture of complex traits in Oryza sativa . Nat. Commun. 2:467. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1467
Zhao, P., Cui, R., Xu, P., Wu, J., Mao, J. L., Chen, Y., et al. (2017). ATHB17 enhances stress tolerance by coordinating photosynthesis associated nuclear gene and ATSIG5 expression in response to abiotic stress. Sci. Rep. 7:45492. doi: 10.1038/srep45492
Zhao, Y., Chan, Z., Gao, J., Xing, L., Cao, M., Yu, C., et al. (2016). ABA receptor PYL9 promotes drought resistance and leaf senescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 1949–1954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522840113
Zhu, C., Zhu, J., Cao, J., Jiang, Q., Liu, G., and Ziska, L. H. (2014). Biochemical and molecular characteristics of leaf photosynthesis and relative seed yield of two contrasting rice cultivars in response to elevated [CO2]. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 6049–6056. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru344
Zhu, X. G., de Sturler, E., and Long, S. P. (2007). Optimizing the distribution of resources between enzymes of carbon metabolism can dramatically increase photosynthetic rate: a numerical simulation using an evolutionary algorithm. Plant Physiol. 145, 513–526. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.103713
Zhu, X. G., Long, S. P., and Ort, D. R. (2008). What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass? Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 19, 153–159. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.02.004
Zhu, X. G., Long, S. P., and Ort, D. R. (2010). Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 235–261. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112206
Zimmermann, P., Hirsch-Hoffmann, M., and Hennig, L. G. W. (2004). GENEVESTIGATOR. Arabidopsis microarray database and analysis toolbox. Plant Physiol. 136, 2621–2632. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.046367
Zipper, S. C., Qiu, J., and Kucharik, C. J. (2016). Drought effects on US maize and soybean production: spatiotemporal patterns and historical changes. Enviro. Res. Lett. 11:094021. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/094021
Keywords : photosynthesis, climate change, crop improvement, -omics, phenotyping, modeling
Citation: Baslam M, Mitsui T, Hodges M, Priesack E, Herritt MT, Aranjuelo I and Sanz-Sáez Á (2020) Photosynthesis in a Changing Global Climate: Scaling Up and Scaling Down in Crops. Front. Plant Sci. 11:882. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00882
Received: 29 November 2019; Accepted: 29 May 2020; Published: 06 July 2020.
Copyright © 2020 Baslam, Mitsui, Hodges, Priesack, Herritt, Aranjuelo and Sanz-Sáez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
This article is part of the Research Topic
Photosynthesis in a Changing Global Climate: a Matter of Scale
Official Journal of the International Society of Photosynthesis Research
Photosynthesis Research is an international journal which publishes research in all areas in and related to photosynthesis. The journal welcomes basic and applied research at all levels of organization – including molecular, subcellular, cellular, whole plants, canopy, ecosystem, and global. Research in all photosynthetic systems, including natural organisms and (semi-)artificial systems are considered. The breadth of research covered by the journal includes, and is not limited to, the following areas in photosynthesis:
- Light absorption and emission; excitation energy transfer; charge separation; electron and proton transfer; catalysis
- Carbon assimilation/metabolism and photorespiration
- Structure and function
- Regulatory mechanisms and signaling pathways
- Ecosystems, agriculture and the environment
- Climate change, renewable energy and fuels
Research in photosynthesis employing various disciplines are welcome, including but not limited to biochemistry, biophysics, cell and molecular biology, genomics, theory and modelling. Studies taking an interdisciplinary approach with a broad range of experimental and theoretical techniques are encouraged. Photosynthesis Research is the official journal of the International Society for Photosynthesis Research (ISPR).
- Discusses both basic and applied aspects of photosynthesis
- Includes research at all levels of plant organization: molecular, subcellular, cellular, whole plant, canopy, ecosystem, etc.
- Covers photophosphorylation, carbon assimilation, regulatory phenomena, molecular biology, environmental and ecological aspects, photorespiration and more
- Johannes Messinger
Issue 3, December 2023
Roadmap of electrons from donor side to the reaction center of photosynthetic purple bacteria with mutated cytochromes, authors (first, second and last of 4).
- Content type: Research
- Open Access
- Published: 30 November 2023
- Special Issue: Photo-Induced Processes in Photosynthesis – From Femtoseconds to Seconds
Using picosecond fluorescence lifetime analysis to determine photosynthesis in the world’s oceans
- Maxim Y. Gorbunov
- Paul G. Falkowski
- Published: 29 November 2023
Tracking the first electron transfer step at the donor side of oxygen-evolving photosystem II by time-resolved infrared spectroscopy
Authors (first, second and last of 5).
- Mohamad Yahia Dekmak
- Sarah M. Mäusle
- Published: 23 November 2023
- Special Issue: Energy Conversion Reactions in Natural and Artificial Photosynthesis
Preface to the special issue: the keynote lectures of the 18th International Congress on Photosynthesis Research
- Terry M. Bricker
- Julian J. Eaton-Rye
- Content type: Preface
- Pages: 77 - 80
- Special Issue: The Keynote Lectures of the 18th International Congress on Photosynthesis Research
Perspectives of cyanobacterial cell factories
- Anastasios Melis
- Diego Alberto Hidalgo Martinez
- Nico Betterle
- Content type: Review
- Published: 15 November 2023
Special issues at photosynthesis research.
Explore special issues recently published or in development
Special Issue of Photosynthesis Research for Sustainability, connected to the PHERS 2023 Conference in Istanbul
Call for Papers: Opening 10 July 2023 | Submission deadline 1 October 2023
Call for Papers: Photo-Induced Processes in Photosynthesis – From Femtoseconds to Seconds
A special issue in tribute to Prof. Vladimir A. Shuvalov Submission Deadline: 1 June 2023
Societies, partners and affiliations
For authors, working on a manuscript.
Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.
About this journal
- Biological Abstracts
- CAB Abstracts
- Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS)
- Current Contents/ Agriculture, Biology & Environmental Sciences
- Current Contents/ Life Sciences
- EBSCO Biomedical Reference Collection
- EBSCO Discovery Service
- Google Scholar
- Japanese Science and Technology Agency (JST)
- Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition
- OCLC WorldCat Discovery Service
- Pathway Studio
- ProQuest Algology, Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
- ProQuest-ExLibris Primo
- ProQuest-ExLibris Summon
- Science Citation Index
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)
- TD Net Discovery Service
- UGC-CARE List (India)
Rights and permissions
© Springer Nature B.V.